{"component": "definition", "props": {"groups": [{"samples": [{"hash": "jxJOAy5hdeJ", "uri": "/contracts/jxJOAy5hdeJ#case-2", "label": "General Model Grant Agreement", "score": 25.5389559558, "published": true}, {"hash": "cVmpHHSbVd5", "uri": "/contracts/cVmpHHSbVd5#case-2", "label": "Model Grant Agreement", "score": 23.3641341547, "published": true}, {"hash": "9bVsUYoNeFq", "uri": "/contracts/9bVsUYoNeFq#case-2", "label": "General Model Grant Agreement", "score": 23.3641341547, "published": true}], "size": 9, "snippet_links": [{"key": "specific-activity", "type": "definition", "offset": [39, 56]}, {"key": "commission-decision", "type": "clause", "offset": [93, 112]}, {"key": "unit-costs", "type": "definition", "offset": [121, 131]}, {"key": "in-order-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [149, 160]}, {"key": "costs-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [171, 179]}, {"key": "indirect-costs", "type": "definition", "offset": [226, 240]}, {"key": "equipment-needed", "type": "clause", "offset": [258, 274]}, {"key": "the-action", "type": "clause", "offset": [279, 289]}, {"key": "case-3", "type": "definition", "offset": [291, 297]}, {"key": "a-unit", "type": "definition", "offset": [343, 349]}, {"key": "cost-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [350, 357]}, {"key": "laboratory-analysis", "type": "definition", "offset": [375, 394]}, {"key": "the-option", "type": "clause", "offset": [467, 477]}, {"key": "laboratory-technicians", "type": "clause", "offset": [537, 559]}, {"key": "equipment-used", "type": "clause", "offset": [596, 610]}, {"key": "the-beneficiary", "type": "clause", "offset": [612, 627]}, {"key": "actual-costs", "type": "clause", "offset": [645, 657]}, {"key": "personnel-costs", "type": "clause", "offset": [718, 733]}, {"key": "but-excluding", "type": "clause", "offset": [736, 749]}, {"key": "covered-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [838, 848]}, {"key": "the-unit", "type": "clause", "offset": [849, 857]}], "snippet": "A is a beneficiary in an action with a specific activity on \u2018intelligent buildings\u2019, where a Commission decision setting unit costs has been adopted in order to cover the costs of purchasing and operating (personnel + related indirect costs (overheads)) the equipment needed for the action. Case 3: A Commission decision allows for the use of a unit cost of 30 Euro for each laboratory analysis of the samples collected in an action. This is included in the GA under the option of article 5.2 (f). That unit cost covers the costs of the laboratory technicians involved in the analysis and of the equipment used. The beneficiary will declare the actual costs of the direct personnel working in the action under \u2018direct personnel costs\u2019, but excluding the costs of the laboratory technicians analysing the samples, because they are already covered by the unit cost under \u2018specific category of costs\u2019.", "hash": "aa7b9c7edb019d80213bca39a4116d69", "id": 1}, {"samples": [{"hash": "1zjUo24Facz", "uri": "https://avukati.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Prevention-of-Money-laundering-and-funding-terrorism-Subsidiary-Legislation.pdf", "label": "Notice", "score": 7.0, "published": false}, {"hash": "g0uu0uzPY6O", "uri": "https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/3944/file/Malta_Regulations_Prevention_of_laundering_Funding_Terrorism_2008_EN.pdf", "label": "www.legislationline.org", "score": 3.0, "published": false}], "size": 4, "snippet_links": [{"key": "regardless-of-any", "type": "clause", "offset": [36, 53]}, {"key": "in-respect-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [78, 91]}, {"key": "any-person", "type": "clause", "offset": [109, 119]}, {"key": "the-transaction", "type": "clause", "offset": [129, 144]}, {"key": "the-applicant", "type": "clause", "offset": [168, 181]}, {"key": "engaged-in", "type": "definition", "offset": [224, 234]}, {"key": "money-laundering", "type": "clause", "offset": [235, 251]}, {"key": "the-funding", "type": "clause", "offset": [255, 266]}, {"key": "another-person", "type": "definition", "offset": [333, 347]}], "snippet": "' (suspicion) means any case where, regardless of any exemption or threshold, in respect of any transaction, any person handling the transaction knows or suspects that the applicant for business may have been, is, or may be engaged in money laundering or the funding of terrorism, or that the transaction