{"component": "definition", "props": {"groups": [{"snippet": "means the greater weight of the evidence is more likely than not to have occurred.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "greater-weight-of-the-evidence", "type": "definition", "offset": [10, 40]}, {"key": "more-likely-than-not", "type": "definition", "offset": [44, 64]}], "samples": [{"hash": "iGKWfl6etHA", "uri": "https://www.myflfamilies.com/sites/default/files/2023-05/S17-001390_Signed%20Memo%20FSFN%20Functionality%20Enhancements%20and%20Updates%20to%20CFOP%20170-4,%20Child%20Maltreatment%20Index.pdf", "label": "www.myflfamilies.com", "score": 18.5167695775, "published": false}, {"hash": "qdPFHQEyIU", "uri": "https://www.myflfamilies.com/sites/default/files/2025-03/CFOP%20170-04%20Child%20Maltreatment%20Index.pdf", "label": "www.myflfamilies.com", "score": 15.4629383087, "published": false}, {"hash": "ibFfANXXwVZ", "uri": "https://www.myflfamilies.com/sites/default/files/2024-05/CFOP%20170-04%20Child%20Maltreatment%20Index.pdf", "label": "www.myflfamilies.com", "score": 9.2518825531, "published": false}], "size": 12, "hash": "d586b43ea305bb8efe50ca67f6b9953c", "id": 1}, {"snippet": "means a majority. Parks Reserve, 61 FLRA at 541. An individual who spends more than half of his or her employment time exercising supervisory authority that requires the exercise of independent judgment is a supervisor.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "a-majority", "type": "clause", "offset": [6, 16]}, {"key": "an-individual", "type": "clause", "offset": [49, 62]}, {"key": "supervisory-authority", "type": "definition", "offset": [130, 151]}, {"key": "exercise-of-independent-judgment", "type": "clause", "offset": [170, 202]}], "samples": [{"hash": "kpDBsM0poX0", "uri": "https://www.flra.gov/system/files?file=webfm/OGC/Rep%20Case%20Law%20Outline/REP%20Case%20Law%20Outline%20nov%202015.pdf", "label": "www.flra.gov", "score": 8.8034696579, "published": false}, {"hash": "h4hCGYjahAL", "uri": "https://www.flra.gov/system/files?file=webfm/OGC/Rep%20Case%20Law%20Outline/08.08.17%20Updated%20Rep%20Case%20Law%20Outline%20(nov%202015).pdf", "label": "www.flra.gov", "score": 8.2126684189, "published": false}, {"hash": "jdZrF3p2Ca2", "uri": "http://www.flra.gov/system/files?file=webfm/OGC/Rep%20Case%20Law%20Outline/REP%20Case%20Law%20Outline%20march%202013.pdf", "label": "www.flra.gov", "score": 6.5707421303, "published": false}], "size": 4, "hash": "436461768073b14574fbc10bd3530d5d", "id": 2}, {"snippet": "means the standard is met if the proposition is more likely to be true than not true. The standard is satisfied if there is greater than 50 percent chance that the allegation is true.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-standard", "type": "clause", "offset": [6, 18]}, {"key": "the-allegation", "type": "clause", "offset": [160, 174]}], "samples": [{"hash": "g2wmsZ4bqXw", "uri": "https://hhs.iowa.gov/sites/default/files/3-C-4.pdf", "label": "hhs.iowa.gov", "score": 11.094455719, "published": false}, {"hash": "6aoh39hrpgy", "uri": "https://hhs.iowa.gov/sites/default/files/3-C.pdf", "label": "hhs.iowa.gov", "score": 9.094455719, "published": false}, {"hash": "kHMhnuJm6kP", "uri": "https://dhs.iowa.gov/sites/default/files/3-C.pdf?011120211827", "label": "dhs.iowa.gov", "score": 8.3744010925, "published": false}], "size": 3, "hash": "85d30f06f6674dd0a2a5d01e6caa41de", "id": 3}, {"snippet": "means proof by information that, compared with that opposing it, leads to the conclusion that the fact at issue is more probably true than not. FAR 9.403. See Imco, Inc. v. United States, 33 Fed. Cl. 312 (1995).", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-fact", "type": "clause", "offset": [94, 102]}, {"key": "united-states", "type": "definition", "offset": [173, 186]}], "samples": [{"hash": "jQkdC6mvWeF", "uri": "https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/CAD_2021_Ch28.pdf", "label": "www.loc.gov", "score": 5.7440109253, "published": false}, {"hash": "egq3WxpV2yQ", "uri": "https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/CAD_2014_Ch28.pdf", "label": "www.loc.gov", "score": 2.2600958347, "published": false}], "size": 2, "hash": "2e7be097c62f3a211a14c665fe677997", "id": 4}, {"snippet": "of the evidence essentially means it is more likely an incident happened than not; there is greater than a 50% chance that the claim is true. \u201cClear and convincing\u201d requires the evidence to prove the claim is substantially more true than untrue. \u201cPreponderance\u201d of evidence is the burden of proof used in most civil trials.