{"component": "definition", "props": {"groups": [{"samples": [{"hash": "58ieD3SWZcl", "uri": "https://casedocs.omniagentsolutions.com/cmsvol2/pub_47373/2986d965-f0f2-403b-8f06-a9cb099cd950_6855.pdf", "label": "casedocs.omniagentsolutions.com", "score": 11.1108827591, "published": false}, {"hash": "lcycqEn9QNJ", "uri": "https://casedocs.omniagentsolutions.com/cmsvol2/pub_47373/b592886b-0563-45c6-bc2c-d8d1547f206e_8575.pdf", "label": "casedocs.omniagentsolutions.com", "score": 11.09171772, "published": false}, {"hash": "dcwMLOhrIMz", "uri": "https://casedocs.omniagentsolutions.com/cmsvol2/pub_47373/6ea3647b-4f97-4f90-82ea-27d97b0ef054_8362.pdf", "label": "casedocs.omniagentsolutions.com", "score": 11.0848731995, "published": false}], "size": 14, "snippet_links": [{"key": "award-or-decision", "type": "clause", "offset": [41, 58]}], "snippet": "means any Prepetition verdict, judgment, award or decision of a", "hash": "2810bd6e5d75a73ca5cc7b8aa44ce9e7", "id": 1}, {"samples": [{"hash": "1o0yAmZDGXR", "uri": "https://iccdb.hrlc.net/documents/implementations/word/ArmeniaProcedureCode.doc", "label": "iccdb.hrlc.net", "score": 8.5181379318, "published": false}, {"hash": "jAXwEwGH2SI", "uri": "https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2013/11/08/Criminal%20Procedure%20Code%20.pdf", "label": "www.justice.gov", "score": 8.1704311371, "published": false}, {"hash": "iQLUIhLwNc2", "uri": "https://legalexpert.am/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Armenia-Criminal-Procedure-Code-1998E-1.pdf", "label": "legalexpert.am", "score": 3.0, "published": false}], "size": 4, "snippet_links": [{"key": "court-of-appeals", "type": "clause", "offset": [59, 75]}, {"key": "other-issues", "type": "clause", "offset": [182, 194]}], "snippet": "means a decision handed down by a first-instance court and court of appeals at its session to adjudge the defendant guilty or innocent, impose punishment or reject it, and determine other issues;", "hash": "2b3cf0150d554a082bddaa9496329393", "id": 2}, {"samples": [{"hash": "1Z88KVGMwHu", "uri": "https://mdcourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules/reports/177threport.pdf", "label": "Notice", "score": 10.6235456467, "published": false}, {"hash": "e5d1Vvo13d7", "uri": "https://mdcourts.gov/sites/default/files/import/rules/rodocs/181ro.pdf", "label": "mdcourts.gov", "score": 6.9233403206, "published": false}, {"hash": "ankkRoXNw9J", "uri": "https://www.courts.state.md.us/sites/default/files/rules/reports/181streport.pdf", "label": "www.courts.state.md.us", "score": 6.894592762, "published": false}], "size": 4, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-decision", "type": "clause", "offset": [33, 45]}, {"key": "the-court", "type": "clause", "offset": [49, 58]}, {"key": "pertaining-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [59, 72]}], "snippet": "means the finding of the jury or the decision of the court pertaining to the merits of the offense charged.", "hash": "e8de860d6f2e0d2ac9e0cfcb44153753", "id": 3}, {"samples": [{"hash": "l7ho5OqWEVc", "uri": "/contracts/l7ho5OqWEVc#verdict", "label": "Court of Appeals Case", "score": 16.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "bcgJncRjMK0", "uri": "/contracts/bcgJncRjMK0#verdict", "label": "Court of Appeals Case", "score": 16.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "137OEU3gBAt", "uri": "/contracts/137OEU3gBAt#verdict", "label": "Court of Appeals Case", "score": 16.0, "published": true}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "judgment-entered", "type": "clause", "offset": [12, 28]}, {"key": "case-evaluation", "type": "definition", "offset": [88, 103]}, {"key": "this-action", "type": "definition", "offset": [185, 196]}, {"key": "order-of-dismissal-with-prejudice", "type": "clause", "offset": [254, 287]}, {"key": "the-definition-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [301, 318]}, {"key": "an-order", "type": "definition", "offset": [470, 478]}, {"key": "same-practical-effect", "type": "definition", "offset": [515, 536]}, {"key": "no-cause-of-action", "type": "clause", "offset": [553, 571]}], "snippet": "includes \u201ca judgment entered as a result of a ruling on a motion after rejection of the case evaluation.