Activities in structured decision Sample Clauses

Activities in structured decision making processes Activities in a structured approach to decision-making include the following:  Developing a shared understanding of the problem in a socio-ecological context;  Setting up an appropriate organisational structure for the planning process;  Engaging the relevant stakeholders in the decision-making process;  Specifying objectives and trade-offs that capture the values of different stakeholders;  Setting targets linked to key issues that reflect desired management objectives and outcomes;  Identifying the range of decision alternatives from which actions are to be selected;  Specifying assumptions about resource structures and functions;  Projecting the consequences of alternative actions;  Identifying key uncertainties;  Measuring risk tolerance for potential consequences of decisions;  Accounting for future impacts of present decisions;  Accounting for legal requirements and constraints. Once a good understanding of the social-ecological context is developed, the remaining activities need not be carried out sequentially, as long as they are carried out as part of an iterative and learning process. It is this iterative process, whereby decision-makers actively engage, act and learn with stakeholders, that can lead to the institutional changes required for ensuring the sustainable management and harvesting of waterbird populations. Scientists assist the process by providing predictive models to better understand the biological system and predict outcomes of management actions, as well as by providing guidance on the design of monitoring protocols needed to assess the effects of alternative management actions. Scientists can also facilitate the iterative learning process as ‘honest brokers’ to ensure that the scientific models and evidence are correctly interpreted, and then incorporated into decision-making processes according to the overall objectives.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Activities in structured decision

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Project Changes 1.8.1. All changes shall be administered per the UGC.

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (OMB) AUDIT REQUIREMENTS The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in 2 CFR 200.

  • SCOPE CHANGES The Commissioner reserves the right to require, by written order, changes to the scope of the Contract, by altering, adding to or deducting from the Bid Specifications, such changes to be within the general scope of the Contract. If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work under the Contract, whether or not changed by the order, the Commissioner shall, upon notice from Contractor as hereafter stated, make an equitable adjustment in the Contract price, the delivery schedule or both and shall modify the Contract. The Contractor must assert its right to an adjustment under this clause within thirty days from the date of receipt of the written order. However, if the Commissioner decides that the facts justify it, the Commissioner may provide an adjustment without receipt of a proposal. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes clause, provided, however, that nothing in this clause shall excuse the Contractor from proceeding with the Contract as changed.

  • Program Changes Contractor agrees to inform the County of any alteration in program or service delivery at least thirty (30) days prior to the implementation of the change, or as soon as reasonably feasible.

  • Contract Changes Changes may not be made in the terms and conditions of this contract without the agreement and written permission of the Director of Housing.

  • Implementation of Strategic Plan Goals This Agreement supports the County’s Strategic Plan, Goal 1, Operational Effectiveness/Fiscal Sustainability. This Agreement will provide revenue reimbursement to the Department for services rendered.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.