Examples of Alaska companies in a sentence
Within the constraints of law, Buyer voluntarily agrees to employ Alaska residents and Alaska companies to the extent they are available, willing, and at least as qualified as other candidates for work performed in Alaska in connection with this Agreement.
Tesoro agrees to employ Alaska residents and Alaska companies to the extent they are available, willing, and at least as qualified as other candidates for work performed in Alaska in connection with the proposed sale.
Alaska companies would likely benefit from reduced tariffs in this sector as a result of the agreement.
To be sure, Alaska companies rely on a mix of middle-mile platforms, including fiber, microwave, satellite.
To date, Coeur has awarded $42 million in construction contracts, 85 percent of which have been awarded to Alaska companies.
Economic output is the gross sale of Agrium’s production plus the impacts of company and employee spending in support of Agrium’s operations.• For every one thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of Cook Inlet natural gas used by Agrium for feedstock and power generation, over $9 in total Alaska economic output is generated.• In 2003, Agrium spent $77 million on goods and services provided by almost400 Alaska companies.
The buyer agrees to employ Alaska residents and Alaska companies to the extent they are available, willing, and at least as qualified as other candidates for work performed in Alaska in connection with the proposed sale.
For the United States generally, half ofU.S. exports are generated by U.S. multinationals.Small and medium-sized Alaska companies also indirectly export when they supply goods and services to larger Alaska exporters.
In 2004, the project had average annual employment of 39 direct workers.10 Placer Dome’s total 2004 exploration expenditures for Donlin Creek were about $7.2 million, of which approximately 65 percent was spent with Alaska companies.
Plaintiff contends that AS 45.45.710 was designed to protect local Alaska companies from large manufacturers like defendant in situations just like that presented by this case and thus the statute’s definition of “unused” can be ignored in this case.AS 45.45.710 only requires defendant to buy back “unused” equipment, which is defined as merchandise still in its original factory packaging or container.