ADJECTIVAL RATINGS. The Government will perform an evaluation of the non-cost/price evaluation factors and subfactors of the Offeror’s proposal. Cost/Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating.
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS. The Government will perform an evaluation of the Technical Capability evaluation factors and sub-factors based on the offeror’s proposal. This evaluation focuses on strengths and weaknesses of the offeror’s proposal, resulting in the assignment of an adjectival rating for each factor and sub-factor. Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating.
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS. For evaluating each subjective criterion (i.e. Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, and Regulatory Compliance), the following adjectival ratings will be used: EXCELLENT Contractor has exceeded almost all of the performance requirements of the applicable criterion for the award-fee evaluation period. VERY GOOD Contractor has exceeded many of the performance requirements of the applicable criterion for the award-fee evaluation period. All unsatisfactory performance identified for the criterion during the period was considered minor in nature and has been addressed appropriately. GOOD Contractor has exceeded some of the performance requirements of the applicable criterion for the award-fee evaluation period. Some unsatisfactory performance may have been identified for the criterion during the award fee evaluation period, but it had limited impact and has been addressed. SATISFACTORY Contractor has generally met the performance requirements of the applicable criterion for the award-fee evaluation period. Any unsatisfactory performance has been or is in the process of being addressed. UNSATISFACTORY Contractor has failed to meet the performance requirements of the applicable criterion for the award-fee evaluation period. The following is applied to the final adjectival rating(s) for the subjective evaluation criteria: Adjective Rating Percentage of Subjective Component Fee Earned EXCELLENT 91 to 100% VERY GOOD 76 to 90% GOOD 51 to 75% SATISFACTORY No greater than 50% UNSATISFACTORY 0% Attachment 2 - SUBJECTIVE CRITERIA Quality (20%) Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship. Assess how successfully the Contractor meets program/project quality objectives such as producibility, reliability, maintainability, and inspectability. Assess the Contractor’s management of the quality control programs, as well as the work itself. Assess the Contractor’s ability to maintain quality control, address and review comments, identification and correction of deficient work, and overall quality related performance. The following items will be considered for evaluation: o QA Program – SIMCO maintains and implements an effective Quality Assurance program, with emphasis on Nuclear Quality Assurance (NQA)-1. SIMCO ensures compliance with and implementation of the prime contract requirements, and the quality and effectiveness of the Contractor’s implementing policies, plans, and procedures. o Assessments – SIM...
