Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes Sample Clauses

Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes. Regional San will report to the State Water Board as identified in Adaptive Management Plan Section 1.5. Should an Adaptive Management Trigger occur, Regional San will identify limiting factors and implement appropriate Adaptive Management Actions from the actions delineated in Adaptive Management Plan Section 2.5 or other actions mutually agreed to in writing and in accordance with Contract Section 8.6. Regional San may also identify reasons why Adaptive Management Actions are not reasonable or feasible or may not result in the achievement of Performance Thresholds (e.g., extended drought conditions or infrastructure repairs) and will propose a plan in the Annual Report to meet Performance Thresholds in the next Review Report period. If, after review of the Annual Summary Report or Review Report, along with any other relevant monitoring data, the State Water Board concludes that Project Implementation Actions are occurring and Project Implementation Action metrics are below the associated Adaptive Management Triggers, or the State Water Board concludes it was not feasible to meet Performance Thresholds in the reporting period in question, the State Water Board will confirm this status with Regional San in writing, and Regional San will continue to implement its monitoring plan. If, after review of the Annual Summary Report or Review Report, along with any other relevant monitoring data, the State Water Board concludes that Project Implementation Action metrics are below the associated Adaptive Management Trigger and, if relevant, current Adaptive Management Actions being taken will not be sufficient to achieve Performance Thresholds, the State Water Board will initiate the Meet and Confer process. Through the Meet and Confer Process, the Decision-Making Body will identify the limiting factor(s) to achieving conditions at or above the Adaptive Management Triggers. Should Regional San not meet and confer, the State Water Board will independently investigate the limiting factor(s). Through the Meet and Confer Process or the State Water Board’s independent investigation:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Adaptive Management Trigger Decision-Making Processes

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Employee agrees to participate in the performance management system that the Employer adopts or introduces for the Employer, management and municipal staff of the Employer.

  • Project Management Plan 1 3.4.1 Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control 2 activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work.

  • Construction Management Plan Contractor shall prepare and furnish to the Owner a thorough and complete plan for the management of the Project from issuance of the Proceed Order through the issuance of the Design Professional's Certificate of Material Completion. Such plan shall include, without limitation, an estimate of the manpower requirements for each trade and the anticipated availability of such manpower, a schedule prepared using the critical path method that will amplify and support the schedule required in Article 2.1.5 below, and the Submittal Schedule as required in Article 2.2.3. The Contractor shall include in his plan the names and resumés of the Project Superintendent, Project Manager and the person in charge of Safety.

  • Configuration Management The Contractor shall maintain a configuration management program, which shall provide for the administrative and functional systems necessary for configuration identification, control, status accounting and reporting, to ensure configuration identity with the UCEU and associated cables produced by the Contractor. The Contractor shall maintain a Contractor approved Configuration Management Plan that complies with ANSI/EIA-649 2011. Notwithstanding ANSI/EIA-649 2011, the Contractor’s configuration management program shall comply with the VLS Configuration Management Plans, TL130-AD-PLN-010-VLS, and shall comply with the following:

  • Program Management 1.1.01 Implement and operate an Immunization Program as a Responsible Entity

  • Adaptive Management ‌ This CCAA is based on the principles of Adaptive Management set out in 65 Fed. Reg. at 35,242. The adaptive management process is a structured approach for dealing with uncertainty. The adaptive management process develops hypotheses regarding uncertainty and research to test those hypotheses in an iterative process to develop effective strategies for minimizing the uncertainty. The signatories to this CCAA agree and recognize that implementation of the Conservation Strategy objectives and criteria, Conservation Measures and Actions, and the Covered Area may change as new science emerges. The effectiveness of the Conservation Strategy objectives and criteria, Conservation Measures, Conservation Actions, monitoring methods, and new technologies will be reviewed by the Administrator on an annual basis, with input from the Adaptive Management Committee. The Adaptive Management Committee will be responsible for reviewing and evaluating the effectiveness of Conservation Program under the 2020 DSL CCAA as described in Sections 2.0 and 16.1, including the effectiveness and implementation of the Conservation Strategy, Conservation Measures and Conservation Actions; setting priorities for DSL Habitat conservation and monitoring habitat loss; and recommending changes to any aspect of the Conservation Program based on new science. As a result, appropriate modifications to the Conservation Measures and Actions may be incorporated to further refine the goals and objectives of this 2020 DSL CCAA. Such modifications are incorporated into existing CIs, if they were identified in changed circumstances in the 2020 DSL CCAA. Modifications not related to changed circumstances identified in the 2020 DSL CCAA and instead related to unforeseen circumstances may be incorporated into new CIs that take effect after the modifications have been made and to existing CIs only with written consent from the Participants and Service. Additionally, research projects that are designed to determine the effectiveness of management practices will be encouraged and utilized to determine what Adaptive Management is necessary. Changes resulting from Adaptive Management will flow through the Governance structure as described in Section 2.0 of this CCAA.

  • Change Management Process If Customer or Oracle requests a change in any of the specifications, requirements, Deliverables, or scope (including drawings and designs) of the Professional Services described in any Statement of Work, the party seeking the change shall propose the applicable changes by written notice. Within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of the written notice, each party’s project leads shall meet, either in person or via telephone conference, to discuss and agree upon the proposed changes. Oracle will prepare a change order describing the proposed changes to the Statement of Work and the applicable change in fees and expenses, if any (each, a “Change Order”). Change Orders are not binding unless and until they are executed by both parties. Executed Change Orders shall be deemed part of, and subject to, this Addendum. If the parties disagree about the proposed changes, the parties shall promptly escalate the change request to their respective senior management for resolution.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.