{"component": "definition", "props": {"groups": [{"snippet_links": [{"key": "based-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [54, 62]}, {"key": "the-information", "type": "clause", "offset": [63, 78]}, {"key": "the-independent", "type": "clause", "offset": [91, 106]}, {"key": "negative-assurance", "type": "clause", "offset": [176, 194]}, {"key": "an-opinion", "type": "clause", "offset": [249, 259]}, {"key": "for-example", "type": "clause", "offset": [268, 279]}, {"key": "reserves-information", "type": "definition", "offset": [335, 355]}, {"key": "in-accordance-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [392, 410]}, {"key": "principles-and-definitions", "type": "clause", "offset": [411, 437]}, {"key": "the-evaluation", "type": "clause", "offset": [511, 525]}, {"key": "oil-and-gas-reserves", "type": "clause", "offset": [529, 549]}, {"key": "public-disclosure", "type": "clause", "offset": [554, 571]}], "size": 7, "samples": [{"hash": "2outIJKSuLG", "uri": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090012/000095012311018537/d78726exv99w2.htm", "label": "Devon Energy Corp/De", "score": 4.1498973306, "published": false}, {"hash": "hcX31JpsIff", "uri": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090012/000095012310078807/d75451exv99w3.htm", "label": "Devon Energy Corp/De", "score": 3.6269678303, "published": false}, {"hash": "kcu5SretEqZ", "uri": "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090012/000095012310017093/d71091exv99w3.htm", "label": "Devon Energy Corp/De", "score": 3.1505817933, "published": false}], "snippet": "means the reserves data appear to be worthy of belief based on the information obtained by the independent qualified reserves auditor in carrying out the aforementioned steps. Negative assurance can be given by the independent reserves auditor, but an opinion cannot. For example, \u201cNothing came to my attention that would indicate the reserves information has not been prepared and presented in accordance with principles and definitions adopted by the SPEE (Calgary Chapter), and APEGGA (Practice Standard for the Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves for Public Disclosure).", "hash": "8196d5e875eb17bbbbbd201c95e303e3", "id": 1}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "the-statement", "type": "clause", "offset": [61, 74]}, {"key": "human-genome", "type": "definition", "offset": [84, 96]}, {"key": "eli-lilly", "type": "definition", "offset": [112, 121]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [185, 193]}], "size": 3, "samples": [{"hash": "bRP0d6361GN", "uri": "http://eplaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/UK-GSK-v-Wyeth.doc", "label": "eplaw.org", "score": 8.8959616701, "published": false}, {"hash": "dxvhVBEokqD", "uri": "https://t1.daumcdn.net/cfile/tistory/215C10415742B8302E?download", "label": "t1.daumcdn.net", "score": 6.1937029432, "published": false}, {"hash": "c4UuC2SMnGA", "uri": "https://www.laipla.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/BexseroPDFversion.pdf", "label": "www.laipla.net", "score": 6.1800136893, "published": false}], "snippet": "means that there must be some real reason for supposing that the statement is true; Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly & Co [2012] RPC 6 at [149]. This excludes speculative patents, based on mere assertion.", "hash": "3cbbcc50309d28d199826a6177685bdb", "id": 2}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "the-model", "type": "clause", "offset": [45, 54]}, {"key": "the-human", "type": "clause", "offset": [172, 181]}, {"key": "the-action", "type": "clause", "offset": [245, 255]}, {"key": "change-in", "type": "definition", "offset": [537, 546]}], "size": 3, "samples": [{"hash": "gq6jpOvm7Tb", "uri": "https://core.ac.uk/download/217243029.pdf", "label": "core.ac.uk", "score": 6.2881587953, "published": false}, {"hash": "cM2MGPGvZ98", "uri": "https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=tls_doctoral", "label": "digitalcommons.du.edu", "score": 6.1704312115, "published": false}, {"hash": "ic53AC93g6Q", "uri": "https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d826/0afd2b840d4002ef13efc6417e7e4f4cfa45.pdf", "label": "pdfs.semanticscholar.org", "score": 5.2600958248, "published": false}], "snippet": "means that stakeholders believe the logic of the model is correct: if we do these things, we will get the results we want and expect (Connell & Klem, 2000). \u201cDoable\u201d means the human, political, and economic resources are sufficient to implement the action strategies in the theory (Connell & Klem, 2000). \u201cTestable\u201d means that stakeholders believe there are credible ways to discover whether the results are as predicted (Connell & Klem, 