Palpable definition

Palpable means an error that is obvious. Many things can qualify as “palpable.” Examples include obvious illogic in the reasons (such as factual findings that cannot sit together), findings made without any admissible evidence or evidence received in accordance with the doctrine of judicial notice, findings based on improper inferences or logical error, and the failure to make findings due to a complete or near-complete disregard of evidence.
Palpable means obvious. “Overriding” means dispositive; a mistake so serious as to have likely influenced the outcome. In appeals from a trial judge’s exercise of discretion, deference is owed. We will only intervene if we are satisfied that in the exercise of that discretion the judge erred in law or the outcome is patently unjust. Unless an appellant can persuade us that the trial judge either erred in law, or erred in fact, or erred in the exercise of discretion in the ways I have just described, the appeal will fail. See generally, Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at ¶8 ff.; Gwynne-Timothy v. McPhee, 2005 NSCA 80 at ¶31-34; Laushway v.
Palpable means “obvious”, and “overriding” means “going to the very core of the outcome”: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇. ▇. ▇., ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ 165, 4 B.L.R. (5th) 31 at para. 46; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ v. St-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2016 SCC 48, [2016] 2 S.C.R. 352 at para. 38. Therefore, for this Court to intervene on the issue of utility, Apotex must convince us that the Federal Court has made an obvious error that goes to the very core of the outcome. [45] I recognize that the Federal Court’s explanation for its conclusion is short on detail. I understand that the Federal Court was satisfied that the 004 Study showed the utility of the combination of AA and PN as a treatment for CRPC, though without any comparison to show that the combination is better than either drug alone. I also understand that the Federal Court was satisfied that the 001 Study provided a comparison of AA alone with a combination that, though different from the patented combination, is similar (in that both PN and dexamethasone are glucocorticoids). This seems to have satisfied the Federal Court as regards a comparison of the claimed combination to AA alone. The Federal Court also concluded at paragraph 115 of the Reasons that the 001 Study showed that AA was an effective cancer treatment on its own. This is relevant to the requirement, according to the Federal Court’s claim construction, that each of the drugs in the combination attack the cancer in a meaningful way. Finally, the Federal Court’s

Examples of Palpable in a sentence

  • The Company reserves the right to either void from the outset or amend the terms of a Transaction it deems to be affected by Palpable Error, without your consent.

  • All determinations and calculations made by the Company under this Client Agreement will be binding on you unless affected by Palpable Error.

  • The Company will determine a Palpable Error by taking into account any relevant information including, without limitation, the state of the Underlying Market prices at the time of the error or any error in, or lack of clarity of, any information source or pronouncement upon which the Company bases its quoted prices.

  • The Company will not rely on any transaction you have entered into with the Company when deciding whether or not there has been a Palpable Error.

  • Palpable inguinal lymph nodes were the only local reaction to vaccination observed in study animals.

  • Palpable indurations of 5mm or more indicate a positive reaction.

  • Palpable induration around the tuberculin injection site 48–72 hours after TST administration is considered evidence of infection: a previous exposure to M.


More Definitions of Palpable

Palpable means an error that is obvious. “Overriding” means an error that goes to the very core of the outcome of the case. When arguing palpable and overriding error, it is not enough to pull at leaves and branches and leave the tree standing. The entire tree must fall.