Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties Sample Clauses

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. ‘treaty congestion’, problem of, 5 treaty coordination/regime interaction, 13, 96, 125–40, 362 accountability and right process in, 138–40 compliance-management approach compared, 139 conceptions of international law in, 140–3 consent issues, 131–3 critique of pluralism in, 140 deep seabed mining dispute and, 209–10 defined, 125 GAL (global administrative law) and, 122, 139, 141 India–US Nuclear Deal conflict with NPT and, 340 institutional conflict, treaty conflicts giving rise to, 125, 126–7 institutional pluralism and, 133–5 justifications for, 129–40 limitations of, 366 modus vivendi argument for, 136–8 problematic aspects of, 125 propriety of interaction per se, within and without authorised forums, 130–1 value pluralism and, 135–8 Xxxxx, and Xxxxxxx and Xxxx, on, 127–9, 135, 138–9, 141, 362 treaty implementation, see effective implementation of treaties Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, 178, 190, 194 TRIPs (Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) Agreement, 6, 15 ‘true’ and ‘false’ treaty conflicts, 10–11, 225 UAE (United Arab Emirates), US civil nuclear cooperation agreement with, 302, 385, 392 Uganda BIA with US, 235 LRA (Lord’s Resistance Army), 235–9, 250, 251, 254, 277 self-referral to ICC, 234, 235–9, 245, 249, 251, 252–4, 275, 277 UPDF (Uganda People’s Defence Forces), 236, 250, 254, 277 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC), 152–61 allocation of mine sites, 374 Committee on Peaceful Uses of the Seabed, 153 common heritage principle in Resolution II and Part XI, 159–61 on compatibility of Provisional Understanding with Resolution II, 168–70 compromise efforts, 172–6 conflict between RSR and, overview of, 113, 149–52 divergences between RSR and, 165 equitable sharing/effective participation principle, 159–60 financial and technological aid, 156, 371 institutional conflict arising from treaty conflict, 126 ISA membership, 372–3 legality discourse, use of, 203–8 Moratorium Resolution, 154 NIEO movement and, 150, 153, 175, 188, 199 no-harm principle, 160 non-appropriation/non-alienation principle, 159 parallel system and site banking, 156, 371 Part XI regime, 155–8 pioneer investor provisions, 158–9, 179–87, 187–8, 201–2, 374–5 policies set out in, 371–3 prior to entry into force, 165–8 production policies, 156, 372 qualifications of licence applicants, 156, 372, 374 res communis, 172 review procedures, 372 rights and obligations under, 375 RSR members’ signature and ratification, 163, 168, 173, 198 UNCLOS III, 150, 155 UN Framework Convention o...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

  • Compliance with Federal Law, Regulations, and Executive Orders This is an acknowledgement that FEMA financial assistance will be used to fund all or a portion of the contract. The contractor will comply with all applicable Federal law, regulations, executive orders, FEMA policies, procedures, and directives.

  • Provisions in Conflict with Law or Regulations (a) The provisions of the Declaration of Trust are severable, and if the Trustees shall determine, with the advice of counsel, that any of such provisions is in conflict with the 1940 Act, the regulated investment company provisions of the Internal Revenue Code or with other applicable laws and regulations, the conflicting provision shall be deemed never to have constituted a part of the Declaration of Trust; provided, however, that such determination shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of the Declaration of Trust or render invalid or improper any action taken or omitted prior to such determination.

  • Provisions in Conflict with Law or Regulation (a) The provisions of this Declaration are severable, and if the Trustees shall determine, with the advice of counsel, that any of such provisions is in conflict with the 1940 Act, the regulated investment company provisions of the Internal Revenue Code or with other applicable laws and regulations, the conflicting provision shall be deemed never to have constituted a part of this Declaration; provided, however, that such determination shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this Declaration or render invalid or improper any action taken or omitted prior to such determination.

  • Application of Takeover Protections; Rights Agreements The Company and the Board of Directors have taken all necessary action, if any, in order to render inapplicable any control share acquisition, business combination, poison pill (including any distribution under a rights agreement) or other similar anti-takeover provision under the Company’s charter documents or the laws of its state of incorporation that is or could reasonably be expected to become applicable to any of the Purchasers as a result of the Purchasers and the Company fulfilling their obligations or exercising their rights under the Transaction Documents, including, without limitation, the Company’s issuance of the Securities and the Purchasers’ ownership of the Securities.

  • Sanctions Concerns and Anti Corruption Laws (a) No Loan Party, nor any Subsidiary, nor, to the knowledge of the Loan Parties, any director, officer, employee, agent, affiliate or representative thereof, is an individual or entity that is, or is owned or controlled by any individual or entity that is (i) currently the subject or target of any Sanctions, (ii) included on OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals, HMT’s Consolidated List of Financial Sanctions Targets and the Investment Ban List, or any similar list enforced by any other relevant sanctions authority or (iii) located, organized or resident in a Designated Jurisdiction.

  • LEAVE FOR REGULATORY BUSINESS AS PER THE TEACHERS’ ACT 1. Upon written request to the Superintendent or designate from the Ministry of Education, an employee who is appointed or elected to the BC Teachers’ Council or appointed to the Disciplinary or Professional Conduct Board shall be entitled to a leave of absence with pay and shall be deemed to be in the full employ of the board as defined in Article G.6.1.b.

  • Application of Takeover Protections; Rights Agreement The Company and its board of directors have taken all necessary action, if any, in order to render inapplicable any control share acquisition, interested stockholder, business combination, poison pill (including, without limitation, any distribution under a rights agreement), stockholder rights plan or other similar anti-takeover provision under the Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws or other organizational documents or the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation or otherwise which is or could become applicable to any Buyer as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including, without limitation, the Company’s issuance of the Securities and any Buyer’s ownership of the Securities. The Company and its board of directors have taken all necessary action, if any, in order to render inapplicable any stockholder rights plan or similar arrangement relating to accumulations of beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock or a change in control of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.

  • Application of Takeover Protections The Company and the Board of Directors have taken all necessary action, if any, in order to render inapplicable any control share acquisition, business combination, poison pill (including any distribution under a rights agreement) or other similar anti-takeover provision under the Company’s certificate of incorporation (or similar charter documents) or the laws of its state of incorporation that is or could become applicable to the Purchasers as a result of the Purchasers and the Company fulfilling their obligations or exercising their rights under the Transaction Documents, including without limitation as a result of the Company’s issuance of the Securities and the Purchasers’ ownership of the Securities.

  • File Naming Conventions Files will be named according to the following convention: {gTLD}_{YYYY-­‐MM-­‐DD}_{type}_S{#}_R{rev}.{ext} where:

  • CFR PART 200 Domestic Preferences for Procurements As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the non-Federal entity should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stag through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. Moreover, for purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum, plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe, aggregates such as concrete, class, including optical fiber, and lumber. Pursuant to the above, when federal funds are expended by ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, Vendor certifies that to the greatest extent practicable Vendor will provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). Does vendor agree? Yes

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.