{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"samples": [{"hash": "dhdioAZyWu5", "uri": "/contracts/dhdioAZyWu5#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract", "score": 34.6568892149, "published": true}, {"hash": "52mDY2pFccq", "uri": "/contracts/52mDY2pFccq#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract", "score": 29.0953207927, "published": true}, {"hash": "2m52sVVWqyj", "uri": "/contracts/2m52sVVWqyj#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract", "score": 26.1786447639, "published": true}], "snippet": "The Government will thoroughly review those proposals remaining after the initial evaluation to determine technical acceptability. The Government will review Technical Acceptability by reviewing information submitted as part of L.1.1.2, including a review of the offeror's proposed project manager to ensure that he or she is acceptable to the Government. The Government may also review past references provided as part of the Experience and Past Performance information as described in L.1.1.2", "size": 20, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-government", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 14]}, {"key": "initial-evaluation", "type": "definition", "offset": [74, 92]}, {"key": "to-determine", "type": "definition", "offset": [93, 105]}, {"key": "information-submitted", "type": "clause", "offset": [195, 216]}, {"key": "the-offeror", "type": "definition", "offset": [259, 270]}, {"key": "project-manager", "type": "definition", "offset": [282, 297]}, {"key": "to-ensure", "type": "clause", "offset": [298, 307]}, {"key": "past-performance-information", "type": "clause", "offset": [442, 470]}], "hash": "3aca840b085b3fa69fac480749e2152a", "id": 1}, {"samples": [{"hash": "fwfFIZR76M", "uri": "/contracts/fwfFIZR76M#technical-acceptability", "label": "Blanket Purchase Agreement", "score": 24.4031485284, "published": true}, {"hash": "44NTWiM9ez", "uri": "/contracts/44NTWiM9ez#technical-acceptability", "label": "Blanket Purchase Agreement", "score": 22.6550308008, "published": true}], "snippet": "Technical acceptability will include a review of past performance and experience as defined in Section 3, along with any technical information provided by the quoter with its quotation.", "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "review-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [39, 48]}, {"key": "past-performance", "type": "clause", "offset": [49, 65]}, {"key": "in-section-3", "type": "clause", "offset": [92, 104]}, {"key": "information-provided-by", "type": "clause", "offset": [131, 154]}], "hash": "bb87b0014d376190c093254b311774d4", "id": 4}, {"samples": [{"hash": "dIE1p16T53P", "uri": "/contracts/dIE1p16T53P#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract for Services", "score": 25.052019165, "published": true}, {"hash": "k1FHRkMWFNf", "uri": "/contracts/k1FHRkMWFNf#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract for Services", "score": 24.6030116359, "published": true}, {"hash": "gtHVe52FVEs", "uri": "/contracts/gtHVe52FVEs#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract for Services", "score": 24.4332648871, "published": true}], "snippet": "Initially, the City\u2019s capabilities and approaches evaluation team shall evaluate technical Proposals on a pass/fail basis, assigning ratings of \u201cAcceptable\u201d or \u201cUnacceptable\u201d. The Proposals shall be evaluated against the following factors and subfactors:", "size": 5, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-city", "type": "clause", "offset": [11, 19]}, {"key": "evaluation-team", "type": "clause", "offset": [50, 65]}, {"key": "technical-proposals", "type": "clause", "offset": [81, 100]}, {"key": "the-proposals", "type": "clause", "offset": [176, 189]}], "hash": "03357fcfd26c055c84d14b7f26fc5538", "id": 2}, {"samples": [{"hash": "lRyB3uhMItp", "uri": "/contracts/lRyB3uhMItp#technical-acceptability", "label": "License Agreement", "score": 35.2074296457, "published": true}, {"hash": "aj7kLD4EdZb", "uri": "/contracts/aj7kLD4EdZb#technical-acceptability", "label": "License Agreement", "score": 35.1797899644, "published": true}, {"hash": "lFdz2dtWWCE", "uri": "/contracts/lFdz2dtWWCE#technical-acceptability", "label": "License Agreement", "score": 33.7369713504, "published": true}], "snippet": "If, within 30 days after the Picture Masters are delivered to Licensee or access thereto is granted to Licensee, Licensee reasonably determines that any of the Picture Masters are not of acceptable technical quality for Pay- Per-View and Video-On-Demand exhibition, in accordance with the specifications set forth in Attachment E, as may be modified with Licensor\u2019s reasonable approval, then it shall so notify Licensor and promptly return such Picture Masters (if delivered to Licensee) and provide to Licensor a technical report, at Licensor\u2019s sole cost and expense. Upon receipt of such notice, Licensor shall promptly (and, in any case, within 15 days of receipt) deliver or grant access in the United States to Licensee technically acceptable (per such technical