{"component": "definition", "props": {"groups": [{"snippet_links": [], "snippet": "Analysis 2a: metric selection results. Metric - stressor correlation was consistent (yes) if the sign of the correlation was as expected. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 rank correlation between the EQR, calculated using the formula EQR1, and the stressor is reported. A metric was redundant (redundancy=yes) if correlated (r>0.", "samples": [{"hash": "cbvSv3YTNpZ", "uri": "/contracts/cbvSv3YTNpZ#table-8", "label": "Grant Agreement", "score": 33.0865443575, "published": true}, {"hash": "fG4kUsK9T7o", "uri": "/contracts/fG4kUsK9T7o#table-8", "label": "Grant Agreement", "score": 21.7761806982, "published": true}], "size": 2, "hash": "3b826352cae384cc85138a15ee93ced7", "id": 1}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "performance-indicator", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 21]}], "snippet": "Performance indicator for measuring sustainability of buildings (Umbria Region, 2013)", "samples": [{"hash": "bb0EFfTrfB1", "uri": "/contracts/bb0EFfTrfB1#table-8", "label": "Grant Agreement", "score": 23.0793976728, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "f12383f9d7c2b4bb6f8f39ca056ade02", "id": 2}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "uttar-pradesh", "type": "definition", "offset": [36, 49]}, {"key": "gram-panchayat", "type": "definition", "offset": [110, 124]}, {"key": "zilla-parishad", "type": "definition", "offset": [143, 157]}, {"key": "national-institute", "type": "definition", "offset": [360, 378]}, {"key": "rural-development", "type": "clause", "offset": [382, 399]}], "snippet": "Elected Women members in Kerala and Uttar Pradesh at all three levels of governance in 199931 (Unit: 100,000) Gram Panchayat Panchayati Samiti Zilla Parishad State Women Total % Women Total % Women Total % KE 3883 10270 37.81 563 1547 36.39 104 300 34.67 UP 174410 682670 25.55 14002 58165 24.07 648 2551 25.4 Source: India Panchayat Raj Report, 2001, Vol. I- National Institute of Rural Development", "samples": [{"hash": "k6YTuFFklcJ", "uri": "/contracts/k6YTuFFklcJ#table-8", "label": "Distribution Agreement", "score": 21.2744322071, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "801817a598407cf8ecaadb921c4fe677", "id": 3}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "covid-period", "type": "definition", "offset": [143, 155]}, {"key": "descriptive-statistics", "type": "clause", "offset": [889, 911]}, {"key": "the-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [915, 920]}, {"key": "the-pre", "type": "clause", "offset": [952, 959]}, {"key": "in-addition-to-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [1042, 1060]}, {"key": "also-included", "type": "clause", "offset": [1121, 1134]}], "snippet": "\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 ratio: mean difference analysis: gender. male female complete period mean difference Mean SR 0.2812 0.1008 0.1804 (0.6999) (0.4265) pre-Covid period male female Mean SR 0.2449 0.0397 0.205212609 (0.7804) (0.4106) Covid-period male female Mean SR 0.5761 0.5280 0.048148003 (1.3513) (1.4439) Note: This table analyses the differences in the mean SR between genders in each period. Mean differences are listed in the last column. No significance of results is measured, but none were found to be significant. panel A: pre-Covid mean SD S K male \ud835\udefc 0.0021 0.0116 4.4660 28.4983 \u00df\ud835\udc40\ud835\udc58\ud835\udc61 0.5347 0.7307 0.7728 2.6923 female \ud835\udefc 0.0002 0.0067 1.8102 4.5929 \u00df\ud835\udc40\ud835\udc58\ud835\udc61 0.7472 0.8120 0.8608 0.9613 Panel B: Covid period mean SD S K male \ud835\udefc 0.0071 0.0227 2.7942 10.9900 \u00df\ud835\udc40\ud835\udc58\ud835\udc61 0.4424 0.9598 2.4969 11.9720 female \ud835\udefc 0.0049 0.0170 1.4469 2.8871 \u00df\ud835\udc40\ud835\udc58\ud835\udc61 0.3515 0.7349 -0.6118 -0.0820 note: This table presents the descriptive statistics of the \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 alpha. The table presents the pre-Covid descriptive statistics in panel and the Covid period statistics in panel B. In addition to the \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u03b1, the coefficient \u00df\ud835\udc56,\ud835\udc40\ud835\udc3e\ud835\udc47 descriptive statistics are also included.", "samples": [{"hash": "8v6KGZJD50N", "uri": "/contracts/8v6KGZJD50N#table-8", "label": "Master's Dissertation", "score": 31.7959616097, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "0aa50f97d3602b9ffab58d30ffa39fef", "id": 