\u201d MCR 2.403(O)(2)(c). We acknowledge that the dismissal of plaintiff\u2019s claims in this action was not the result of a ruling on a motion. However, an \u201corder of dismissal with prejudice falls within the definition of \u2018verdict\u2019 under MCR 2.403(O)(2)(c).\u201d Broadway Coney Island, Inc v Commercial Union Ins Co, 217 Mich App 109, 114; 550 NW2d 838 (1996). This is because an order of dismissal with prejudice has the same practical effect as a verdict of no cause of action, and should therefore by treated as such. Id.", "hash": "d620e578e94078b3cc63fde4f560367f", "id": 4}, {"samples": [{"hash": "gBE7Qcib3dD", "uri": "https://www.acep.org/globalassets/uploads/uploaded-files/acep/clinical-and-practice-management/resources/medical-legal/so-you-have-been-sued.pdf", "label": "www.acep.org", "score": 5.7761807442, "published": false}, {"hash": "aE2jfcpDj9O", "uri": "https://www.acep.org/siteassets/uploads/uploaded-files/acep/clinical-and-practice-management/resources/medical-legal/sohavebeensued.pdf", "label": "www.acep.org", "score": 2.1184120178, "published": false}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-case", "type": "definition", "offset": [11, 19]}, {"key": "standards-of-care", "type": "definition", "offset": [136, 153]}, {"key": "below-standards", "type": "definition", "offset": [162, 177]}, {"key": "and-finally", "type": "clause", "offset": [258, 269]}, {"key": "money-damages", "type": "clause", "offset": [289, 302]}], "snippet": "means that the case has gone to trial and the jury has made a decision. The verdict is the jury\u2019s decision as to whether or not you met standards of care or fell below standards of care; and if you fell below standards of care, whether you caused an injury; and finally, the amount of the money damages which will be paid as a result of the injury.", "hash": "051fa2d554c51dd7520681ac729d029a", "id": 5}, {"samples": [{"hash": "eEKUXdWM1vD", "uri": "/contracts/eEKUXdWM1vD#verdict", "label": "Merchant Processing Agreement", "score": 27.3258037567, "published": true}, {"hash": "d9yEUxUvmTB", "uri": "/contracts/d9yEUxUvmTB#verdict", "label": "Merchant Processing Agreement", "score": 26.2648868561, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-final-award", "type": "clause", "offset": [7, 22]}, {"key": "the-arbitrator", "type": "clause", "offset": [26, 40]}], "snippet": "means \u201cthe final award by the arbitrator;\u201d", "hash": "9d7e6876f03ef4e71d3c56f863c2dd2d", "id": 6}, {"samples": [{"hash": "2529qqJkGRK", "uri": "/contracts/2529qqJkGRK#verdict", "label": "General Liability Coverage", "score": 34.796333313, "published": true}, {"hash": "dust6o8OpWg", "uri": "/contracts/dust6o8OpWg#verdict", "label": "Property & Casualty Coverage Agreement", "score": 33.5929115611, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-facts", "type": "clause", "offset": [19, 28]}, {"key": "amount-of-damages", "type": "clause", "offset": [47, 64]}, {"key": "a-member", "type": "definition", "offset": [81, 89]}, {"key": "cause-of-action", "type": "definition", "offset": [99, 114]}], "snippet": "means the trier of the facts must identify the amount of damages awarded against a Member for each cause of action or allegation of damage made against that Member.", "hash": "a7a2d79e07a9e08ccc5cd00f248f93a9", "id": 7}, {"samples": [{"hash": "f4uNpr1eNMd", "uri": "https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/bill/2007/33/eng/initiated/b3307s.pdf", "label": "data.oireachtas.ie", "score": 3.0, "published": false}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "in-relation-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 14]}, {"key": "pursuant-to-section", "type": "definition", "offset": [68, 87]}], "snippet": "in relation to an inquest, means the verdict returned by an inquest pursuant to section 46. 30", "hash": "186a6d82b0b28028928d9b4b2c3b1cda", "id": 8}, {"samples": [{"hash": "kkv4JjmyljJ", "uri": "http://www.qurtubaislamic.