AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • February 19th, 2002 • Novo Networks Inc • Radiotelephone communications • New York
Contract Type FiledFebruary 19th, 2002 Company Industry Jurisdiction
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • August 14th, 2002 • Pac-West Telecomm Inc • Radio broadcasting stations • Colorado
Contract Type FiledAugust 14th, 2002 Company Industry Jurisdiction
IRU AGREEMENT DATED AS OF MAY 2, 1997 BY AND BETWEEN QWEST COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION ("QWEST") AND GTE INTELLIGENT NETWORK SERVICES INCORPORATED ("GTE") TABLE OF CONTENTSIru Agreement • May 16th, 1997 • Qwest Communications International Inc • Telephone communications (no radiotelephone) • Colorado
Contract Type FiledMay 16th, 1997 Company Industry Jurisdiction
INDEFEASIBLE RIGHT OF USE AGREEMENTIru Agreement • May 14th, 2020
Contract Type FiledMay 14th, 2020THIS IRU AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made, entered into, and effective as of the 28th day of September, 2001, by and between McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. an Iowa corporation (“McLeodUSA”) and Norlight Telecommunications, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (“IRU Grantee”).
IRU AGREEMENT (conformed version incorporating Amendments 1, 2 and 3 through 12/9/98)Iru Agreement • August 18th, 1999 • Williams Communications Group Inc • Telephone communications (no radiotelephone) • Oklahoma
Contract Type FiledAugust 18th, 1999 Company Industry Jurisdiction
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • November 15th, 2004 • Savvis Communications Corp • Services-business services, nec
Contract Type FiledNovember 15th, 2004 Company IndustryTHIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENT (“Fifth Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 15th day of February, 2001, by and between LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Grantor”) and CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC., a District of Columbia corporation (“Grantee”). This Amendment modifies the First Amendment to Cost Sharing and IRU Agreement dated August 11, 2000 between Grantor and Grantee (“First Amendment”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the First Amendment.
TENTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • November 15th, 2004 • Savvis Communications Corp • Services-business services, nec
Contract Type FiledNovember 15th, 2004 Company IndustryTHIS TENTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENT (this “Tenth Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 27th day of August, 2003, by and between LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (“Grantor”) and CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, (“Grantee”).
IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • November 30th, 2010 • Arkansas
Contract Type FiledNovember 30th, 2010 JurisdictionThis IRU Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of _______________, 2010 (“Effective Date”) by and between the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas, acting for and on behalf of the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, specifically the Arkansas Research and Education Optical Network, a consortium of Arkansas's public four-year universities with offices located at 155 Razorback Road, Fayetteville, AR 72701 ("Customer") and ___________________________________________ (“Provider”). Provider and Customer may also be referred to as the “Parties” or “Party” as the context allows.
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • November 15th, 2004 • Savvis Communications Corp • Services-business services, nec
Contract Type FiledNovember 15th, 2004 Company IndustryTHIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENT (this “Fourth Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the day of January, 2001, by and between LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (“Grantor”) and CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC., a District of Columbia corporation, (“Grantee”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • November 15th, 2004 • Savvis Communications Corp • Services-business services, nec
Contract Type FiledNovember 15th, 2004 Company IndustryTHIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENT (this “Sixth Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 7th day of August, 2001, by and between LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (“Grantor”) and CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, (“Grantee”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.
COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • November 15th, 2004 • Savvis Communications Corp • Services-business services, nec
Contract Type FiledNovember 15th, 2004 Company IndustryTHIS COST SHARING AND IRU AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 25th day of May, 1999, by and between LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Grantor”) and CABLE & WIRELESS USA, INC., a District of Columbia corporation (“Grantee”).
RECITALSIru Agreement • July 16th, 1999 • Bti Telecom Corp • Telephone communications (no radiotelephone)
Contract Type FiledJuly 16th, 1999 Company Industry
IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • May 7th, 1998 • Bti Telecom Corp • Telephone communications (no radiotelephone) • Colorado
Contract Type FiledMay 7th, 1998 Company Industry Jurisdiction
SEA-ME-WE 3 STANDARD IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • November 30th, 2012
Contract Type FiledNovember 30th, 2012THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of _,_ _, between the international telecommunications entities identified as “Grantors” in Annex 1 of this Agreement and the international telecommunications entity identified as the “IRU Purchaser” in Annex 1 of this Agreement.
IRU AGREEMENT BETWEEN TOWN A Municipal Light Plant (The Owner) AND TOWN B Municipal Light Plant (The User)Iru Agreement • March 10th, 2018 • Massachusetts
Contract Type FiledMarch 10th, 2018 JurisdictionThis AGREEMENT for the indefeasible right to use (or “IRU”) fiber optic facilities (“IRU Agreement”) is made this __ day of ___________, 2018, by and between _____________________________ Municipal Light Plant, a Massachusetts municipal lighting plant, with offices at _____________________________, MA (hereinafter "Owner”), and ___________________________ Municipal Light Plant, a Massachusetts municipal lighting plant, with offices at _______________________________________ (hereinafter "User”) (individually, a “Party”, together the “Parties”).
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • March 15th, 2004 • Itc Deltacom Inc • Telephone communications (no radiotelephone)
Contract Type FiledMarch 15th, 2004 Company IndustryThis AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO IRU AGREEMENT (“Amendment”), dated as of this 25th day of August, 2003, is by and between QWEST COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“Qwest”), and BUSINESS TELECOM, INC., a North Carolina corporation (“BTI”). Each of Qwest and BTI is sometimes referred to herein as a “Party,” and both of them, together, are sometimes referred to herein as the “Parties.”
SYNDEO Networks, Inc. Indefeasible Right of Use Master AgreementIru Agreement • November 9th, 2021 • Illinois
Contract Type FiledNovember 9th, 2021 JurisdictionTHIS IRU AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made, entered into, and effective as of the day of , 2021 , by and between Ogle County, IL (“IRU Grantee” or “DBA”) and Syndeo Networks, Inc. (SYNDEO), an Illinois Corporation (“Grantor”).
IRU AGREEMENTIru Agreement • June 18th, 1997 • Qwest Communications International Inc • Telephone communications (no radiotelephone) • Colorado
Contract Type FiledJune 18th, 1997 Company Industry Jurisdiction