4}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "frequency-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 12]}, {"key": "depending-on-how", "type": "clause", "offset": [223, 239]}], "snippet": "Frequency of Slut as Address by Relationship Survey responses for slut demonstrated similar patterns, though at an overall lower frequency. The reported use of address for slut by relationship demonstrated a slight pattern depending on how close the speaker considered their addressee. In Table 8, all of the", "samples": [{"hash": "gGnadGtSqVh", "uri": "/contracts/gGnadGtSqVh#table-8", "label": "Distribution Agreement", "score": 25.2843583056, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "8723556c06b944603e65f90f2b29c397", "id": 5}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "descriptive-statistics", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 22]}, {"key": "social-media-data", "type": "definition", "offset": [27, 44]}, {"key": "table-9", "type": "definition", "offset": [45, 52]}, {"key": "program-characteristics", "type": "clause", "offset": [134, 157]}, {"key": "table-10", "type": "definition", "offset": [233, 241]}, {"key": "table-11", "type": "clause", "offset": [265, 273]}, {"key": "relationship-between", "type": "clause", "offset": [302, 322]}, {"key": "online-program", "type": "definition", "offset": [323, 337]}], "snippet": "Descriptive Statistics for Social Media Data Table 9: Descriptive Statistics for Advertising Data, Advertisement Characteristics, and Program Characteristics Advertising Data and Advertisement Characteristics Program Characteristics Table 10: Time Ad Instances Air Table 11: Model-free Evidence on the Relationship between Online Program Engagement and Online Shopping Activity", "samples": [{"hash": "jaBJjQi1T8H", "uri": "/contracts/jaBJjQi1T8H#table-8", "label": "Distribution Agreement", "score": 23.6825039132, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "f50c4b6b64e056b573ed9ee7681dd58b", "id": 6}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "material-categories", "type": "clause", "offset": [20, 39]}, {"key": "tier-1", "type": "definition", "offset": [40, 46]}, {"key": "developed-materials", "type": "definition", "offset": [47, 66]}, {"key": "tier-2", "type": "definition", "offset": [67, 73]}, {"key": "property-data", "type": "definition", "offset": [220, 233]}, {"key": "previous-studies", "type": "clause", "offset": [415, 431]}, {"key": "the-open", "type": "clause", "offset": [436, 444]}, {"key": "engineering-analyses", "type": "clause", "offset": [480, 500]}, {"key": "material-properties", "type": "definition", "offset": [513, 532]}, {"key": "high-priority", "type": "clause", "offset": [554, 567]}], "snippet": "HSCoE Metal Hydride Material Categories Tier 1 Developed Materials Tier 2 Developing Materials Down-selected Materials Metal Hydrides NaAlH 4 2LiNH 2 +MgH 2 Mg(NH 2 ) 2 +MgH 2 +2LiH TiCr(Mn)H 2 MgH 2 Mg 2 NiH 4 Material property data for the metal hydride materials of interest (particularly Tier 1 and Tier 2 materials) were collected from a variety of sources, which included MHCoE reports and investigator data, previous studies and the open literature. To perform preliminary engineering analyses several key material properties were identified as a high priority requirement. These key material properties included:", "samples": [{"hash": "iuqudYvhFbG", "uri": "https://sti.srs.gov/fulltext/SRNL-STI-2014-00226.pdf", "label": "sti.srs.gov", "score": 8.5763175907, "published": false}], "size": 1, "hash": "2f477114010101142c492ecbae3fec15", "id": 7}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "transportation-element", "type": "definition", "offset": [21, 43]}, {"key": "comprehensive-plan", "type": "definition", "offset": [57, 75]}, {"key": "this-chapter", "type": "definition", "offset": [102, 114]}], "snippet": "means Table 8 of the Transportation Element of the 2008? Comprehensive Plan, which is incorporated in this chapter by this reference.", "samples": [{"hash": "lMeldoOOnN8", "uri": "https://mccmeetingspublic.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/lynden-meet-1b3379169b4542b7813a553d0ce76d63/ITEM-Attachment-001-799ed278e8094bf5bbb32786a25fc799.pdf", "label": "mccmeetingspublic.