WOC Assignment Methods Sample Clauses
The "WOC Assignment Methods" clause defines the procedures and requirements for assigning work, tasks, or responsibilities under a contract or agreement. Typically, this clause outlines how assignments are communicated, whether through written notice, electronic systems, or other specified methods, and may set timelines or approval processes for such assignments. For example, it might require that all work orders be issued in writing and approved by a designated manager before work begins. The core function of this clause is to ensure clarity and consistency in how work is delegated, reducing misunderstandings and disputes about task assignments.
WOC Assignment Methods. If Agency representatives participate on the LPA selection committees, they may only serve as technical experts, advisors or facilitators and will not count as one of the “voting” members. Detailed Tier-2 Selection Procedures, forms and other guidance and resources for LPAs are available on the Internet at the following website: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ODOT/CS/OPO/Pages/lap_select.aspx
WOC Assignment Methods. WOCs will be assigned using the following methods:
1.1.1 Option 1 - Mini Solicitation For WOCs that are anticipated to exceed $150,000 (including anticipated amendments), Agency will conduct a streamlined mini-solicitation via e-mail sent to the firms with PAs awarded from the associated RFP. Agency may also conduct a mini-solicitation as described in this section for WOCs anticipated to be under $150,000. The mini-solicitation will be brief and will include, but is not limited to: • Response deadline and location for submittals, • Project description and objectives (and information from Project prospectus, if available), • Programmed budget for construction and right-of-way (if applicable), • Schedule to complete the requested Services, and programmed bid let date (if applicable), • General scope of work and period of performance expected under the WOC, • If available, a detailed SOW (required if cost proposals will be evaluated on Related Services projects). The SOW should include the work to be performed; location of work; deliverable schedule; any applicable performance standards; items provided by Agency, if any; and any special requirements (e.g., travel, special knowledge). • Selection criteria and weighting.
WOC Assignment Methods. The Mini Solicitation WOC assignment method below applies to both Tier A PA Consultants and Tier B PA Consultants, for Agency projects and LPA projects. WOCs will be assigned using this method (but Agency reserves the right in its sole discretion to use any other methods permitted by applicable law).
WOC Assignment Methods. WOCs will be assigned using the following methods:
1.1.1 Option 1 - Mini Solicitation For WOCs that are anticipated to exceed $150,000 (including anticipated amendments), Agency will conduct a streamlined mini-solicitation via e-mail sent to the firms with PAs awarded from the associated RFP. Agency may also conduct a mini-solicitation as described in this section for WOCs anticipated to be under $150,000. The mini-solicitation will be brief and will include, but is not limited to: Response deadline and location for submittals, Project description and objectives (and information from project prospectus, if available), Programmed budget for construction and right-of-way (if applicable), Schedule to complete the requested Services, and programmed bid let date (if applicable), General scope of work and period of performance expected under the WOC, If available, a detailed SOW (required if cost proposals will be evaluated on Related Services projects). The SOW should include the work to be performed; location of work; deliverable schedule; any applicable performance standards; items provided by Agency, if any; and any special requirements (e.g., travel, special knowledge). Selection criteria and weighting. Proposal Exceptions: Proposers awarded PAs are not required to propose on all mini-solicitations for WOC assignments, such as projects for which consultant lacks significant experience or lacks sufficient capacity of appropriately qualified staff during the projected period of performance.