Whirlpool Corp. Case No., 16-56666 (Dkt.## 168-169). wrinkles here which argue for the inapplicability of CAFA. First, persons who redeemed their Groupons are not limited to Promotional and Shipping Codes; they may obtain cash refunds. Second, while persons who did not redeem their Groupons are entitled only to Promotion and Shipping Codes, they are automatically being provided a more valuable version of the exact item they purchased. To put it another way, the original purchase of a Groupon that class members made was itself a purchase of a “coupon,” and under the settlement they are getting a better coupon than they originally purchased. The coupon provisions of CAFA were designed to require more scrutiny of settlements that provided only a “coupon” towards a further purchase, instead of remedying the underlying issue that led to the litigation. Here the more valuable “coupon” does address the underlying allegation that the original coupon (i.e. Groupon) had less value than purchasers would have understood. 12
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Class Action Settlement Agreement, Class Action Settlement Agreement