Examples of original Act in a sentence
Details about the original Act and legislation that has amended its text are shown in the Compilation table in endnote 1, at the back of the reprint.
Although the original Act required its application in any construction contract over $2,000 or non-construction contract to which the Act applied over $2,500 (and language to that effect is still found in 49 CFR 18.36(i)(6)), the Act no longer applies to any “contract in an amount that is not greater than $100,000.” 40 USC 3701(b)(3)(A)(iii).
Although the original Act required its application in any construction contract over $2,000 or non-construction contract to which the Act applied over $2,500 (and language to that effect is still found in 49 CFR 18.36(i)(6)), the Act no longer applies to any “contract in an amount that is not greater than $100,000.” 40 USC 3701(b)(3) (A)(iii).
Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 (1965).) Some of the interpretations in this part relating to the application of the Act are interpretations of provisions which appeared in the original Act be- fore its amendments in 1972 and 1976.
DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITYThis is the unofficial translation of the original Act in Dhivehi.
Details about the original Act are shown in the Compilation table in endnote 1, at the back of the reprint.
A reference to an Act of Parliament, whether State or Federal, includes a reference to that Act of Parliament as amended from time to time, and a reference to a specific provision of an Act of Parliament means, unless the context demands otherwise, a reference to the equivalent provision in any later amended version of that Act of Parliament, or if the original Act of Parliament has been repealed in any Act of Parliament substituted in its place.
Although the original Act required its application in any construction contract over$2,000 or non-construction contract to which the Act applied over $2,500 (and language to that effect is still found in 49 CFR 18.36(i)(6)), the Act no longer applies to any “contract in an amount that is not greater than $100,000.” 40 USC 3701(b)(3) (A)(iii).
In March 2007, Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen introduced H.R. 1856, the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act Amendments of 2007, which would amend the original Act to further restrict contact with and assistance to the PA.
It was doubtless out of an awareness of the need for such flexibility that Congress included in the original Act, and has since retained, a clause expressly reserving to it “[t]he right to alter, amend, or repeal any provision” of the act.