is carried out on behalf of another person who may have been, is, or may be engaged in money laundering or the funding of terrorism;", "hash": "dbd54cebf5606f0e7b7be05e758864ef", "id": 2}, {"samples": [{"hash": "1kfDmv69kKm", "uri": "/contracts/1kfDmv69kKm#case-2", "label": "Partnership Agreement", "score": 34.2915676975, "published": true}, {"hash": "1DQpuIswbRM", "uri": "/contracts/1DQpuIswbRM#case-2", "label": "Partnership Agreement", "score": 30.9621596641, "published": true}, {"hash": "8KZhRdct70P", "uri": "/contracts/8KZhRdct70P#case-2", "label": "Collective Bargaining Agreement", "score": 24.5847226476, "published": true}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "holiday-off", "type": "clause", "offset": [12, 23]}, {"key": "reduced-schedule", "type": "clause", "offset": [37, 53]}, {"key": "hours-worked", "type": "definition", "offset": [80, 92]}, {"key": "benefit-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [114, 126]}, {"key": "hours-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [180, 188]}, {"key": "banked-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [189, 200]}, {"key": "case-3", "type": "definition", "offset": [202, 208]}, {"key": "hours-straight-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [273, 292]}, {"key": "time-and-a-half", "type": "definition", "offset": [309, 324]}, {"key": "permit-employees", "type": "clause", "offset": [381, 397]}, {"key": "work-scheduling", "type": "clause", "offset": [421, 436]}], "snippet": "Bob has the holiday off, and works a reduced schedule. He gets 38 hours pay (30 hours worked plus 8 hours holiday benefit time. If he wants his usual 40 hours pay, he has to use 2 hours of banked time. Case 3: Bob has the holiday off, but works a full schedule. He gets 40 hours straight time, and 8 hours at time and a half (because he didn't get a reduced schedule.) Purpose: To permit employees greater flexibility in work scheduling while ensuring all responsibilities are fulfilled. Policy:", "hash": "f45f04370ec8aeb4985854ad49be0db0", "id": 3}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4cIbCeSJWUA", "uri": "/contracts/4cIbCeSJWUA#case-2", "label": "Learning Agreement", "score": 28.8705423083, "published": true}, {"hash": "gxbbuMWKwx1", "uri": "/contracts/gxbbuMWKwx1#case-2", "label": "Learning Agreement", "score": 21.0280629706, "published": true}, {"hash": "aC1CclDcKb8", "uri": "/contracts/aC1CclDcKb8#case-2", "label": "Learning Agreement", "score": 20.9801505818, "published": true}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "partial-match", "type": "definition", "offset": [31, 44]}, {"key": "according-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [50, 62]}, {"key": "received-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [79, 90]}, {"key": "the-selected", "type": "clause", "offset": [120, 132]}, {"key": "learning-activity", "type": "definition", "offset": [133, 150]}, {"key": "the-period", "type": "clause", "offset": [196, 206]}, {"key": "a-note", "type": "definition", "offset": [221, 227]}], "snippet": "The Erasmus Board highlights a partial match and, according to the suggestions received by the UNIBO professor teaching the selected learning activity, asks for an exam integration at UNIBO after the period abroad (i.e., a note is added to the LA)", "hash": "d9c77e457081939683b5d4157b30f45b", "id": 4}, {"samples": [{"hash": "hXZQpEgSTWk", "uri": "https://www.oas.org/ext/Portals/33/Files/MLA/bel_mla_leg2_en.pdf", "label": "www.oas.org", "score": 5.0, "published": false}, {"hash": "r3kgc6pEUo", "uri": "http://www.belizelaw.org/web/lawadmin/PDF%20files/cap104s.pdf", "label": "www.belizelaw.org", "score": 5.0, "published": false}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "in-respect-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [22, 35]}, {"key": "any-person", "type": "clause", "offset": [61, 71]}, {"key": "the-transaction", "type": "clause", "offset": [81, 96]}, {"key": "the-applicant", "type": "clause", "offset": [120, 133]}, {"key": "business-is", "type": "definition", "offset": [138, 149]}, {"key": "engaged-in", "type": "definition", "offset": [150, 160]}, {"key": "money-laundering", "type": "clause", "offset": [161, 177]}, {"key": "another-person", "type": "definition", "offset": [230, 244]}], "snippet": "means any case where, in respect of any one-off transaction, any person handling the transaction knows or suspects that the applicant for business is engaged in money