The Patent Sample Clauses

The Patent. XXX Safety represents and warrants to Ironclad that, to the best of its knowledge, Attachment D constitutes a true and complete list of the manufacturers and catalogue styles of all gloves that it currently distributes, sells or offers for sale as of the date of the Agreement in Principle (the "Pipeline Gloves"). XXX Safety further represents and warrants to Ironclad that, to the best of its knowledge and other than certain non-engineered gloves made to specification for private label, all of the Pipeline Gloves are standard catalogue items of the respective manufacturers and that none of the Pipeline Gloves are specifically made as a “custom” style for distribution or sale by XXX Safety. Ironclad agrees that XXX Safety may continue to sell the Pipeline Gloves, irrespective of whether such Pipeline Gloves actually or allegedly infringe on the U.S. Patent No. 9,241,519 (filed Sept. 19, 2008) (the "Patent"). Further, Ironclad covenants not to xxx XXX Safety or its Affiliates (as defined below), or any of their respective directors, managers, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, representatives, successors or assigns, nor any customer or distributor with respect to those Pipeline Gloves purchased from XXX Safety, nor any of their respective directors, managers, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, representatives, successors or assigns (collectively, “Downstream Acquirors”), based on any alleged infringement of the Patent with as a result of the purchase or sale of any of the Pipeline Gloves. For the sake of clarity, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent Ironclad from suing any manufacturer, distributor or any other third party who distributes or sells any Pipeline Gloves to XXX Safety, and XXX Safety expressly agrees to cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to Ironclad in connection with any such suit. To the extent Ironclad reasonably believes XXX Safety is selling or distributing any gloves other than the Pipeline Gloves that allegedly infringe the Patent, Ironclad shall provide XXX Safety at least sixty (60) days’ prior written notice before Ironclad files any litigation alleging infringement of the Patent against XXX Safety or any party Ironclad actually knows to be a Downstream Acquiror. Said notice shall provide a description of the basis of Ironclad’s assertions in reasonable detail, and provide XXX Safety the opportunity to cure any alleged infringement or to discontinue selling (and/or cause any such Downstream Acquiror the opport...

The Patent. The invention in the P relates to an electronic cigarette and, in particular, to an aerosol electronic cigarette that contains nicotine but does not contain tar. The problems sought to be solved by the invention are not complicated and are expressed in these terms: [0006] The electronic cigarettes currently available on the market … are complicated in structure. Their cigarette bodies can be roughly divided into three sections, which have to be connected through via plugging or thread coupling before use. Also, their batteries have to be changed frequently, making it inconvenient for the users. What's worse, the electronic cigarettes don't provide the ideal aerosol effects, and their atomizing efficiency is not high. The P teaches a simple device to solve this problem and it seeks to provide good aerosol effects and atomising efficiency. The general configuration of the preferred embodiment of the P is shown in Figure 1. There are three main components: the battery assembly (3), the atomiser assembly (8, left part is coloured pink) and the liquid storage component (9, coloured yellow) in a shell (a, b). The liquid to be vaporised (for example, nicotine) is stored in the liquid storage component and this component is in liquid communication with the porous component of the atomiser assembly. When a person sucks on the device (at end b1) the pressure change causes the battery assembly to activate and provide power to the heating component in the atomiser assembly. This pressure change also causes air to flow into the device through air inlets (a1, coloured red) and towards the atomiser assembly where there is vaporisation of the liquid in the porous component by forced convection. The liquid lost by evaporation from the porous component is replaced by further liquid supplied by capillary flow from the liquid storage component. The vapour condenses within the shell to form an aerosol which is inhaled by the user. The aerosol is intended to simulate the smoke of a cigarette. The witnesses I heard expert evidence from Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Fontem and Xx Xxx on behalf of Xxxxxxxx. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx is an academic. He trained as a chemical engineer and since 2007 has been a Senior Lecturer, Reader and, since 2014, Professor in the Engineering and Environment Department at the University of Southampton. He was appointed a Fellow of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers in 2011. Xx Xxx is a consultant engineer. He gained a first class degree in Enginee...

The Patent