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-evidence", "type": "clause", "offset": [3, 15]}, {"key": "the-claim", "type": "definition", "offset": [123, 132]}, {"key": "clear-and-convincing", "type": "definition", "offset": [143, 163]}, {"key": "burden-of-proof", "type": "clause", "offset": [281, 296]}], "samples": [{"hash": "80jnBPAkNeN", "uri": "https://stockton.edu/student-development/student-senate/January292019.docx", "label": "Notice", "score": 9.5475702286, "published": false}], "size": 1, "hash": "e2c19438f20372832fdc3d6b52516574", "id": 5}, {"snippet": "of the Holders\" . . . . . . . . . . . 8 \"Property\" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 \"Register\" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 \"Registered Holder of Notes\" or \"Registered Holder\" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 \"Responsible Officer\" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-holders", "type": "clause", "offset": [3, 14]}, {"key": "holder-of-notes", "type": "clause", "offset": [162, 177]}, {"key": "responsible-officer", "type": "clause", "offset": [235, 254]}], "samples": [{"hash": "1EQtJyGpl2N", "uri": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/56824/000095012495003799/16.txt", "label": "Kmart Corp", "score": 5.0, "published": false}], "size": 1, "hash": "332420bd548188bd16320fbb41a90be9", "id": 6}, {"snippet": "means a simple majority or more than 50%.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "simple-majority", "type": "clause", "offset": [8, 23]}], "samples": [{"hash": "fo5G80Tyq5g", "uri": "https://www.cityofgolden.net/media/SiteDevelopmentRegulations.pdf", "label": "www.cityofgolden.net", "score": 5.8254618645, "published": false}], "size": 1, "hash": "3eb383207d2ff5ea2f70fe099fb54da6", "id": 7}, {"snippet": "means more than half. If, for example, the hearing panel concludes that the evidence \u2014 considered overall \u2014 weighs equally on both sides, the preponderance standard has not been met and the charges have not been proven.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "for-example", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 37]}, {"key": "hearing-panel", "type": "definition", "offset": [43, 56]}, {"key": "the-evidence", "type": "clause", "offset": [72, 84]}, {"key": "both-sides", "type": "definition", "offset": [126, 136]}, {"key": "the-charges", "type": "clause", "offset": [186, 197]}], "samples": [{"hash": "gODqGGyfGGf", "uri": "https://www.carlalbert.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/nacua-Due-Process-questions_review.pdf", "label": "www.carlalbert.edu", "score": 4.0787134171, "published": false}], "size": 1, "hash": "4d35abbbbe7f81ab7969e23611f57385", "id": 8}, {"snippet": "means greater weight of the evidence. It means that all of the evidence, regardless of which party may have produced it, must lead the Panel to believe that the fact at issue is more likely true than not true. Greater weight of the evidence does not necessarily mean the greater number of witnesses or the greater volume of evidence. Any believable evidence may be enough to prove that a disputed fact is more likely true than not.[6]", "snippet_links": [{"key": "greater-weight-of-the-evidence", "type": "definition", "offset": [6, 36]}, {"key": "the-panel", "type": "clause", "offset": [131, 140]}, {"key": "the-fact", "type": "clause", "offset": [157, 165]}, {"key": "number-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [279, 288]}], "samples": [{"hash": "hsIFn6vG8Ug", "uri": "https://mn.gov/oah/assets/211112468.rt2_tcm19-159729.pdf", "label": "mn.gov", "score": 6.1704311371, "published": false}], "size": 1, "hash": "d18c8d2660b628954a3c1529f95cedfe", "id": 9}, {"snippet": "of the evidence. This means that more than 50% of the evidence needs to support the disciplinary action for the adverse action to be upheld. Now, if an adverse action is taken under \u00a7714, VA can sustain adverse actions with only \u201csubstantial\u201d evidence. This means that VA only needs to support its disciplinary action with around 30%-40% of the evidence weighing in favor of the penalty for discipline.