laundering or that the transaction is carried out on behalf of another person engaged in money laundering.", "hash": "a880afdd7d7fe6d9b100c772c6d45095", "id": 5}, {"samples": [{"hash": "aqZ8RxPwTj1", "uri": "/contracts/aqZ8RxPwTj1#case-2", "label": "Performance Unit Award Agreement (Weatherford International Ltd./Switzerland)", "score": 21.5859000684, "published": true}, {"hash": "69ob5gwjhAr", "uri": "/contracts/69ob5gwjhAr#case-2", "label": "Performance Unit Award Agreement (Weatherford International Ltd./Switzerland)", "score": 21.2217659138, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-company", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 11]}, {"key": "case-3", "type": "definition", "offset": [75, 81]}, {"key": "competitor-group", "type": "definition", "offset": [133, 149]}], "snippet": "The Company\u2019s TSR is below the 25th percentile, earning a zero multiplier. Case 3: The Company\u2019s achieves the highest TSR versus the Competitor Group, earning a 2.0 multiplier.", "hash": "c57704dbeceeb04988dbe70235ba52a2", "id": 6}, {"samples": [{"hash": "lpdWcMIddqW", "uri": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/1401/body/data.pdf", "label": "www.legislation.gov.uk", "score": 8.8631074606, "published": false}, {"hash": "f6lgNM7VzfP", "uri": "http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/1401/part/4/chapter/1/made?view=plain", "label": "www.legislation.gov.uk", "score": 8.1704312115, "published": false}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "authorised-person", "type": "clause", "offset": [33, 50]}, {"key": "parent-institution", "type": "definition", "offset": [61, 79]}, {"key": "required-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [80, 91]}, {"key": "chapter-2", "type": "clause", "offset": [92, 101]}, {"key": "title-2", "type": "clause", "offset": [105, 112]}, {"key": "part-1", "type": "clause", "offset": [116, 122]}, {"key": "capital-requirements-regulation", "type": "definition", "offset": [130, 161]}, {"key": "requirements-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [177, 196]}, {"key": "consolidated-basis", "type": "clause", "offset": [213, 231]}, {"key": "case-3", "type": "definition", "offset": [273, 279]}], "snippet": "means circumstances where an FCA-authorised person is the UK parent institution required by Chapter 2 of Title 2 of Part 1 of the capital requirements regulation to comply with requirements of the regulation on a consolidated basis, other than circumstances falling within Case 3;", "hash": "5bde04aa3f282399690484b88fd78a3a", "id": 7}, {"samples": [{"hash": "6tm8Ar7Ss5C", "uri": "/contracts/6tm8Ar7Ss5C#case-2", "label": "Advance Pricing Agreement", "score": 23.340862423, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-firm", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 8]}, {"key": "tax-benefit", "type": "clause", "offset": [20, 31]}, {"key": "the-state", "type": "clause", "offset": [37, 46]}, {"key": "similarly-situated", "type": "definition", "offset": [47, 65]}, {"key": "tax-system", "type": "clause", "offset": [104, 114]}, {"key": "no-tax", "type": "clause", "offset": [116, 122]}, {"key": "firm-a", "type": "definition", "offset": [132, 138]}, {"key": "independent-firm", "type": "clause", "offset": [145, 161]}], "snippet": "The firm receives a tax benefit from the state Similarly situated independent firms under the reference tax system (no tax benefit) Firm A is an independent firm receiving a tax benefit from the state Firm B is an MNE affiliate receiving a tax benefit from the state", "hash": "8d50fd85e3fe70d364679027fc79693e", "id": 8}, {"samples": [{"hash": "14JvBaQrVMP", "uri": "/contracts/14JvBaQrVMP#case-2", "label": "End User License Agreement", "score": 23.4134154689, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "if-m", "type": "clause", "offset": [309, 313]}, {"key": "this-note", "type": "clause", "offset": [392, 401]}], "snippet": "All the \u03b4\u03b8 = 1 (i.e. no e\u03b8 \u2208 M ). Note that these two cases cover all possible situations, even when p = 2, since if \u03b4\u03b8 /\u2208 [0, 1] then all the r\u03b8 = 0 (see (2) of Lemma 7.1.2) which contradicts the irreducibility of T (M ) = T (f\u2217N ). Remark 7.2.2. Let M \u2208 ModSD. In this section we will repeatedly use that \u2022 if m \u2208 M then \u03d5(m) \u2208 M , \u2022 if m \u2208 M is such that \u03d5(m) \u2208 up+1M then m \u2208 uM . To see this note that if gri(Mk) = 0 for i < 0 then F 0Mk = F\u20141Mk = . . . = Mk and so F 0M = M , i.e. if m \u2208 M then \u03d5(m) \u2208 M . If gri(Mk) = 0 for i > p then Fp+1Mk = Fp+2Mk = . . . = 0 and so Fp+1M \u2282 uM , i.e if \u03d5(m) \u2208 up+1M then m \u2208 uM .", "hash": "e3cd5313f103472335530c443ac230e7", "id": 9}, {"samples": [{"hash": "grlO0nSFuJz", "uri": "/contracts/grlO0nSFuJz#case-2", "label": "Block Design Based Key Agreement for Group Data Sharing", "score": 26.2958448342, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "to-receive", "type": "definition", "offset": [35, 45]}], "snippet": "For participanti(i \u2264 k), they need to receive messages from participantj(j = mk + 1 + MODk(i 1)(m 1), j = i).", "hash": "529e6b9aeaa13f4dacee7f9bf3cc86c1", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClMSTWoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3Rzci8LEhpEZWZpbml0aW9uU25pcHBldEdyb3VwX3Y1NiIPY2FzZS0yIzAwMDAwMDBhDKIBAmVuGAAgAA==", "definition": {"size": 51, "title": "Case 2", "snippet": "A is a beneficiary in an action with a specific activity on \u2018intelligent buildings\u2019, where a Commission decision setting unit costs has been adopted in order to cover the costs of purchasing and operating (personnel + related indirect costs (overheads)) the equipment needed for the action. Case 3: A Commission decision allows for the use of a unit cost of 30 Euro for each laboratory analysis of the samples collected in an action. This is included in the GA under the option of article 5.2 (f). That unit cost covers the costs of the laboratory technicians involved in the analysis and of the equipment used. The beneficiary will declare the actual costs of the direct personnel working in the action under \u2018direct personnel costs\u2019, but excluding the costs of the laboratory technicians analysing the samples, because they are already covered by the unit cost under \u2018specific category of costs\u2019.", "id": "case-2", "examples": ["The cases without the SPS (Case 1) and with the SPS (<strong>Case 2</strong>) are described in Section 3.4.", "The cases without the Project (Case 1) and with the Project (<strong>Case 2</strong>) are described in Section 3.4.", "When the USD exchange rate is higher at the date of the transaction processing <strong>Case 2</strong>.", "<strong>Case 2</strong>: the locks set of every correct process is empty at the end of phase ph \u2212 1.", "The goal of Use <strong>Case 2</strong> is to provide customer resiliency during PSPS events and other planned grid outages.", "<strong>Case 2</strong> If not more than two valid runs of the specified runs exceed the expected sound pressure level of paragraph 4.5.4.3. by not more than 2 dB the compliance of the vehicle is acceptable.", "<strong>Case 2</strong>: 3 BDs are counted for two linked candidates: Alt1: Overbooking is per individual SS set as in Rel.", "The breakdown of the performance measures is as follows: \u2022 12.5% on achieving Case 1 EBITDA (2.5% each year) \u2022 12.5% on achieving Case 1 free cash flow(2.5% each year) \u2022 12.5% on achieving <strong>Case 2</strong> EBITDA (2.5% each year) \u2022 12.5% on achieving <strong>Case 2</strong> free cash flow(2.5% each year) \u2022 Any portion of the performance option that does not vest in any given fiscal year may vest in future years if certain cumulative EBITDA or free cash flow targets are achieved.", "Case (2) forces failures to propagate in a bottom-up manner, i.e., a gate is not evaluated before all its children have been evaluated.", "If the Concessionaire pays the minimum amount due each year i.e. in 10 equal annual instalments) Anniversary of the Appointed Date Instalment of Annuity paid Instalment of Annuity payable with interest Say the Annuity is INR 30 Cr, the amount payable shall be: <strong>Case 2</strong> (An illustrative case where the Concessionaire choses to pay more than the minimum due instalments each year i.e. the Concessionaire finishes payment of Annuity earlier than 10 years)."], "related": [["reference-evapotranspiration", "Reference evapotranspiration", "Reference evapotranspiration"], ["table-3", "Table 3", "Table 3"], ["digital-signal-level-0-ds-0", "Digital Signal Level 0 (DS-0)", "Digital Signal Level 0 (DS-0)"], ["digital-signal-level-0", "Digital Signal Level 0", "Digital Signal Level 0"], ["check-meter", "Check Meter", "Check Meter"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-07T00:35:48+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}