Confusingly Similar definition

Confusingly Similar. (or “likely to cause confusion”) means, with respect to any use of a Xxxx or elements of trade dress that are protectable under applicable law, that such use would be determined to give rise to a likelihood of confusion pursuant to federal trademark law as interpreted and applied in the federal courts in the State of New York.

Confusingly Similar means anything that is likely to cause confusion to the relevant consuming public about the source of a sales service using the Trademarks or that, intentionally or unintentionally, conflicts with the outlined scope of this Agreement, which guarantees exclusivity to Licensee for the use of the Trademarks solely in connection with Licensee’s Operations.

Confusingly Similar means anything that is likely to cause confusion to the relevant consuming public about the source of a sales service using the Trademarks or that, intentionally or unintentionally, conflicts with the outlined scope of this Agreement, which guarantees exclusivity to Licensee for the use of the Trademarks solely in connection with Licensee’s Operations. (e) “Confusamente Semelhante” significa qualquer coisa que provavelmente confundirá o público consumidor relevante em relação à fonte de um serviço de vendas que use as Marcas, ou que, intencionalmente ou não, entre em conflito com o escopo delineado neste Contrato, que garante exclusividade à Licenciada para utilizar as Marcas unicamente em conexão com as Operações da Licenciada.

Examples of Confusingly Similar in a sentence

• Confusingly Similar – 19 U.S.C. 1595a(c)(2)(C) for violation of 15 U.S.C. 1124If the trademark is not identical to, or indistinguishable from the genuine mark, but is likely to cause confusion or mistake by the average consumer, then it is confusingly similar ( i.e., a “Ray Bane” mark on sunglasses would be considered confusingly similar to the genuine mark “Ray Ban”).

• Identical / Confusingly Similar The Complainant, first established in 1962, is one of the largest retailers worldwide.

• Pleasantville, New Jersey 08232 The local agency will investigate reported violations and follow-up, when appropriate with the local UI office.

• Whether the Domain Names are Identical or Confusingly Similar to Plaintiff’s Marks.

• The Complaint alleges that the domain name is Confusingly Similar (as defined in the CDRP) to its trade marks, was adopted in bad faith and that the registrant has no legitimate interest in it.

• Findings Identical / Confusingly Similar Pursuant to Paragraph 4(a) (i) of the Policy, a complainant must prove that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights.

• There are no major weaknesses in internal control of a continuing nature.5) a.

• Identical / Confusingly Similar The Complainant states that the first WAL-MART store was opened in the United States in 1962 and that since then the Complainant's business has grown enormously.

• Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration which predate by many years the date of registration of the disputed domain name by the Respondent.

• Identical and/or Confusingly Similar Complainant has established rights in the TEXACO mark through registration of the mark with the USPTO.