Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. With due respect, Mr Deputy President, I would have thought that having that ruling would be material to the debate that we are having. If that is the case, I would have thought that the normal procedure would be that the Deputy President would leave the chair until the ringing of the bells if we are waiting for a determination, because it impacts on whether we can have the debate that we are having. Hon XXXXXX XXXXX: I am in the middle of a speech. There is a question before the Chair and a member is on his feet speaking. All of this is quite out of order until such time as there is a break in the process. The point of order is quite out of order; indeed, a member’s speech cannot be interrupted to go on to some other business when the member is speaking to the question before the Chair. I seek your support in allowing me to continue my speech, Mr Deputy President. The DEPUTY PRESIDENT (Hon Xxxx Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx): My understanding is that prior to the suspension, the Leader of the House was on his feet with this particular process in motion. I believe that that process should be allowed to continue until the Leader of the House resumes his seat. That is my considered opinion. The Leader of the House was on his feet at six o’clock. That is my understanding of the procedure. I believe that to be a correct position. Xxx XXXXX XXXXXXX: By way of another point, I believe that the honourable member had raised a point of order, which was the matter that was discussed behind the Chair during the break. That point of order is yet to be resolved. The point of order interrupted the Leader of the House’s speech. Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx: No; I raised the point of order before the Leader of the House spoke. Xxx XXXXX XXXXXXX: Sorry; I do apologise. Hon Xxxxx X’Xxxxx: I bet you’re glad you stood up to say that! The DEPUTY PRESIDENT: Order, members! My initial comment was that the Leader of the House was on his feet. The President has indicated that he was not in a position at 7.30 pm to make a determination on the point of order. Given that that particular situation prevails, I believe that the Leader of the House has the call. Debate Resumed
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx means the Traditional Owner Group that consists of Aboriginal persons (Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx traditional owners) who:
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. Beijing Xxx Xxx Phoenix Healthcare Asset Management Co., Ltd.* (北京燕化鳳凰醫療資產管理有限公司), a limited liability company established under the laws of the PRC, and the sponsor of Xxx Xxx Hospital “YHHG” collectively, Xxx Xxx Hospital and 10 community clinics affiliated with Xxx Xxx Hospital * For identification purpose only By order of the Board China Resources Medical Holdings Company Limited XXXXX Xxxxxx Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer Beijing, 15 January 2019
Examples of Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx in a sentence
XxXxxx 2012 Family Trust – Portion II XX Xxxxxx Trust Company of Delaware 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xx Newark, DE 19713 The XxXxxx Family Limited Partnership Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx, NY 11514 The 1999 XxXxxx Family Limited Partnership Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx, NY 11514 MEMBERS Xxxxxxx XxXxxx Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx, NY 11514 Xxxxxxxxxxx X.
XxXxxx Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx, NY 11514 Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx, NY 11514 Xxxxx X.
XxXxxx, III Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx, NY 11514 Xxxxxxx X.
XxXxxx, General Partner 2,000,000 Class B Shares The 1999 XxXxxx Family Limited Partnership Public Flowers, Inc., General Partner 3,875,000 Class B Shares SCHEDULE B STOCKHOLDERS Xxxx XxXxxx 2005 Trust Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx, NY 11514 Xxxxx XxXxxx 2005 Trust Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx, NY 11514 Xxxxxxx XxXxxx 2005 Trust Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx, NY 11514 The Xxxxx X.
Xxxxxx 3000 Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxx Xxxxx, XX 00000 800-000-0000 As soon as practical following the Closing, Seller will deliver to the Company each certificate representing the Seller Stock so as to transfer the Seller Stock to Buyer.
More Definitions of Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. Address for Notice: [redacted: personal address] Securities: Class and Type (i.e. Value Securities or Surplus Securities) Number Certificate(s) (if applicable) Common Shares 1,000,000 Schedule “B” to Escrow Agreement Acknowledgment and Agreement to be Bound I acknowledge that the securities listed in the attached Schedule “A” (the “escrow securities”) have been or will be transferred to me and that the escrow securities are subject to an Escrow Agreement dated (the “Escrow Agreement”). For other good and valuable consideration, I agree to be bound by the Escrow Agreement in respect of the escrow securities, as if I were an original signatory to the Escrow Agreement. Dated at _ on . Where the transferee is an individual: Signed, sealed and delivered by ) [Transferee] in the presence of: ) ) ) Signature of Witness ) ) ) [Transferee] ) Name of Witness ) ) Where the transferee is not an individual: [Transferee] _ Authorized signatory _
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. You didn’t listen to what I said, did you? Hon XXXXXX XXXXX: I listened to what the member said. Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx: I said we should negotiate behind the Chair to resolve that.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. The problem with the Leader of the House is that he has spent so long here that he has got into the habit of concocting arguments to suit him, and he uses the end product to justify how he got there in the first place. Hon Xxxxxx Xxxxx operates in a fascinating way. He does not listen to what anyone else says. He makes assumptions about our position. He comes to a conclusion that proves that we have always believed what he claims was our motive in the first place for reaching that conclusion. It says a lot about the way in which his mind operates. It is not the way in which we operate. The Leader of the House should go back to his speech on the Xxxxxx Island bill. He said that it was a bad bill. He said that it should be done in a different way, but he still supported the bill. Hon Xxxxxx Xxxxx: Exactly right.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. We are not going as far as the Leader of the House. We are saying that this bill has some implications, and we want to be clear about those implications. We want the people of Western Australia to know and understand those implications. We will then support the bill. We are not taking the approach that the Leader of the House took, which was to say one thing and to do another. We are saying that we want to support the legislation but we want to make sure that we and the people of Western Australia are very clear about the implications of this agreement. I particularly want to know what the implications will be for the rail access arrangements. That is not an outrageous or unreasonable thing to say. I also pick up on one comment the Leader of the House just made, which was that the rejection of a state agreement act would have a significant impact on sovereign risk. That is the biggest load of rubbish I have heard for a long time.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. But a xxxx would for the railway.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. What about the Xxxxxx–Karara railway? Hon XXXXXX XXXXX: That will link up with the state railway system, and it will become a state asset. So, it is being built under the Public Works Act. A private railway line that is being built for a private company cannot be built under the Public Works Act; therefore, we need a mechanism, such as the one we are using here, to build that line. As I have said, down the track there may well be other ways of doing this, rather than have a state agreement act to allow it to happen. The Oakajee line will probably link up with the state system in the future. But even if that is not the case initially, it will be built by the private sector, and upon completion it will be provided to the state, and the state will then lease back the line to the companies to use. Therefore, that line can be built under the Public Works Act. Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx: Will not this line, at the conclusion of the state agreement, revert to the state? Hon XXXXXX XXXXX: Yes. I mentioned that last night. Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx: Therefore, it is the same as what will happen with the Xxxxxx–Karara line, and with the Oakajee line. Effectively, for the next 49 years they will be owned by the state and will be leased to the company, and at the end of that 49 years they will revert to the state.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. I knew with your interest you would automatically raise it. Hon XXXXXX XXXXX: When I read that clause, when we were debating the Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Act, it was a very cursory glance. When I read it, I did not pay a lot of attention to the word “discriminatory”. Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxx helped me out on that occasion. I was reading it in the context of there being charges and I thought it was a bit over the top. However, it has been drawn to my attention that a clause on discriminatory charges is an appropriate clause and has been contained in a lot of state agreement acts for a very long time. I was therefore wrong in my criticism of the previous government over that.