Examples of Challenge Jurisdiction in a sentence
LES Engineering should be consulted before installation about alternate service-delivery points.• Generally, LES will inspect all ditches and conduits installed on the LES-side of the service- delivery point and the State Electrical Inspector will inspect all the electrical facilities on the load-side of the service delivery point.
On August 13, 2014, Defendant Shelby Tygart filed a Motion for Limited Appearance to Challenge Jurisdiction and Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16), arguing that Plaintiff’s suit is based on phone calls she did not make, rather, independent contractors made, and that she does not have the requisite minimum contacts with New Mexico for this Court to assert personal jurisdiction over her.
Challenge in such Challenge Jurisdiction against the Clawback Amount until reimbursed in full; and (B) any unreimbursed portion of the Clawback Amount outstanding at the conclusion of the Royalty Term in all countries and jurisdictions in the Territory shall be paid to Lilly within [***] days after receipt by ImmunoGen of an invoice from Lilly therefor.
Arbitration Tribunal-Appointment, Challenge, Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal6.
M.R. Hamilton, Always Challenge Jurisdiction, AFREECOUNTRY.COM (Apr.
The individual whose license or certificate is being suspended or revoked shall not be found to have violated any provision of a code of ethics of an organization not appropriate to the individual's profession.
Prosecution Response to Veseli Defence Application for Leave to Appeal Decision on Motion to Challenge Jurisdiction on Basis of Violations of the Constitution, 6 October 2021.
Copies of the postcard and reply card are included in Appendix A; copies of the reply cards that were returned with comments are included in Appendix B (Table of Document Numbers with Issue Categories and Coded Public Scoping Comments).
Stephenson, III, on August 30, 2004.Accordingly, Respondent’s Motion to Challenge Jurisdiction of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board was overruled.Respondent’s Motion for a ContinuanceRespondent’s counsel next moved to continue this matter.In support of his Motion for a Continuance, Respondent’s counsel argued that he had not been consulted regarding the setting of the pre-hearing conference date of October 12, 2004, or the hearing date of October 22, 2004.
Petitioners First Raised any Intent to Challenge Jurisdiction as to Non-Resident Cases (85% of the Cases) on February 10, 2014 ..................................................................