2000). \u201cMeaningful\u201d means that stakeholders see the outcomes as important and see the magnitude of change in these outcomes being pursued as worth the effort (Connell & Klem, 2000).", "hash": "e0d006a40a51f002158b311a24e8d64f", "id": 3}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "finance-ltd", "type": "clause", "offset": [271, 282]}, {"key": "december-1999", "type": "clause", "offset": [311, 324]}], "size": 3, "samples": [{"hash": "g83OrFW4hwW", "uri": "https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2023/1150.pdf", "label": "www.saflii.org", "score": 15.3335856119, "published": false}, {"hash": "3cWqjgfOUGg", "uri": "https://lawlibrary.org.za/akn/za-gp/judgment/zagpphc/2023/1047/eng@2023-09-11/source", "label": "lawlibrary.org.za", "score": 9.855578371, "published": false}], "snippet": "in this context means \u2018acceptable, credible or suitable\u2019: See Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Koch 1963 (4) SA 147 (A) at 159B-D. Also see generally AA Onderlinge Assuransie-Assosiasie Bpk v De Beer 1982 (2) SA 603 (A); Cooper and Another v Merchant Trade Finance Ltd (474/97) [1999] ZASCA 97 (1 December 1999) at para 7; Govan v Skidmore 1952 (1) SA 732 (N) at 734C-E.", "hash": "88de4a3cf3798c5f29f4854a1a425acd", "id": 4}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "account-number", "type": "clause", "offset": [9, 23]}, {"key": "the-account", "type": "clause", "offset": [132, 143]}, {"key": "number-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [186, 195]}], "size": 3, "samples": [{"hash": "8fzGFrWuQZ0", "uri": "https://www.swift.com/sites/default/files/documents/swift_standards_slma_priorityservicelevelrulesandregulations.pdf", "label": "www.swift.com", "score": 2.0, "published": false}], "snippet": "means an account number, the structure of which (format \u2013 check digit) appears to be valid (provided, that this does not imply that the account number exists, nor that it is the account number of the stated Beneficiary).", "hash": "74f3b2f95866cafd6c7614f8d5aeda9f", "id": 5}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "new-world", "type": "definition", "offset": [34, 43]}, {"key": "english-language", "type": "definition", "offset": [260, 276]}], "size": 2, "samples": [{"hash": "24E71nuX4T4", "uri": "https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/revpub/B160462.PDF", "label": "www.courts.ca.gov", "score": 5.8145106092, "published": false}, {"hash": "6hzRLFelX29", "uri": "https://cases.justia.com/california/court-of-appeal/b160462.pdf?ts=1396114003", "label": "cases.justia.com", "score": 1.0, "published": false}], "snippet": "means \u201cseemingly true\u201d (Webster\u2019s New World Dict. (2nd college ed. 1978) p. 1091), having an appearance of truth or reason; seemingly worthy of approval or acceptance; credible; believable: a plausible excuse; a plausible plot.\u201d (The Random House Dict. of the English Language (2d ed. unabridged 1987, p. 1484). It denotes a", "hash": "26a98386b9c2840b3700ea23399df15c", "id": 6}, {"snippet_links": [], "size": 1, "samples": [{"hash": "cB0YgTWfnDy", "uri": "https://www.eu-hub.eu/sites/default/files/2019-11/The%20interaction%20between%20the%20Charter%20of%20Fundamental%20Rights,%20the%20European%20Convention%20of%20Human%20Rights%20and%20National%20Constitutions_1.doc", "label": "www.eu-hub.eu", "score": 17.6821987141, "published": false}], "snippet": "that the test is met215; this means that the Strasbourg Court can defer largely to the", "hash": "70680361f3761558e9757592f6f3295e", "id": 7}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "laws-and-decrees", "type": "clause", "offset": [106, 122]}, {"key": "written-document", "type": "definition", "offset": [153, 169]}, {"key": "the-contracting-parties", "type": "clause", "offset": [246, 269]}, {"key": "mutual-obligations", "type": "clause", "offset": [271, 289]}], "size": 1, "samples": [{"hash": "ka82ZIiWIXL", "uri": "https://www.austriaca.at/0xc1aa5576%200x0031f1bd.pdf", "label": "www.austriaca.at", "score": 8.5653661875, "published": false}], "snippet": "the alternative explanation that the \u201cstandard provision\u201d is not really an effort to assert priority over laws and decrees, but is merely \u201cdeclaring the written document to be the most valid instrument of proof \u2026 the most authentic embodiment of the contracting parties\u2019 mutual obligations\u201d (ibid.).", "hash": "561ef4491797398f01de605e5e20853a", "id": 8}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "golf-course", "type": "definition", "offset": [67, 78]}], "size": 1, "samples": [{"hash": "cssDAtdbqMm", "uri": "https://www.kaipara.govt.nz/uploads/districtplan_operative/planchanges/PPC84%20Mangawhai%20Hills/Clive%20Boonham%20-%20PPC84%20Oral%20Statement.pdf", "label": "www.kaipara.govt.nz", "score": 