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-evidence", "type": "clause", "offset": [3, 15]}, {"key": "disciplinary-action", "type": "definition", "offset": [84, 103]}, {"key": "adverse-actions", "type": "clause", "offset": [203, 218]}, {"key": "va-only", "type": "definition", "offset": [269, 276]}, {"key": "in-favor-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [363, 374]}], "samples": [{"hash": "lgjj4yMIiye", "uri": "https://actionnetwork.org/user_files/user_files/000/017/026/original/VA_Guidance_8-1-17.pdf?link_id=0&can_id=54e8dc82a6b9242ade3666b588c7a750&source=email-more-members-to-have-your-back-organize-in-va-2-2&email_referrer=more-members-to-have-your-back-organize-in-va-2-2&email_subject=updated-va-accountability-whistleblower-protection-act-guidance", "label": "actionnetwork.org", "score": 6.7905545235, "published": false}], "size": 1, "hash": "8688cac9d789977a70b71f32a02b131b", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "CloSVGoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjYLEhpEZWZpbml0aW9uU25pcHBldEdyb3VwX3Y1NiIWcHJlcG9uZGVyYW5jZSMwMDAwMDAwYQyiAQJlbhgAIAA=", "definition": {"title": "Preponderance", "snippet": "means the greater weight of the evidence is more likely than not to have occurred.", "size": 28, "id": "preponderance", "examples": ["<strong>Preponderance</strong> of the evidence may not be determined by the number of witnesses, but by the greater weight of all evidence.", "The Chancellor&#x27;s Office appeal response will include a summary of the issues raised on appeal, a summary of the evidence considered, the <strong>Preponderance</strong> of the Evidence standard, and the determination(s) reached regarding the issue(s) identified within the written appeal.", "The <strong>Preponderance</strong> of Similarities with Other Regions, in The Law of the Sea and Polar Maritime Delimitation and Jurisdiction 179 (A.", "<strong>Preponderance</strong> of combined transport systems with a greater role for public transport and cycling.", "The standard of proof the hearing officer will use is whether each allegation is substantiated by a <strong>Preponderance</strong> of the Evidence.", "<strong>Preponderance</strong> of evidence means the trend in ratings over the course of the evaluation period.", "<strong>Preponderance</strong> of the evidence is defined as evidence which is of greater weight or more convincing than the evidence which is offered in opposition to it; that is, evidence which as a whole shows that the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.", "The <strong>Preponderance</strong> of the Evidence based on the facts available at the time of the decision is the standard for demonstrating facts and reaching conclusions in an investigation that uses these procedures.", "Notice of the investigation outcome shall include a summary of the allegations, the investigative process, the <strong>Preponderance</strong> of the Evidence standard, the evidence considered, the findings of fact, a determination as to whether the University\u2019s Nondiscrimination Policy was violated, and if so, any Remedies to be afforded to the Complainant.", "On the effect of the Korean War upon U.S. European policy, see \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, A <strong>Preponderance</strong> of Power, pp."], "related": [["preponderance-of-the-evidence", "Preponderance of the evidence", "<strong>Preponderance</strong> of the evidence"], ["preponderance-of-evidence", "Preponderance of evidence", "<strong>Preponderance</strong> of evidence"], ["proven", "Proven", "Proven"], ["burden", "Burden", "Burden"], ["upheld", "upheld", "upheld"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-10T05:58:13+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}