Could reasonably be expected to definition

Could reasonably be expected to means there must be a reasonable expectation that disclosure could prejudice the competitive position of a third party. The Supreme Court of Canada set out the standard of proof for harms-based provisions as follows:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Could reasonably be expected to means there must be a reasonable expectation that disclosure could result in financial loss or gain to a third party. The Supreme Court of Canada set out the standard of proof for harms-based provisions as follows:
Sample 1Sample 2
Could reasonably be expected to means there must be a reasonable expectation that disclosure could prejudice the economic interests of the government institution or the Government of Saskatchewan…
Sample 1Sample 2

Examples of Could reasonably be expected to in a sentence

  • Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual.

  • Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.

  • Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

  • Could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the preparation and presentation of those financial statements.

  • Could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the preparation and presentation of those financial statements.Such errors include the effects of mathematical mistakes, mistakes in applying accounting policies, oversights, or misinterpretations of facts, and fraud.Where those errors are thought to be material, an adjustment will be entered into the financial statements comparative year balances, and the columns headed restated.

  • Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local, or for- eign agency or authority or any pri- vate institution which furnished infor- mation on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency con- ducting a lawful national security in- telligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source.

  • Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of others.

  • Could reasonably be expected to be satisfiedWhat is required by the evidential test is that there is an objectively reasonable prospect of a conviction on the evidence.

  • Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source.

  • Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy of a living person, including surviving family members of an individual identified in such a record.


More Definitions of Could reasonably be expected to

Could reasonably be expected to means there must be a reasonable expectation that disclosure could prejudice the economic interests of the government institution or the Government of Saskatchewan. The Supreme Court of Canada set out the standard of proof for harms-based provisions as follows:
Sample 1
Could reasonably be expected to. - this means that the decision maker needs to have regard to whether this is something which could actually happen or whether this an event which it is considered may happen. Decision makers should have regard to showing why they believe something will happen.
Sample 1

Related to Could reasonably be expected to

  • Unreasonably impracticable means that the measures necessary to comply with the regulations require such a high investment of risk, money, time, or any other resource or asset that the operation of a marijuana establishment is not worthy of being carried out in practice by a reasonably prudent businessperson.

  • Step-In Notice has the meaning set out in Section 3.1;

  • Benchmark Transition Event means the occurrence of one or more of the following events with respect to the then-current Benchmark:

  • Satisfactory Progress means that the Applicant, including any Person with an ownership interest in the Applicant or Development Team member, has presented evidence, satisfactory to ADOH, that each Project for which the Applicant has received a Determination of Qualification, Reservation, or Allocation in Arizona or any other state, has been Placed in Service on time or otherwise is progressing without unreasonable delay through the various phases of development, i.e., financing, permitting, construction, certificate of occupancy, and rehabilitation.

  • Claim Determination Period means a calendar year. However, it does not include any part of a year during which a person has no coverage under This Plan, or any part of a year before the date this COB provision or a similar provision takes effect.

  • Remediation Period means the time period between the first occurrence of the Remediation Event and the resolution of such Remediation Event which period may not exceed a total of ninety (90) days unless extended pursuant to Section 11.4.

  • Written Testing-the-Waters Communication means any Testing-the-Waters Communication that is a written communication within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act.

  • Claim Period means the tax year for individuals required to file Montana individual income tax returns and the calendar year for individuals not required to file returns.

  • Defects Notification Period means the period for notifying defects in the Works or a Section (as the case may be) under Sub-Clause 11.1 [Completion of Outstanding Work and Remedying Defects], which extends over 365 days except if otherwise stated in the SCC (with any extension under Sub-Clause 11.3 [Extension of Defects Notification Period]), calculated from the date on which the Works or Section is completed as certified under Sub-Clause 10.1[Taking Over of the Works and Sections].