Testing and Quality Sample Clauses
The Testing and Quality clause establishes the standards and procedures for verifying that goods or services meet specified requirements before acceptance. It typically outlines the methods for conducting tests, the criteria for passing, and the responsibilities of each party in the testing process. By clearly defining how quality will be measured and enforced, this clause helps prevent disputes over product performance and ensures that deliverables meet agreed-upon expectations.
Testing and Quality. Boost Mobile Trusted Publishers shall self-test all Digital Items pursuant to the Boost Mobile Trusted Publisher Guide. Additionally, all Digital Items posted on a Distribution Channel may be subject to periodic and random testing by Nextel. Any Digital Item that fails such periodic and random testing, as determined by Nextel in its sole discretion, may immediately be disabled or removed from a Distribution Channel without notice. Boost Mobile may exercise its sole discretion and revoke Trusted Publisher certification for reasons including but not limited to three (3) Digital Items failing such periodic and random testing within any three (3) month period.
Testing and Quality. Aksys and Peak will establish testing procedures mutually agreed upon by Peak and Aksys. Peak will evaluate and incorporate Aksys test procedures into its PMQS. Aksys and Peak will agree on Non Recurring Engineering fees to compensate appropriate activities. Peak agrees that Aksys's representatives may have access to the area of Peak's facility where Products are being manufactured or stored or where parts and materials are being processed or stored at all times during normal business hours for purposes of quality inspection and verification of manufacturing procedures to Specifications.
Testing and Quality. SECTION 26.01. Supplier will perform a factory systems test in accordance with the following criteria:
(a) The term "system" is meant to describe a complete ASE transport system including all standard subsystems. For normal production, it is acceptable to test subsystems in a "system configuration" test environment consisting of a captive test bed to which the specific subsystem under test is connected. These arrangements are acceptable if the periodic qualification testing is used to revalidate such test configurations. This can be accomplished by first testing a defined system in the production manner followed by qualification testing of the same system (using a full system environment).
(b) Correction of any production testing program deficiencies identified will be made immediately. System configuration testing will be conducted on Materials to demonstrate the ability to achieve stable, fault free operation for a reasonable period of time while running operational exercises and diagnostic routines at 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The testing duration will be such that adherence to reliability requirements can be demonstrated. Manufacturing testing burn-in intervals will be of sufficient duration, so that when coupled with normal installation and turnover intervals, early-life reliability performance at cut over will be at or below two and one-half times the steady-state reliability level. That is, the instantaneous failure rate at cut over shall be less than or equal to two and one-half times the expected steady-state instantaneous failure rate.
(c) Periodically, an entire system will be subjected to qualification testing to assure that product and manufacturing processes continue to demonstrate conformance to design intent. All Material shipped loose and not in a complete system configuration, such as spares and additions for growth, shall receive testing to demonstrate functionality and quality levels at least equivalent to Material embedded in systems. Manufacturing testing and burn-in intervals will be of sufficient duration so that infant mortality failure rate of Material shipped is no greater than two and one-half times the predicted steady-state failure rate.
(d) Testing performed will provide verification of operability as completely as possible with current manufacturing test capabilities. This will include verification of performance over ranges of design limits to assure operation in all possible field applications. Testing in a simulated use env...
Testing and Quality. 8.1 MEDA shall allow Paradigm access to observe the manufacturing process of the products relevant to this Agreement. MEDA shall endeavor to implement measures, procedures and tests to meet the quality standards required by Paradigm, the TUV or FDA within one month of receiving written notification.
8.2 MEDA shall provide Paradigm with copies of all TUV Regulatory (CE) certificates. In addition, MEDA shall provide copies of all FDA 510(k) registration certificates when they are obtained from the FDA.
8.3 MEDA may engage Paradigm to assist in the FDA registration process of its products in the United States of America. When such FDA 510(k) registration is performed by Paradigm, all of the related testing results required for TUV CE certification shall be made available to Paradigm. Other required testing results performed by Paradigm shall be made available to MEDA. Cost of FDA 510(k) registration for MEDA Products shall be negotiated between MEDA and Paradigm on a per product basis.
8.4 Both Parties agree to immediately inform the other Party in the event that their ISO9001 & ISO13485 & MDD93/42/EEC certification accreditation status changes and both Parties shall provide to the other Party copies of the ISO9001 & ISO13485 & MDD93/42/EEC certificates.
8.5 Paradigm shall be authorized to visit the MEDA facility a minimum of two times each year. MEDA shall be authorized to visit the Paradigm facility a minimum of two times each
Testing and Quality. Aksys and Peak will establish mutually agreed testing procedures, which Peak will incorporate its manufacturing quality system.