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net", "score": 11.7663782016, "published": false}], "size": 1, "hash": "5385bbf1d86e0b30a33abe74dff3fe70", "id": 8}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "protocol-state", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 40]}], "snippet": "The helper methods on the protocol state.", "samples": [{"hash": "5YR2bfdjNi0", "uri": "https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1407.pdf", "label": "eprint.iacr.org", "score": 13.8973305955, "published": false}], "size": 1, "hash": "c1d89b3dd97505e9d5ad0c0213771aaa", "id": 9}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "age-category", "type": "definition", "offset": [18, 30]}, {"key": "table-9", "type": "definition", "offset": [82, 89]}, {"key": "health-facility", "type": "clause", "offset": [128, 143]}, {"key": "table-10", "type": "definition", "offset": [213, 221]}, {"key": "table-11", "type": "clause", "offset": [380, 388]}, {"key": "general-screening", "type": "definition", "offset": [390, 407]}, {"key": "yes-no", "type": "definition", "offset": [415, 421]}, {"key": "figure-10", "type": "definition", "offset": [463, 472]}, {"key": "table-12", "type": "clause", "offset": [492, 500]}], "snippet": "Children observed Age category Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent Total 207 100 Table 9: single reasons for bringing child to health facility. n = 207 Reason for bringing child to health facility Count Column % Table 10: Combined reasons for bringing child to health facility. n = 207 Reason for bringing child to health facility Count Column % Health Worker Practice Screening Table 11: General Screening Action Yes No n General screening Screening % of cases Figure 10: General screening Table 12: Assessments Task Cases % n Assessments on child", "samples": [{"hash": "hWLoe9Ky8E", "uri": "/contracts/hWLoe9Ky8E#table-8", "label": "Cooperative Agreement", "score": 19.0643394935, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "9c9e644c91b7d0094bf1b93503ca5e66", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClQSTmoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjALEhpEZWZpbml0aW9uU25pcHBldEdyb3VwX3Y1NiIQdGFibGUtOCMwMDAwMDAwYQyiAQJlbhgAIAA=", "definition": {"title": "Table 8", "snippet": "Analysis 2a: metric selection results. Metric - stressor correlation was consistent (yes) if the sign of the correlation was as expected. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 rank correlation between the EQR, calculated using the formula EQR1, and the stressor is reported. A metric was redundant (redundancy=yes) if correlated (r>0.", "size": 17, "id": "table-8", "examples": ["As <strong>Table 8</strong> shows, a majority of students live on their own, most commonly renting their accommodations either off campus (15%) or on campus (40%).", "As <strong>Table 8</strong> shows, the personal characteristics of students who participated in the 2013 survey are mostly similar, with a few exceptions.", "As <strong>Table 8</strong> shows, a majority of students live on their own, most commonly renting their accommodations either off campus (52%) or on campus (3%).", "Software Subscriptions for Red Hat Enterprise Linux \u2013 Academic Editions are subject to the additional terms and conditions, including Use Cases set forth in <strong>Table 8</strong> below.", "Subclause 6.1.2: The settling band default value in <strong>Table 8</strong> shall be based on the maximum of 2.5% of change or 0.5% of nameplate capacity.", "Cases exceeding <strong>Table 8</strong>, or 300%, or its equivalent must be submitted facultatively.", "Together with the offset multipliers identified in <strong>Table 8</strong>, page 100, of the RWP, they produce a 2:1 mitigation ratio within each CHAT category.", "Red Hat Enterprise Linux \u2013 Academic Edition Software Subscriptions for Red Hat Enterprise Linux \u2013 Academic Editions are subject to the additional terms and conditions, including Use Cases set forth in <strong>Table 8</strong> below.", "The mortality rating on any one risk must not exceed <strong>Table 8</strong>, or 300%, or its equivalent on a flat extra premium basis.", "If the actual Service Availability is less than the Service Availability Service Level provided in Clause 1.3.3 (Service Availability \u2013 Service Level Agreement) above, then Customer will be entitled to receive a credit against the Qualifying Charges for the affected Users where the Severity Level-1 Incident occurred in accordance with <strong>Table 8</strong>."], "related": [["table-2", "Table 2", "Table 2"], ["table-3", "Table 3", "Table 3"], ["table-4", "Table 4", "Table 4"], ["table-a", "Table A", "Table A"], ["table-e", "Table E", "Table E"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-06T21:58:36+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}