Common use of The Recipient shall Clause in Contracts

The Recipient shall. Provide a ZNE Cost-effectiveness All Electric vs Dual-Fuel Report including but not limited to: o Discussion on the cost-effectiveness of All-Electric ZNE Home Versus Dual-Fuel Home o Discussion and results to assess avoided costs due to the elimination of natural gas infrastructure from the all-electric ZNE demonstration project, as well as other subcontractor developments throughout the State using cost data from adjacent phases in the same subdivision. • Provide a ZNE Cost-Benefit Analysis Report including but not limited to: o Discussion and results of work with the Homebuilder KB Home (KB) to acquire actual cost data to provide electricity service to the ZNE community, as well as Products: other Homebuilder KB developments located throughout the State. Include any increases or decreases in infrastructure costs related to the grid impact from renewable generation substantially exceeding load at certain times throughout the year. o Results from the integration of survey data from Task 2 and survey the homebuilder, the California Building Industry Association (CBIA), and other builders to assess market demand for/aversion to all-electric homes. o Results of using data from homes modeled in Task 3 as well as actual site usage data from the demonstration homes to assess the cost effectiveness of all- electric versus dual-fuel ZNE homes, after incorporation of infrastructure cost savings for all-electric homes (from a builder standpoint). o Results and analysis from the overlay of current and planned (i.e. time-of-use) electric and natural gas residential rate structures in at least five other California communities to determine actual consumer utility costs for all-electric and dual- fuel homes designed to meet the TDV-based definition of ZNE. o Results and analysis from the overlay of tiered, flat, and one or more time-of-use electric rate structure(s) on the annual modeled and actual hourly load curves for the demonstration homes to determine which rate structure results in the lowest cost to consumers. o Discussion on the integration of actual usage data acquired from circuit-level monitoring to update the prioritized list of energy efficiency features and packages developed in task 3. o Datasets from Utility Rate Structure Comparison in Excel format. • ZNE Cost-effectiveness All Electric vs Dual-Fuel Report • ZNE Cost-Benefit Analysis Report TASK 10: DEVELOP NOVEL FINANCING MECHANISMS AND OVERCOME POLICY BARRIERS TO USING DISTRIBUTED GENERATION

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Original Agreement, www.energy.ca.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

The Recipient shall. Provide a ZNE Cost-effectiveness All Electric vs Dual-Fuel Report including but not limited to: o Discussion on the cost-effectiveness of All-Electric ZNE Home Versus Dual-Fuel Home o Discussion and results to assess avoided costs due to the elimination of natural gas infrastructure from the all-electric ZNE demonstration project, as well as other subcontractor developments throughout the State using cost data from adjacent phases in the same subdivision. Provide a ZNE Cost-Benefit Analysis Report including but not limited to: o Discussion and results of work with the Homebuilder KB Home (KB) to acquire actual cost data to provide electricity service to the ZNE community, as well as Products: other Homebuilder KB developments located throughout the State. Include any increases or decreases in infrastructure costs related to the grid impact from renewable generation substantially exceeding load at certain times throughout the year. o Results from the integration of survey data from Task 2 and survey the homebuilder, the California Building Industry Association (CBIA), and other builders to assess market demand for/aversion to all-electric homes. o Results of using data from homes modeled in Task 3 as well as actual site usage data from the demonstration homes to assess the cost effectiveness of all- electric versus dual-fuel ZNE homes, after incorporation of infrastructure cost savings for all-electric homes (from a builder standpoint). o Results and analysis from the overlay of current and planned (i.e. time-of-use) electric and natural gas residential rate structures in at least five other California communities to determine actual consumer utility costs for all-electric and dual- fuel homes designed to meet the TDV-based definition of ZNE. o Results and analysis from the overlay of tiered, flat, and one or more time-of-use electric rate structure(s) on the annual modeled and actual hourly load curves for the demonstration homes to determine which rate structure results in the lowest cost to consumers. o Discussion on the integration of actual usage data acquired from circuit-level monitoring to update the prioritized list of energy efficiency features and packages developed in task 3. o Datasets from Utility Rate Structure Comparison in Excel format. • ZNE Cost-effectiveness All Electric vs Dual-Fuel Report • ZNE Cost-Benefit Analysis Report TASK 10: DEVELOP NOVEL FINANCING MECHANISMS AND OVERCOME POLICY BARRIERS TO USING DISTRIBUTED GENERATION.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.energy.ca.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

The Recipient shall. Provide a ZNE Cost-effectiveness All Electric vs Dual-Fuel Report including but not limited to: o Discussion on the cost-effectiveness of All-Electric ZNE Home Versus Dual-Fuel Home o Discussion and results to assess avoided costs due to the elimination of natural gas infrastructure from the all-electric ZNE demonstration project, as well as other subcontractor developments throughout the State using cost data from adjacent phases in the same subdivision. • Provide a ZNE Cost-Benefit Analysis Report including but not limited to: o Discussion and results of work with the Homebuilder KB Home (KB) to acquire actual cost data to provide electricity service to the ZNE community, as well as Products: other Homebuilder KB developments located throughout the State. Include any increases or decreases in infrastructure costs related to the grid impact from renewable generation substantially exceeding load at certain times throughout the year. o Results from the integration of survey data from Task 2 and survey the homebuilder, the California Building Industry Association (CBIA), and other builders to assess market demand for/aversion to all-electric homes. o Results of using data from homes modeled in Task 3 as well as actual site usage data from the demonstration homes to assess the cost effectiveness of all- electric versus dual-fuel ZNE homes, after incorporation of infrastructure cost savings for all-electric homes (from a builder standpoint). o Results and analysis from the overlay of current and planned (i.e. time-of-use) electric and natural gas residential rate structures in at least five other California communities to determine actual consumer utility costs for all-electric and dual- fuel homes designed to meet the TDV-based definition of ZNE. o Results and analysis from the overlay of tiered, flat, and one or more time-of-use electric rate structure(s) on the annual modeled and actual hourly load curves for the demonstration homes to determine which rate structure results in the lowest cost to consumers. o Discussion on the integration of actual usage data acquired from circuit-level monitoring to update the prioritized list of energy efficiency features and packages developed in task 3. o Datasets from Utility Rate Structure Comparison in Excel format. • ZNE Cost-effectiveness All Electric vs Dual-Fuel Report • ZNE Cost-Benefit Analysis Report TASK 10: DEVELOP NOVEL FINANCING MECHANISMS AND OVERCOME POLICY BARRIERS TO USING DISTRIBUTED GENERATION.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.energy.ca.gov

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.