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/QIA-code-of-conduct.pdf", "label": "www.qurtubaislamic.co.za", "score": 9.1300477982, "published": false}], "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-decision", "type": "clause", "offset": [6, 18]}, {"key": "the-student", "type": "clause", "offset": [37, 48]}, {"key": "the-hearing", "type": "clause", "offset": [110, 121]}], "snippet": "means the decision on whether or not the Student is guilty of the allegations levelled against him or her, by the Hearing Chairperson.", "hash": "78f87b63cd3bc86eb9a861e96f449942", "id": 9}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4QTK7GkQU5I", "uri": "https://document.epiq11.com/document/getdocumentbycode?docId=4094684&projectCode=MSJ&source=DM", "label": "document.epiq11.com", "score": 11.3011636734, "published": false}], "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "award-or-decision", "type": "clause", "offset": [29, 46]}], "snippet": "means any verdict, judgment, award or decision of a court, arbitrator, mediator", "hash": "7f0c9500fb936f0e4d870a53a13f8f9c", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClQSTmoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjALEhpEZWZpbml0aW9uU25pcHBldEdyb3VwX3Y1NiIQdmVyZGljdCMwMDAwMDAwYQyiAQJlbhgAIAA=", "definition": {"title": "Verdict", "size": 41, "snippet": "means any Prepetition verdict, judgment, award or decision of a", "id": "verdict", "examples": ["If a party timely requests to have the jury determine forfeit- ure, the government must submit a proposed Special <strong>Verdict</strong> Form listing each property subject to forfeiture and asking the jury to determine whether the government has es- tablished the requisite nexus between the property and the offense committed by the defendant.", "<strong>Verdict</strong> will be determined by the University Official or President.", "Given the fact that this Convention and its Protocol are specifically aimed at situations of armed conflict and occupation, Netherlands and Ukraine are both parties and its principles are generally considered as binding customary international law, one may wonder why not.52 The central provision is that states \u2018undertake to prohibit, prevent and, if necessary, put a stop to any form of theft, pillage or misappropriation of, 50 <strong>Verdict</strong> (n.", "Nothing in this Permanent Injunction shall prohibit the Enjoined Parties from providing service or technical support for a Product for which Broadcom is or has been compensated under a jury\u2019s <strong>Verdict</strong> or for which the sale was permitted under provision II(b) above or provision VI below.", "Panel must complete a <strong>Verdict</strong> Form, which specifies their findings.", "Ukraine, on the one hand, bases its claim on a Decree of 2nd February 2000 designating the collections of the four Crimean museums as Ukrainian State property.29 More generally, Ukraine invokes Ukrainian laws vesting ownership of all archaeological finds in the 27 <strong>Verdict</strong> (n.", "The <strong>Verdict</strong> Form shall be marked \u201cCONFIDENTIAL\u201d and must be signed by all Panel members that are in agreement with the <strong>verdict</strong>.", "Evaluation \u2022 Potential <strong>Verdict</strong> Value \u2022 Comparative Fault Analysis \u2022 Settlement Discussion summary \u2022 Probability of Defense <strong>Verdict</strong> Throughout trial, a daily trial status update shall be provided to PRISM by defense counsel, the Member, or the Third-Party Administrator.", "The restrictions on the assets were reaffirmed in the Tax <strong>Verdict</strong> and form part of the Tax Penalty payable by the Company.", "Analysis Report: Set of human and machine-readable files describing security-relevant findings for a Sample, e.g., threat indicators, related network traffic, or <strong>Verdict</strong>."], "related": [["writ", "Writ", "Writ"], ["decree", "Decree", "Decree"], ["injunction", "Injunction", "Injunction"], ["appeal", "Appeal", "Appeal"], ["stipulation", "Stipulation", "Stipulation"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-18T05:45:24+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}