{"component": "definition", "props": {"groups": [{"snippet": "means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.\").", "samples": [{"hash": "ekjfbXPG3tI", "uri": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca1-12-02387/pdf/USCOURTS-ca1-12-02387-0.pdf", "label": "www.govinfo.gov", "score": 5.6132785763, "published": false}, {"hash": "9G5Tw0kizBM", "uri": "https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/12-2387/12-2387-2015-03-25.pdf?ts=1427317206", "label": "cases.justia.com", "score": 5.6132785763, "published": false}, {"hash": "c8438KPHTVt", "uri": "https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/12-2387/106815270/0.pdf", "label": "cases.justia.com", "score": 5.6132785763, "published": false}], "size": 4, "snippet_links": [{"key": "as-amended", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 36]}], "hash": "a35edb4878ba9a52497ed77f38c9f19e", "id": 1}, {"snippet": "means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.\u201d Glassman v. Computervision Corp., 90 F.3d 617, 623 (1st Cir. 1996). \u201cIn assessing futility, the district court must apply the standard", "samples": [{"hash": "280Mwm4nuw8", "uri": "https://www.hortyspringer.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Thurlow_v_YorkHospital_January2017.pdf", "label": "www.hortyspringer.com", "score": 9.9850209598, "published": false}, {"hash": "5sGQl2r9dm6", "uri": "https://ecf.med.uscourts.gov/docpub/09101984735", "label": "ecf.med.uscourts.gov", "score": 8.1704312115, "published": false}, {"hash": "abfd1BztSWA", "uri": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-med-2_16-cv-00179/pdf/USCOURTS-med-2_16-cv-00179-1.pdf", "label": "www.govinfo.gov", "score": 6.5126625599, "published": false}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "as-amended", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 36]}, {"key": "district-court", "type": "definition", "offset": [199, 213]}, {"key": "the-standard", "type": "clause", "offset": [225, 237]}], "hash": "ac360b05629f08f5f490f059e3b3bf0e", "id": 2}, {"snippet": "means care offered that would not mitigate a patient\u2019s lethal diagnosis or prognosis of imminent death.", "samples": [{"hash": "38wsbwxdzAu", "uri": "http://legislature.mi.gov/publications/jcar/JCAR%20Files/Rule%20Documents%20by%20Department%20and%20Rule%20Number/Department%20of%20Licensing%20and%20Regulatory%20Affairs/2018-031%20LR/2018-031%20LR%20Midwifery%20Public%20Hearing%20(10.30.18)%20Board%20Comments%203.27.pdf", "label": "legislature.mi.gov", "score": 10.8165639973, "published": false}, {"hash": "61qKJMBUWUl", "uri": "https://www.michigan.gov/-/media/Project/Websites/lara/bpl/Folder29/11-30-18_Midwifery_Full_Approved_with_Attachments.pdf?rev=b22bab3f779a4db4b0913cbe73e77f17", "label": "www.michigan.gov", "score": 9.5886379192, "published": false}, {"hash": "3kD8JP7BThe", "uri": "https://boardsandcommissions.sd.gov/bcuploads/05-24-18_cpm_meeting_packet.pdf", "label": "boardsandcommissions.sd.gov", "score": 9.1861738535, "published": false}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "imminent-death", "type": "clause", "offset": [88, 102]}], "hash": "39e5304e6c3bdfcadcd330a8c13fd1ba", "id": 3}, {"snippet": "means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. See In re NAHC, Inc. Sec. Litig., 306 F.3d 1314, 1332 (3d Cir. 2002);", "samples": [{"hash": "7uCodomiH1h", "uri": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-pamd-1_12-cv-00993/pdf/USCOURTS-pamd-1_12-cv-00993-9.pdf", "label": "www.govinfo.gov", "score": 13.0333565918, "published": false}, {"hash": "kmCsF7Nnkzy", "uri": "https://chimicles.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Orrstown-Motion-for-Leave-to-File-TAC-Opinion.pdf", "label": "chimicles.com", "score": 8.06091718, "published": false}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "as-amended", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 36]}], "hash": "3209ced769e30b50d5999153e67d5490", "id": 4}, {"snippet": "in this context, means that the proposed amended complaint \u201cwould not withstand a motion to dismiss.\u201d Massarsky v. Gen. Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111, 125 (3d Cir. 1983); see also Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d", "samples": [{"hash": "57wdi1XSH9G", "uri": "http://business.cch.com/ald/IndiviorIncvDrReddysLaboratoriesSA8252020.pdf", "label": "business.cch.com", "score": 8.3223819302, "published": false}, {"hash": "d4si1jFMOl0", "uri": "https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/new-jersey/njdce/2:2017cv07106/354482/320/0.pdf", "label": "cases.justia.com", "score": 6.3223819302, "published": false}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-proposed", "type": "clause", "offset": [28, 40]}, {"key": "amended-complaint", "type": "definition", "offset": [41, 58]}, {"key": "motion-to-dismiss", "type": "definition", "offset": [82, 99]}, {"key": "philip-morris", "type": "definition", "offset": [186, 199]}], "hash": "ed3f589210a8eb04eb006df0a9ef64bd", "id": 5}, {"snippet": "means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig., 114 F.3d 1410, 1434 (3d Cir. 1997). In determining \u201cfutility,\u201d the district court applies the same standard of legal sufficiency as applies under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Id. Therefore, before allowing Wheelings to amend her complaint to add punitive damages, the court must find that punitive damages are available for her claims.", "samples": [{"hash": "3WSwBD3viZR", "uri": "https://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/07D0669P.pdf", "label": "www.paed.uscourts.gov", "score": 8.3552361396, "published": false}, {"hash": "7HJdKwiu4hV", "uri": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-paed-2_06-cv-01585/pdf/USCOURTS-paed-2_06-cv-01585-0.pdf", "label": "www.govinfo.gov", "score": 3.0, "published": false}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "as-amended", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 36]}, {"key": "district-court", "type": "definition", "offset": [212, 226]}, {"key": "legal-sufficiency", "type": "definition", "offset": [256, 273]}, {"key": "to-amend", "type": "definition", "offset": [358, 366]}, {"key": "punitive-damages", "type": "definition", "offset": [388, 404]}, {"key": "the-court", "type": "clause", "offset": [406, 415]}], "hash": "6a0f81820b9d8a5456623b8c3f78b08f", "id": 6}, {"snippet": "means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which", "samples": [{"hash": "ejC27qqCiQI", "uri": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-njd-2_09-cv-06356/pdf/USCOURTS-njd-2_09-cv-06356-0.pdf", "label": "www.govinfo.gov", "score": 3.379192334, "published": false}, {"hash": "34iOuqyi5xE", "uri": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-njd-2_06-cv-01278/pdf/USCOURTS-njd-2_06-cv-01278-4.pdf", "label": "www.govinfo.gov", "score": 3.0, "published": false}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "as-amended", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 36]}], "hash": "df868d4aeefcc1f8ef30cbc85bab4a82", "id": 7}, {"snippet": "means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.\u201d In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig., 114 F.3d 1410, 1434 (3d Cir.", "samples": [{"hash": "igZtFrkNgGW", "uri": "https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/5:2012cv03363/464036/49/0.pdf", "label": "cases.justia.com", "score": 2.8754277892, "published": false}, {"hash": "kKpi1eVFVLK", "uri": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-paed-5_12-cv-03363/pdf/USCOURTS-paed-5_12-cv-03363-2.pdf", "label": "www.govinfo.gov", "score": 2.8685831622, "published": false}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "as-amended", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 36]}], "hash": "c442b50acd1318148542b7a200128c15", "id": 8}, {"snippet": "means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.\u201d Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc., 594 F.3d 238, 243 (3d Cir. 2010) (quoting In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig., 114 F.3d 1410, 1434 (3d Cir. 1997)). In determining whether a claim would be futile, \u201cthe district court applies the same standard of legal sufficiency as applies under [Federal] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 12(b)(6).\u201d In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig., 114 F.3d at 1434. \u201cTo survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.\u201d Connelly v. Lane Const. Corp., 809 F.3d 780, 786 (3d Cir. 2016).", "samples": [{"hash": "4zPGLy0jRNU", "uri": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-paed-2_23-cv-02880/pdf/USCOURTS-paed-2_23-cv-02880-0.pdf", "label": "www.govinfo.gov", "score": 8.0951403149, "published": false}, {"hash": "8WjQIpsmcWf", "uri": "https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2023cv02880/611978/20/0.pdf?ts=1707230824", "label": "cases.justia.com", "score": 8.0485968515, "published": false}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "as-amended", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 36]}, {"key": "district-court", "type": "definition", "offset": [323, 337]}, {"key": "legal-sufficiency", "type": "definition", "offset": [367, 384]}, {"key": "civil-procedure", "type": "definition", "offset": [421, 436]}, {"key": "motion-to-dismiss", "type": "definition", "offset": [524, 541]}, {"key": "a-complaint-must-contain", "type": "clause", "offset": [543, 567]}], "hash": "8e6e356ef7164811dd9ea83d2c424b63", "id": 9}, {"snippet": "means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.