17.1179018107, "published": false}], "snippet": "means nothing. Council is only committed to stages 1 and 2. If the golf course solution does not materialise there may be no alternative.", "hash": "b67c29054f9777f10dee1212608150e9", "id": 9}, {"snippet_links": [{"key": "new-world", "type": "definition", "offset": [34, 43]}, {"key": "english-language", "type": "definition", "offset": [260, 276]}, {"key": "reasonable-probability", "type": "definition", "offset": [335, 357]}, {"key": "does-not-meet", "type": "definition", "offset": [450, 463]}], "size": 1, "samples": [{"hash": "dVAek68Icr", "uri": "http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/revpub/B160462.DOC", "label": "www.courts.ca.gov", "score": 8.1704312115, "published": false}], "snippet": "means \u201cseemingly true\u201d (Webster\u2019s New World Dict. (2nd college ed. 1978) p. 1091), having an appearance of truth or reason; seemingly worthy of approval or acceptance; credible; believable: a plausible excuse; a plausible plot.\u201d (The Random House Dict. of the English Language (2d ed. unabridged 1987, p. 1484). It denotes a degree of reasonable probability, a degree of apparent credibility greater than mere possibility. Warrick\u2019s factual scenario does not meet that standard.", "hash": "ccb6ba888da06cf37ed6f2ced86aba28", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClYSUGoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjILEhpEZWZpbml0aW9uU25pcHBldEdyb3VwX3Y1NiIScGxhdXNpYmxlIzAwMDAwMDBhDKIBAmVuGAAgAA==", "definition": {"size": 30, "title": "Plausible", "snippet": "means the reserves data appear to be worthy of belief based on the information obtained by the independent qualified reserves auditor in carrying out the aforementioned steps. Negative assurance can be given by the independent reserves auditor, but an opinion cannot. For example, \u201cNothing came to my attention that would indicate the reserves information has not been prepared and presented in accordance with principles and definitions adopted by the SPEE (Calgary Chapter), and APEGGA (Practice Standard for the Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves for Public Disclosure).", "id": "plausible", "examples": ["The Claims Administrator\u2019s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the Claim is Complete and <strong>Plausible</strong>.", "If, after review of the Claim and all documentation submitted by the Claimant, the Claims Administrator determines that such a Claim is Complete and <strong>Plausible</strong>, then the Claim shall be paid.", "If the Parties agree that the Claimant\u2019s Claim is Complete and <strong>Plausible</strong>, then the Claim shall be paid.", "If the Parties agree that the Claimant\u2019s Claim is Complete and <strong>Plausible</strong> then the Claim shall be paid.", "<strong>Plausible</strong> mechanisms of how AHR can inhibit PB-dependent activation of CYP2B via CAR are summarized within Figure 5 (a) If AHR agonists could increase intracellular cAMP levels, this would decrease the PB-mediated induction of CYP2B (Sidhu &amp; Omiecinski, 1995).", "If the Claim is not Complete and <strong>Plausible</strong> because the Claimant has not provided all information needed to complete the claim form and evaluate the Claim, then the Settlement Administrator may reject the Claim.", "<strong>Plausible</strong> grounds for the request exist where the competent authority of the United Kingdom has identified on a case-by-case basis a tax risk in relation to the United Kingdom taxpayer and sees <strong>plausible</strong>, non-arbitrary grounds for checking the tax position of a United Kingdom taxpayer.", "Upon receipt of an incomplete or unsigned claim form or a claim form that is not accompanied by sufficient documentation to determine whether the Claim is Complete and <strong>Plausible</strong>, the Claims Administrator shall request Claim Supplementation and give the Claimant thirty (30) days to cure the defect before rejecting the Claim.", "The Claims Administrator will authorize the payment of the claim if it believes the Claim is Complete and <strong>Plausible</strong>.", "In relation to NANoREG and D6.1, the goal is to look at Probable futures, with a hint of <strong>Plausible</strong> futures."], "related": [["tolerance", "Tolerance", "Tolerance"], ["intensity", "Intensity", "Intensity"], ["preponderance-of-the-evidence", "Preponderance of the evidence", "Preponderance of the evidence"], ["cultural", "Cultural", "Cultural"], ["cannabinoid-edible", "Cannabinoid edible", "Cannabinoid edible"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-06T21:56:50+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}