Redacted Copy definition

Redacted Copy. If an Offeror submits a proposal that contains information claimed to be confidential or protected, the Offeror MUST submit two separate proposals: one redacted version for public release, with all protected business confidential information either blacked-out or removed, clearly marked as "Redacted Version"; and one non-redacted version for evaluation purposes clearly marked as "Protected Business Confidential." As provided above, this document is to constitute Offeror’s redacted proposal along with Attachment F. If there is no protected/redacted information, provide a document labeled as indicated below with “None” in the body of the document. Failure to comply with this section of the RFP releases the Lead State, NASPO ValuePoint, and Participating Entities from any obligation or liability arising from the inadvertent release of Offeror information. Title this document upload – [Offeror Name] Redacted Proposal

Split View

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Get StartedSchedule a Demo

Redacted Copy and “redacted copies” means a copy or copies of original

Redacted Copy means, with respect to (a) any Contract or (b) any Record (other than an Invoice) that contains confidential, proprietary, nonpublic or commercially sensitive information, a photocopy or facsimile copy thereof as to which the Seller has redacted only such confidential, proprietary, nonpublic or commercially sensitive information.

Examples of Redacted Copy in a sentence

• This redacted copy shall contain the Department’s solicitation name, number, and the Bidder’s name on the cover, and shall be clearly titled “Redacted Copy.” The Redacted Copy should only redact those portions of material that the Bidder claims is confidential, proprietary, trade secret or otherwise not subject to disclosure.

• In the event of a request for public records pursuant to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, the Florida Constitution or other authority, to which documents that are marked as confidential are responsive, the Department shall provide the Redacted Copy to the requestor.

• In the event of a request for public records pursuant to Chapter 119, F.S., the Florida Constitution or other authority, to which documents that are marked as confidential are responsive, the Department will provide the Redacted Copy to the requestor.

• In the event of a request for public records, pursuant to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, the Florida Constitution, or other authority, to which documents that are marked as confidential are responsive, the Department will provide the Redacted Copy to the requestor.

• This redacted copy shall contain the Department’s solicitation name, number, and the name of the responding Vendor on the cover, and is to be clearly titled “Redacted Copy.” The Redacted Copy should only redact those portions of material that the Vendor claims is confidential, proprietary, trade secret or otherwise not subject to disclosure.

• This redacted copy shall contain the Department’s solicitation name, number, and the Respondent’s name on the cover, and shall be clearly titled “Redacted Copy.” The Redacted Copy should only redact those portions of material that the Respondent claims is confidential, proprietary, trade secret or otherwise not subject to disclosure.

• If the Respondent fails to submit a Redacted Copy with its response, the Department is authorized to produce all documents, data or records submitted by the Respondent in answer to a public records request for these records.

• The redacted copy must state the Department’s solicitation name and number, and the Respondent’s name on the cover, and must clearly state that it is a “Redacted Copy.” The Redacted Copy must be provided to the Department at the same time the Respondent submits its response to the solicitation, and must only redact those portions of the response that are claimed to be confidential, proprietary, or trade secret.

• This redacted copy will be clearly titled “Redacted Copy.” The Redacted Copy must only exclude or obliterate those exact portions which are claimed confidential, proprietary or trade secret.

• If a public records request is made for the Proposal, the Department will provide the requestor access to the Redacted Copy, bearing the Respondent’s assertion of exemption from disclosure.

More Definitions of Redacted Copy

Redacted Copy. If an Offeror submits a proposal that contains information claimed to be confidential or protected, the Offeror MUST submit two separate proposals: one redacted version for public release, with all protected business confidential information either blacked-out or removed, clearly marked as "Redacted Version"; and one non- redacted version for evaluation purposes clearly marked as "Protected Business Confidential." All materials submitted become the property of the State of Utah. Materials may be evaluated by anyone designated by the State as part of the evaluation committee. Materials submitted may be returned only at the State's option.

Redacted Copy. If an Offeror submits a proposal that contains information claimed to be confidential or protected, the Offeror MUST submit two separate proposals: one redacted version for public release, with all protected business confidential information either blacked- out or removed, clearly marked as "Redacted Version"; and one non-redacted version for evaluation purposes clearly marked as "Protected Business Confidential."

Redacted Copy along with an electronic copy on CD either in Microsoft Word or PDF format of same. The City will accept flash drives or USB sticks. These items must be submitted to the City as a complete sealed proposal. No other distribution of the proposal shall be made by the Offeror. Proposals must be submitted by the date and time stated in the solicitation. Proposals will be date and time stamped upon receipt and retained unopened in a secure location until proposal opening. No consideration will be given to date of postmark or error in delivery to incorrect address. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure timely and correct delivery of proposal.

Redacted Copy. If an Offeror submits a proposal that contains information claimed to be confidential or protected, the Offeror MUST submit two separate proposals: one redacted version for public release, with all protected business confidential information either blacked-out or removed, clearly marked as "Redacted Version"; and one non-redacted version for evaluation purposes clearly marked as "Protected Business Confidential." As provided above, this document is to constitute Offeror’s redacted proposal along with Attachment F. If there is no protected/redacted information, provide a document labeled as indicated below with “None” in the body of the document. Failure to comply with this section of the RFP releases the Lead State, NASPO ValuePoint, and Participating Entities from any obligation or liability arising from the inadvertent release of Offeror information. Title this document upload – [Offeror Name] Redacted Proposal The Lead State discourages exceptions to contract terms and conditions in the RFP and the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. Exceptions may cause a Proposal to be rejected as nonresponsive when, in the sole judgment of the Lead State (and its evaluation committee) the Proposal appears to be conditioned on the exception or correction of what is deemed to be a deficiency or unacceptable exception and would require a substantial proposal rewrite to correct. Offerors should identify or seek to clarify any problems with contract language or any other document contained within this RFP through their written inquiries about the RFP using the process in Section 2.1. Moreover, Offerors are cautioned that award may be made on receipt of initial proposals without clarification or an opportunity for discussion, and the nature of exceptions would be evaluated. Further, the nature of exceptions will be considered in the competitive range determination if one is conducted. In the sole discretion of the Lead State, exceptions may be evaluated to determine the extent to which; the alternative language or approach poses unreasonable, additional risk to the state; the exception inhibits achieving the objectives of the RFP; or the exception’s ambiguity makes evaluation difficult and a fair resolution (available to all Offerors) impractical given the timeframe for the RFP. Exceptions may result in a Proposal being rejected as nonresponsive and the Lead State is under no obligation to consider exceptions. Proposed exceptions and/or additions to Att...

Redacted Copy along with an electronic copy on CD either in Microsoft Word or PDF format of same. These items must be submitted to the City as a complete sealed proposal. No other distribution of the proposal shall be made by the Offeror. Proposals must be submitted by the date and time stated in the solicitation. Proposals will be date and time stamped upon receipt and retained unopened in a secure location until proposal opening. No consideration will be given to date of postmark or error in delivery to incorrect address. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure timely and correct delivery of proposal.