Common use of Unacceptable Clause in Contracts

Unacceptable. This level of performance does not meet minimum expectations and requires urgent interventions and support.  Rating 2: Satisfies minimum expectations. This level of performance is acceptable and is in line with minimum expectations, but development and support are still required.  Rating 3: Good. Performance is good and meets expectations, but some areas are still in need of development and support.  Rating 4: Outstanding. Performance is outstanding and exceeds expectations. Although performance is excellent, continuous self-development and improvement are advised.

Unacceptable. This level of performance does not meet minimum expectations and requires urgent interventions and support.  ▪ Rating 2: Satisfies minimum expectations. This level of performance is acceptable and is in line with minimum expectations, but development and support are still required.  ▪ Rating 3: Good. Performance is good and meets expectations, but some areas are still in need of development and support.  ▪ Rating 4: Outstanding. Performance is outstanding and exceeds expectations. Although performance is excellent, continuous self-development and improvement are advised.

Unacceptable. This The level of performance does not meet minimum expectations and requires urgent interventions intervention and support.  Rating 2support 0 – 75 0% - 49% 2 Acceptable: Satisfies minimum expectations. This The level of performance is acceptable and is in line with the minimum expectations, but development and support are still required.  Rating 3required 76 - 105 50% - 69% 3 Good: Good. Performance is good and meets expectations, but some areas are still in need of development and support.  Rating 4support 106 – 128 70% - 84% 4 Outstanding: Outstanding. Performance is outstanding and exceeds expectations. Although performance is excellentoutstanding, continuous self-self- development and improvement are advised.. 129 – 152 85% - 100%

Unacceptable. This level of performance does not meet minimum expectations and requires urgent interventions and support.  • Rating 2: Satisfies minimum expectations. This level of performance is acceptable and is in line with minimum expectations, but development and support are still required.  • Rating 3: Good. Performance is good and meets expectations, but some areas are still in need of development and support.  • Rating 4: Outstanding. Performance is outstanding and exceeds expectations. Although performance is excellent, continuous self-development and improvement are advised.

Unacceptable. This level of performance does not meet minimum expectations and requires urgent interventions and support.  • Rating 2: Satisfies minimum expectations. This level of performance is acceptable and is in line with minimum expectations, but development and support are still required.  • Rating 3: Good. Performance is good and meets expectations, but some areas are still in need of development and support.  • Rating 4: Outstanding. Performance is outstanding and exceeds expectations. Although performance is excellent, continuous self-self- development and improvement are advised.