Pussy Grabs Back definition
Pussy Grabs Back is an effective rhetorical call because it reached this tipping point. One can operate rhetorically and proceed with one’s argument without needing to spend time on contextualization. Rather, because of shared knowledge from viral online content, the speaker can proceed in medias res. The original voice, however, did not expect her content to become viral. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ did not intend for her contribution to ultimately define the conversation. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ spoke as an individual woman perhaps drawing upon the anger of other women, but she did not intentionally speak for them with presumed or legitimate authority, as defined by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ did not speak intending for women to rally behind her, as ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ did. However, as ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ phrase gained traction across the digital realm, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ contribution reached viral levels of success, they assumed the responsibility given to her by the masses via retweets. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ voice. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ voice. It is hers, yet it is not hers. It is only the voice of the masses because it was once hers, and yet the retweeted voice is not hers. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ may have authored the image, yet her voice is framed by other voices, asserting their own authority. ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ first tweet may demonstrate a spontaneous rhetorical call, but the intentionality behind ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ image renders it a purposeful rhetorical appeal, similar to the “Declaration of Sentiments.” Though the first tweet must be recognized, it is the carefully considered and deliberate second post with the constructed image that occupies the bulk of my analysis. Without such distinctions, aspects of the rhetorical triangle become increasingly challenging to concretely define in digital spaces. Though the speaker and audience shift and expand exponentially, the occasion, subject, tone, and relative purpose remain stable. The scale at which these operate, however, also increases exponentially. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ purpose reaches across multiple realms. Because the authority of the female voice must constantly be asserted, her speaking at all is a claim to agency, an assertion of her right to speak and of the validity of her voice. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ message of subversion also demonstrates an intention to destabilize the message from the privileged male voice. She asserts her authority while disrupting established authority. Additionally, the fact that she subverts the privileged voice through appeals to emotion – through anger – illustrates both the progress from first-wave feminism and the refus...
Pussy Grabs Back is rightfully criticized for catering only to cisgender women and reflecting trans-exclusionary ideas.
Pussy Grabs Back reflects a quintessential example of the Subversive Echo in contemporary feminism. Comparing strategies of the Subversive Echo, found throughout feminist waves, provides rich material to analyze and better understand power dynamics of the female voice. Though the manifestation of the “Pussy Grabs Back” Subversive Echo differs from its feminist precursors, it ultimately reflects the same overall strategy. This Subversive Echo gained widespread recognition within mere hours of the original recording’s release. The echo’s success relied upon common knowledge of the recording and expected reactions of widespread disapproval, disgust, or anger. Based on this common knowledge, it presumed the resulting emotional response. On the other hand, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ Echo in the “Declaration of Sentiments” relied upon common knowledge of the Declaration of Independence, a text published nearly a century before her appeal, and its widespread approval. Condensed temporalities, therefore, is one trait embodied by modern rhetorical movements, simply due to the world in which they operate. Rhetorical strategies in contemporary feminism also employ affective appeals more directly than its predecessors, thanks in part to their predecessors’ work as well as new mediums of communication. Twitter allows a more informal and more emotional appeal than, say, an official convention presenting a signed declaration. The impact of technology, consequently, cannot be overstated. Not only has technology impacted the mediums through which feminist rhetorical appeals are made, but it also influences the speed and tonality of these appeals. Furthermore, it allows more individuals to be included in resistance efforts. While a select few (white, privileged, heteronormative) women authored and distributed the “Declaration of Sentiments,” the mantra “Pussy Grabs Back” gained traction through widespread participation via online mediums. It became identifiable and effective because of its accessibility.23 The phrase arose on Twitter after user ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ posted one
More Definitions of Pussy Grabs Back
Pussy Grabs Back ultimately illustrate successful examples of feminist rhetoric reclaiming the past, breaking its hold, and reaching towards gender equality, thus suggesting these waves are still in conversation and that contemporary feminist movements explicitly rely on their foremothers. Through the act of close reading, while also using digital tools for methodical data visualization, one can better understand the precise moves of language reclamation as a feminist rhetorical strategy. Comparing strategies of the Subversive Echo, found throughout feminist waves, provides rich material to analyze and better understand power dynamics around the female voice. Thank you to my committee members, without whom this thesis would not have been possible. Their patience, encouragement, and expertise were invaluable throughout my years at Emory. To my advisor, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, thank you for deftly directing my thoughts and guiding me through this process. Deliberately writing “Nevertheless, she persisted” on the board that day before class has meant more than you know and has stayed with me every day since. To ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, thank you for remaining as caring and supportive as when I first met you, just my second week on campus. From sitting in your class that first year in college to discussing ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ with you as a graduate student, I cannot imagine my academic career without you. To ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