Proportionality definition
Proportionality means greater consideration be given to disability equality in relation to functions and policies that have the most effect on disabled people.
Proportionality means that control measures should be in proportion to the risk; e.g. if the risk assessment identifies negligible risks it is unreasonable to introduce an SPS measure that requires a stringent and costly regulatory regime.
Proportionality means, with respect to each Maturity of Bonds of any Series, that the Stated Amount of Related Residual Certificates of such Maturity and the Related Stated Amount of Floater Certificates of such Maturity are required to be proportional at all times such Certificates are Outstanding, subject to adjustment due to all applicable Authorized Denominations and rounding conventions. The Series Trust Agreement shall specify whether or not Proportionality is adopted for the related Series of Certificates and, if so, shall specify the Level of Proportionality for each Maturity of such Series.
Examples of Proportionality in a sentence
Proportionality and necessity are factors to be taken into consideration when deciding whether to share personal information.
Proportionality adjustments, if any, will apply to amounts withdrawn to make Customized Payments.
Proportionality has been identified as the key to Human Rights compliance.
Proportionality, data minimization, necessity and not being excessive are factors to be taken into consideration when deciding whether to share personal information.
Said another way, the Claimants shall only pursue such Non-Settling Parties listed on Exhibit F on a Proportionality basis, which is based upon ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇.
More Definitions of Proportionality
Proportionality as a means of assessing the trade impact of domestic regulations.137 In particular, the proposal suggests that, „[a] measure should be considered not more trade- restrictive/not more burdensome than necessary if it is not disproportionate to the objective[s] pursued.”138 There are concerns that such a test may imply a value judgment about the importance of the legitimate objective in question. The European proposal aims to address such concerns and explicitly states that, „[…] the validity or rationale, of the policy objective[s] must not be assessed”139.
Proportionality means something difference, which
Proportionality means the public health response is appropriate in light of the threat; in other words, there is a reasonable relationship between the burdens and the expected benefits. 141 Not all events of infectious disease requiring social distancing measures justify using quarantine, the most coercive and intrusive measure. On the other hand, shelter in place or other measures may be insufficiently aggressive. For example, during the early days of the Ebola epidemic in West Africa, some governments declared stay-at-home days for “reflection, education, and prayers” as a modest and noncoercive social
Proportionality the Fund will ensure that a procurement procedure bears a reasonable relationship to the nature and extent of the Contract. • Transparency: prior publication regarding procurement procedures shall be made in accordance with relevant national laws, and objective assessment criteria shall be determined and communicated to the can- didates beforehand for competitive negotiated or selective tendering procedures. Fund will always be transparent about both the procedure and the selection of the Candidate. Reasoning should be shared with re- jected Candidates if requested by that rejected Candidate. The Fund shall keep appropriate records with regard to the procurement procedures, its evaluation and award. Participation in a Procurement Procedure of the Fund shall in principle be open on equal terms to all natural and legal persons that meet the requirements of that specific Contract. Notwithstanding this, all Candidates are furthermore required to be in compliance with principles and standards of good practice consistent with applicable laws and in accordance with internationally accepted standards in order to participate in a Procurement Procedure of the Fund.
Proportionality means that offenders receive sentences that vary in direct relation to differences in the seriousness of their offenses and their blameworthiness. The guidelines themselves, particularly the ranking of offenses, are to a great extent premised on a principle of proportionality. The idea would be for judges to impose limits on their own departures by reference to goals of the guidelines and the principle of proportionality. For example, after deciding that a case was sufficiently aggravated to justify a departure, the judge would ask: Is it among the worst cases of its kind, requiring the imposition of the maximum sentence allowed by law or, if not, where does the offender fall in the range between the guideline sentence and the statutory maximum? The same analysis would apply to departures based on mitigating circumstances.
Proportionality means that the ESS standardisation process must be lean. It should be applied in such a way that the cost of application is reasonable compared to the possible standardisation results that are envisaged. All standardisation activities are pertinent, but the effort put into any activity has to be proportional to the expected benefits.” This principle also applies to IA: the burden of collecting the information needed must be kept within limits. On the other hand, the IA must generate all information needed for informed decision making. Focus groups could in principle be used for reducing the number of items on which data is collected. All items of the generic list would then still be considered, although not all would make it to the phase of actual data collection. However, as seen above, asking focus groups to make a selection of relevant items from the generic list may not yield the desired effect of keeping the burden acceptable. Another option is to collect less detailed information. In fact, the distinction between the initial collection of data of a more strategic nature and the later collection of more detailed and partly financial information would be in line with this.
Proportionality means that while retaining the objectives set out in Annexure I of this Directive, smaller or less complex insurers may be allowed to apply simplified solvency requirements. Capital requirements shall be appropriate to the nature, scale and complexity of the risks that insurers face and should be fair to all market players. Insurance Board may issue provisions regarding the application of the principle of proportionality.