TEACHERS' EVALUATIONS Sample Clauses

TEACHERS' EVALUATIONS. A. The Administration and the Rockaway Township Education Association, recognize that the evaluation procedure approved by the Instructional and Administrative Councils in June 1970, is an ongoing instrument that may be changed at any time by mutual consent of the Administration and of the Rockaway Township Education Association, subject to final approval by the Board of Education.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
TEACHERS' EVALUATIONS. At all times the action taken under the reduction-in-force policy will be consistent with North Dakota State Law and the provisions of this Negotiated Agreement. Teacher rights: Recall: First and primary offerings of contracts for all openings occurring in the system will be to Teachers under the terms of the Reduction-In-Force policy provided they are legally qualified. These contracts shall be offered in the reverse order of layoff and qualifications up until the first day of school. The Teacher who has been reduce-in-force will have two weeks in which to accept or reject their offered contract or will forfeit all the above rights.
TEACHERS' EVALUATIONS. The purpose of evaluations is to improve the quality of education for the pupils of the school district. Evaluations are to be used by the administration and teachers to improve the quality of instruction and may be used in the determination of advancement, promotion, transfers, assignments, and future employment. Within two weeks after the beginning of each school year, the principal shall acquaint the staff with the evaluation procedures, standards, and instruments. The principals shall advise the staff as to who will observe and evaluate teacher performance. No evaluation may be done until such orientation has been completed. First, second, and third year teachers shall be evaluated at least once each semester each year. Teachers in their fourth year of employment or beyond shall be evaluated at least once during the first semester of every other school year. The administration shall evaluate teachers more often if it is deemed necessary. All evaluations shall be done openly and shall be based solely upon first-hand observations made by the evaluator. The administrator shall evaluate each teacher in writing using an observation form and evaluation instrument approved by the board. A formal evaluation shall include at least one in-class observation. Those teachers who have been evaluated as "needs improvement" or unsatisfactory will have a plan of assistance consisting of goals, steps in achieving the goals, and a timeline for completing of goals. All staff shall have the opportunity for a post-supervisory conference. The entire evaluation will be reviewed at this time. Both parties shall have the opportunity to refute any decisions. A copy of the evaluation will then be given to the certified teacher and one will be filed in the superintendent’s office. The evaluation shall be signed by the evaluator and the teacher. The signature reflects the receipt of the evaluation and not necessarily an agreement to what is in the evaluation. All files on an employee shall be made known to the employee and no material may be placed in the file(s) without the employee's knowledge and the opportunity to have a demurral statement attached. All personnel files shall be strictly confidential and access to the file(s) shall be limited to the superintendent, appropriate principal and administrative staff, and any person designated by the employee. These files are subject to board and school attorney review at a duly authorized meeting, provided this item is on the agenda ...

Related to TEACHERS' EVALUATIONS

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 3. Any matter for which there is recourse under State or Federal statutes.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 11.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.