\u201d Glassman v. Computervision Corp., 90 F.3d 617, 623 (1st Cir. 1996). \u201cIn reviewing for \u2018futility,\u2019 the district court applies the same standard of legal sufficiency as applies to a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.\u201d Id. On a motion to dismiss, the Court \u201cmust assume the truth of all well-plead[ed] facts and give . . . plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences", "samples": [{"hash": "7waT5nYq4sS", "uri": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-mad-1_14-cv-14714/pdf/USCOURTS-mad-1_14-cv-14714-1.pdf", "label": "www.govinfo.gov", "score": 6.054072553, "published": false}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "as-amended", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 36]}, {"key": "district-court", "type": "definition", "offset": [205, 219]}, {"key": "legal-sufficiency", "type": "definition", "offset": [249, 266]}, {"key": "applies-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [270, 280]}, {"key": "motion-to-dismiss", "type": "definition", "offset": [315, 332]}, {"key": "the-court", "type": "clause", "offset": [334, 343]}, {"key": "the-truth", "type": "definition", "offset": [357, 366]}, {"key": "the-benefit", "type": "definition", "offset": [420, 431]}], "hash": "68f562d97bc834a61de28df100dd6808", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClUST2oVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjELEhpEZWZpbml0aW9uU25pcHBldEdyb3VwX3Y1NiIRZnV0aWxpdHkjMDAwMDAwMGEMogECZW4YACAA", "definition": {"snippet": "means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.\").", "size": 51, "title": "Futility", "id": "futility", "examples": ["Lack of Temporal Limit in Extension Clause; Forfeiture; Undue Delay; Prejudice; <strong>Futility</strong>.", "Once GSK receives the <strong>Futility</strong> Data Package, GSK will review the data and determine whether the Beta-Thal Program using the [***] is scientifically Futile.", "If the DMC delivers to CPP a written report or notice on the <strong>Futility</strong> Analysis, then CPP shall deliver to Sucampo a copy of such report or notice within ten (10) days.", "If the DSMB issues a DSMB Terminate for Efficacy Notice, a DSMB Terminate for <strong>Futility</strong> Notice or a DSMB Continuation of the Study Notice, then the Warrants shall terminate and be of no further force or effect.", "Notwithstanding anything else contained herein to the contrary, if the HNC Clinical Trial is terminated prior to completion due to the occurrence of (a) HNC Clinical Trial <strong>Futility</strong> or (b) a Safety Concern, then SFJ shall not pay the Leftover Funding to Nektar nor shall it pay any other Development Costs except for those incurred in the orderly close-out of the HNC Clinical Trials.", "Any of the practices, methods and acts engaged in or approved by a significant portion of the electric <strong>Futility</strong> industry during the relevant time period, or any of the practices, methods and acts which, in the exercise of reasonable judgment in light of the facts known at the time the decision was made, could have been expected to accomplish the desired result at a reasonable cost consistent with good business practices, reliability, safety and expedition.", "Upon termination of the Beta-Thal Program as a result of Scientific <strong>Futility</strong>, then GSK shall have no further obligations to pay any future amounts associated with the Beta-Thal Program, including without limitation, payment of any milestone amounts for achievement of milestone events following termination.", "In the event of a <strong>Futility</strong> Issue, Merck shall promptly notify Moderna of such determination.", "For purposes of clarity, in the event that the amount funded by SFJ is less than $150,000,000 as a result of an early termination of the HNC Clinical Trials due to the occurrence of HNC Clinical Trial <strong>Futility</strong> or Safety Concern, the foregoing pro rata funding provision based on actual SFJ investment shall apply.", "For purposes of this Section 3, the &quot;<strong>Futility</strong> Date&quot; will be the date which is one hundred twenty (120) days after the date of closing of the Palmera Merger."], "related": [["utility", "Utility", "Utility"], ["utility-system", "Utility system", "Utility system"], ["outages", "Outages", "Outages"], ["corrective-measure", "Corrective Measure", "Corrective Measure"], ["corrective-maintenance", "Corrective Maintenance", "Corrective Maintenance"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-06T21:56:50+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}