way. As an inducement to MS to enter into this Agreement, each of JRMH and H.
way. This Agreement has been, and upon their execution the New Stockholders Agreement and the New Registration Rights Agreement shall have been, duly executed and delivered by JRMH and H.H.A.WAY and (assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by all other parties hereto and thereto) this Agreement constitutes, and upon their execution the New Stockholders Agreement and the New Registration Rights Agreement shall constitute, legal, valid and binding obligations of JRMH and H.H.A.WAY enforceable against JRMH and H.H.A.WAY in accordance with their terms All corporate actions taken by JRMH and H.H.A.WAY have been duly authorized, and JRMH and H.H.A.WAY have not taken any action that in any material respect conflicts with, constitutes a default under or results in a violation of any provision of their statuts.
way. Prior or concurrent to the Closing, JRMH shall contribute 3.051 shares of BDHI to H.H.A.
way. The procedure noted under Paragraphs and shall not in a the terms and con constitute recourse beyond noted in Paragraph with respect to the processing of individual grievances.
way. The details of implementing the contents of Article III need to be additionally decided by mutual agreement of both parties.
way. The Prenup merely makes clear that if a couple permanently separates and their joint marital home is no longer functioning, the husband remains obligated to provide a specific amount of daily spousal support to the wife for as long as they remain married in the eyes of Jewish law that is, until he gives her a get. The husband is left technically free to withhold a get, but if he chooses to do so, he must bear the burdens and duties of marriage by continuing to support his wife at the agreed- living with or maintaining any actual relationship with their wives are unlikely to want to shoulder the financial responsibility of supporting them in a reasonable standard of living, a get soon after the functional dissolution of a marriage.14 When utilized, the BDA Prenup has proven to be a highly effective tool for ensuring that timely giving of a get.15 Additionally, it has been upheld as legally binding and enforceable by American courts.16 The BDA Prenup is not without its detractors, however. In 2015, Rabbi Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, a prominent halakhic authority for the areidi community in Israel issued a ruling strongly critical of the BDA Prenup.17 analysis of the issue is not persuasive. Part II provides a brief overview of the five principal arguments offered by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx to explain why the BDA Prenup does not succeed in avoiding the problem of a coerced get, and to explain why the Prenup and prenuptial agreements in general are a bad idea as a matter of communal religious policy. Part III presents responses to each of R Prenup rests on solid halakhic foundations. Part IV concludes with some closing observations regarding several important and interesting methodological and jurisprudential issues raised by Xxxxx Xxxxx relevance to Jewish law analysis and decision making in areas far beyond gittin and the agunah problem. In the summer of 2015, Rabbi Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, the Av Beit Din Edah areidit in Israel, circulated a responsum criticizing the BDA Prenup that explains why, in his view, concerns about adultery and multiplies mamzerim 18 Rabbi rooted in extra-legal policy concerns. This section explains each of these objections to the Prenup.
way. The Company further acknowledges that the Company's decision to enter into this Agreement has been based solely on an independent evaluation by the Company and its representatives.