report) replacement Picture Masters.", "size": 4, "snippet_links": [{"key": "days-after", "type": "definition", "offset": [14, 24]}, {"key": "the-picture", "type": "definition", "offset": [25, 36]}, {"key": "to-licensee", "type": "definition", "offset": [59, 70]}, {"key": "granted-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [92, 102]}, {"key": "technical-quality", "type": "definition", "offset": [198, 215]}, {"key": "in-accordance-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [266, 284]}, {"key": "the-specifications", "type": "definition", "offset": [285, 303]}, {"key": "attachment-e", "type": "definition", "offset": [317, 329]}, {"key": "reasonable-approval", "type": "clause", "offset": [366, 385]}, {"key": "to-licensor", "type": "clause", "offset": [500, 511]}, {"key": "technical-report", "type": "definition", "offset": [514, 530]}, {"key": "cost-and-expense", "type": "clause", "offset": [551, 567]}, {"key": "upon-receipt-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [569, 584]}, {"key": "days-of-receipt", "type": "clause", "offset": [651, 666]}, {"key": "grant-access", "type": "clause", "offset": [679, 691]}, {"key": "in-the-united-states", "type": "clause", "offset": [692, 712]}, {"key": "technically-acceptable", "type": "clause", "offset": [725, 747]}], "hash": "cf9ebc21a267b3bbde01250d5a4a83f0", "id": 3}, {"samples": [{"hash": "1VrImf5lyjO", "uri": "/contracts/1VrImf5lyjO#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract", "score": 30.2632518912, "published": true}], "snippet": "Offers must meet or exceed the specifications in the solicitation and any subsequent amendments. The information as specified in the proposal submittal requirements will be evaluated to determine if the proposed supplies meet the technical requirements as specified in the solicitation document. Technical Acceptability will be evaluated according to the following ratings and criteria:", "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-specifications", "type": "definition", "offset": [27, 45]}, {"key": "the-solicitation", "type": "clause", "offset": [49, 65]}, {"key": "subsequent-amendments", "type": "clause", "offset": [74, 95]}, {"key": "the-information", "type": "clause", "offset": [97, 112]}, {"key": "as-specified", "type": "clause", "offset": [113, 125]}, {"key": "proposal-submittal-requirements", "type": "clause", "offset": [133, 164]}, {"key": "to-determine", "type": "definition", "offset": [183, 195]}, {"key": "the-proposed", "type": "clause", "offset": [199, 211]}, {"key": "technical-requirements", "type": "definition", "offset": [230, 252]}, {"key": "solicitation-document", "type": "definition", "offset": [273, 294]}, {"key": "according-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [338, 350]}], "hash": "4e6cb7b9ffb20d6643dd4d55f2c4f769", "id": 5}, {"samples": [{"hash": "zcWS6nOXOo", "uri": "/contracts/zcWS6nOXOo#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract", "score": 26.8945681011, "published": true}], "snippet": "The Technical Acceptability Information shall be submitted as Volume I.", "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-technical", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 13]}], "hash": "e55f6b1079279004b028ce0504641ab2", "id": 6}, {"samples": [{"hash": "kO93Ve2oApg", "uri": "/contracts/kO93Ve2oApg#technical-acceptability", "label": "Licensing Agreement", "score": 26.1704312115, "published": true}], "snippet": "Technical acceptability will include a review of licensing agreement as defined in Section I -VIII, along with any technical information provided by the offeror with its proposal/quotation.", "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "review-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [39, 48]}, {"key": "licensing-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [49, 68]}, {"key": "in-section-i", "type": "clause", "offset": [80, 92]}, {"key": "information-provided-by", "type": "clause", "offset": [125, 148]}, {"key": "the-offeror", "type": "definition", "offset": [149, 160]}], "hash": "d74002c2a54020342366ee96121786cc", "id": 7}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4j0EJ7r4XaM", "uri": "/contracts/4j0EJ7r4XaM#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract Terms and Conditions", "score": 30.9303087475, "published": true}], "snippet": "Technical acceptability is comprised of meeting the requirements as outlined in the solicitation, statement of work, and the adherence to the delivery schedule.", "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "comprised-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [27, 39]}, {"key": "the-requirements", "type": "clause", "offset": [48, 64]}, {"key": "the-solicitation", "type": "clause", "offset": [80, 96]}, {"key": "statement-of-work", "type": "clause", "offset": [98, 115]}, {"key": "delivery-schedule", "type": "definition", "offset": [142, 159]}], "hash": "4a4ae5a34f0eae13c2d14b5d218aaca7", "id": 8}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4j0EJ7r4XaM", "uri": "/contracts/4j0EJ7r4XaM#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract Terms and Conditions", "score": 30.9303087475, "published": true}], "snippet": "Offers will be evaluated for Technical Acceptability in order based on their total evaluated price, and only the lowest priced offer will be evaluated until it is determined the lowest priced offer does not meet technical acceptability criteria; at that point, the next lowest priced offer will be evaluated for technical acceptability. This process will continue until a technically acceptable offer is identified.", "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "based-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [62, 70]}, {"key": "total-evaluated-price", "type": "definition", "offset": [77, 98]}, {"key": "does-not-meet", "type": "definition", "offset": [198, 211]}, {"key": "acceptable-offer", "type": "definition", "offset": [384, 400]}], "hash": "e92cbc20bedb83f6f913052a2c2c87b0", "id": 9}, {"samples": [{"hash": "bNFsr8o8siX", "uri": "/contracts/bNFsr8o8siX#technical-acceptability", "label": "Contract Terms and Conditions", "score": 30.159386791, "published": true}], "snippet": "Offers will be evaluated for Technical Acceptability in order based on their total evaluated price, and only the lowest priced offer will be evaluated until it is determined the lowest priced offer does not meet technical acceptability criteria; at that point, the next lowest priced offer will be evaluated for technical acceptability. This process will continue until a technically acceptable offer is identified. USCIS intends to award a Firm Fixed Price contract, in accordance the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process. Best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price. Technical acceptability is comprised of meeting the requirements as outlined in the description of requirement or statement of work, and adherence to the delivery schedule in the solicitation. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of quotes meeting the Technical Acceptability for non-cost factors.", "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "based-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [62, 70]}, {"key": "total-evaluated-price", "type": "definition", "offset": [77, 98]}, {"key": "does-not-meet", "type": "definition", "offset": [198, 211]}, {"key": "acceptable-offer", "type": "definition", "offset": [384, 400]}, {"key": "firm-fixed-price-contract", "type": "definition", "offset": [441, 466]}, {"key": "in-accordance", "type": "definition", "offset": [468, 481]}, {"key": "lowest-price", "type": "clause", "offset": [486, 498]}, {"key": "selection-process", "type": "definition", "offset": [536, 553]}, {"key": "best-value", "type": "definition", "offset": [555, 565]}, {"key": "selection-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [593, 609]}, {"key": "comprised-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [699, 711]}, {"key": "the-requirements", "type": "clause", "offset": [720, 736]}, {"key": "description-of-requirement", "type": "clause", "offset": [756, 782]}, {"key": "statement-of-work", "type": "clause", "offset": [786, 803]}, {"key": "delivery-schedule", "type": "definition", "offset": [826, 843]}, {"key": "the-solicitation", "type": "clause", "offset": [847, 863]}, {"key": "basis-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [891, 899]}, {"key": "the-technical", "type": "clause", "offset": [945, 958]}, {"key": "for-non", "type": "clause", "offset": [973, 980]}, {"key": "cost-factors", "type": "clause", "offset": [981, 993]}], "hash": "82ea9a5a01f21189de2d12709b278677", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "CmASWmoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjwLEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2IiB0ZWNobmljYWwtYWNjZXB0YWJpbGl0eSMwMDAwMDAwYQyiAQJlbhgAIAA=", "clause": {"title": "Technical Acceptability", "parents": [["evaluation-of-proposals", "Evaluation of Proposals"], ["general", "General"], ["basis-for-award", "BASIS FOR AWARD"], ["library-fod-program", "Library FOD Program"], ["bundling-programs", "Bundling Programs"]], "children": [["technical-acceptability-evaluation-process", "Technical Acceptability Evaluation Process"], ["general-requirements", "General Requirements"], ["offerors-shall-include", "Offerors SHALL include"], ["technical-acceptability", "Technical Acceptability"], ["price", "Price"]], "size": 44, "id": "technical-acceptability", "related": [["study-population", "Study Population", "Study Population"], ["standards-for-determining-commercial-reasonableness", "Standards for Determining Commercial Reasonableness", "Standards for Determining Commercial Reasonableness"], ["elements-unsatisfactory-needs-improvement-proficient-exemplary", "Elements Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary", "Elements Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary"], ["constructability-review", "Constructability Review", "Constructability Review"], ["substance-abuse-testing", "Substance Abuse Testing", "Substance Abuse Testing"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-07T12:37:53+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}