Examples of Policy Violation in a sentence
CONFIDENTIALITY OF COMPLAINTS AND REPORTSParties in these processes, including the Complainant, the individual accused of a Policy Violation (“Respondent”), and witnesses, have privacy rights and reasonable expectations of confidentiality in the investigation of matters subject to this procedure.
Accordingly, except as specifically provided otherwise in this Anti- Doping Policy, it is not necessary that intent, Fault, negligence or knowing Use on the Athlete’s part be demonstrated in order to establish an Anti- Doping Policy Violation for Use of a Prohibited Substance or a Prohibited Method (subject to the other express provisions of this Anti-Doping Policy that do incorporate concepts of intent, knowledge, Fault, Negligence and other standards).
Any individual with a good faith belief that an Affiliated Individual has violated this policy may notify the NWBA Ethics Committee by submitting a Policy Violation Report online: https://www.nwba.org/applications or by calling the NWBA National Office: (719) 266-4082.
Potential Consequences Following a Finding of a Policy Violation 1.
In cases where the Complaint investigation results in a finding that an alleged Policy Violation(s) and/or retaliation is substantiated, in addition to stopping the Policy Violation and/or retaliation, the Intervention Coordinator must take action to remedy the effects.
USADA shall have the burden of establishing that an Anti-Doping Policy Violation has occurred.
The basis for expulsion from the university for violating the Academic Integrity Policy is the existence of the Academic Policy Violation Act and the minutes of the Ethics Council meeting with the corresponding decision.
Specifically, the Board will not engage in or tolerate discrimination/retaliation, including: coercion, harassment, intimidation, or threatening or interfering with any individual who questions, makes a charge, testifies, assists, participates in, or declines to participate in the application of this Complaint Procedure to a Policy Violation as defined in Paragraph 2-P.
Accordingly, it is not necessary that intent, Fault, negligence or knowing Use on the Athlete’s part be demonstrated in order to establish an Anti-Doping Policy Violation under Article 2.1 (subject to the other express provisions of this Anti-Doping Policy that do incorporate concepts of intent, knowledge, Fault, No Fault or Negligence or other evidentiary standards).
The standard of proof shall be whether USADA has established an Anti- Doping Policy Violation with Clear and Convincing evidence.