Additional Evaluation Sample Clauses

Additional Evaluation. In addition to the evaluations required by law in paragraph B.3, principals and other supervisors may make evaluations at any time during the school year, which evaluations may cover individual observations or such periods of time as may be identified in the evaluation report.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Additional Evaluation. In addition to the evaluations required under paragraph 2.d.(1), evaluators may make interim evaluations at any time during the school year.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Additional Evaluation. In addition to the evaluations required under paragraph B.3 herein, principals and other supervisors and their designees may conduct evaluations at any time during the school year. These evaluations may cover individual observations that will be identified in the evaluation report. Additional evaluations described in this section shall be for the purpose of improving employee performance and/or for probation purposes. If the evaluator has any indication that the employee might not meet expectations in any of the seven categories of evaluation, the evaluator shall provide assistance through specific suggestions for improvement, opportunity to improve, and/or follow up assistance if requested, and observation prior to the final evaluation of the year.
Sample 1Sample 2
Additional Evaluation. An employee who does not agree with the contents of his/her evaluation may request an additional observation. However, this will not extend the time limit set forth herein for the non- renewal procedure as set forth in Article V.
Sample 1Sample 2
Additional Evaluation. In addition to the required evaluations, principals and other supervisors may make evaluations at any time during the school year, which evaluations may cover individual observations or such periods of time as may be identified in the evaluation report. 2016C. Observation Procedures: 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Sample 1
Additional Evaluation. 1.If the District intends to dismiss, suspend, or discipline a faculty member for "Unprofessional Conduct" or "Incompetency" under the grounds set forth in Education Code Section 87732, an additional evaluation shall be conducted in accordance with this Article.
Sample 1
Additional Evaluation. If, during the period between regularly scheduled evaluations of a regular faculty member, in the judgment of the appropriate administrator there is a new or escalating issue identified that is significant or compelling, the appropriate administrator may elect to follow the following process to initiate an additional evaluation:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Additional Evaluation. Additional Evaluations may be required at any time by the Superintendent/President or designee. The employee will be notified of any work deficiencies in advance of additional evaluation(s).
Sample 1
Additional Evaluation. Additional evaluations may be requested at any time by the supervisor and Vice President or administrator of the area after consultation with the Human Resources Office. An employee may also request an additional evaluation after consultation with CSEA and/or Human Resources.
Sample 1

Related to Additional Evaluation

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.