Systematic review. A review of electronic WIC transactions by the WIC state agency or its representatives to monitor retailer sales activity in order to determine potential program violations.
Systematic review. Self-evaluation In support of the findings in the meta-analysis, people with ED had more self-monitoring thoughts (d=.583) and spent longer when making self-referent judgements about emotional words in experimental tasks (d=.804) (Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx, 1991; Jänsch, Harmer, & Xxxxxx, 2009). Seven studies measured self-evaluation through self-report questionnaires. Individuals with ED had greater negative self-esteem (d=2.589), self-consciousness (d=1.56; d=1.69) and meta-cognitions (d=1.266) (Joiner, Schmidt, & Wonderlich, 1997; Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxx, 0000; Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx, Silberstein, & Xxxxx, 0000; Cooper, Grocutt, Deepak, & Xxxxxx, 2007). People with ED had a low perception of self- competence (d=.746), they engaged in more self-silencing behaviours (d=.959) with higher expression and anger toward self (d=.202) (Grisset & Xxxxxxx, 1992; Hambrook et al., 2011; Brytek- Matera, 2007). People with ED were similar to controls in their view of self-consciousness, in terms of both private (attend to inner thoughts and feelings) and public self (awareness of self as a social object) (d<.01).
Systematic review. Facial avoidance Adults (d=1.68) and adolescents (d=.70) with AN appear to show more facial avoidance than controls in response to emotional film clips (Davies et al., 2011; Rhind et al., submitted).
Systematic review. Understanding mental states
Systematic review. Social dominance Confirming the result from the meta-analysis, a single study using self-report showed that individuals with ED engaged in higher levels of social comparison than controls (d=1.50 - d=4.98) (Xxxxx, Xxxxx, Treasure, & Xxxxxxx, 2003). Study Measure Outcome Social Dominance SMD (95% CI) % Weight AN Xxxxxx et al. 2012 Troop et al. 2003a Subtotal IIP SBS IntProbs Submissive 0.19 (0.03, 0.36) 1.21 (0.81, 1.61) 0.69 (-0.31, 1.69) 7.78 7.17 14.95 BN Troop et al. 2003b Xxxxxx et al. 2000 Subtotal SBS YSQ Submissive Shame
Systematic review. The Systematic review is a method used for the large-scale and cross-disciplinary mapping of the literature on a specific area of knowledge avoiding the need for costly primary research and providing a transparent selection of information. To this end, the systematic review uses an agreed protocol comprehensive enough to identify all relevant literature but precise enough to minimise the amount of spurious references retrieved. The agreed protocol for the systematic review of literature used in the ROAMER project is detailed in section 5.1.
Systematic review. Affiliation and attachment Studies which could not be included in the meta-analysis are discussed below. The results from the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) showed that individuals with ED had less State of Mind (d=.14), coherence of transcript (d=2.37) and Probable Experience of Positive Attachment (d=1.34), but they had more Probable Experience of Negative Attachment (d=1.03) (Xxxx et al., 2001). People with ED were less likely to speak about interpersonal relationships, although the ES found was negligible (d=.07) (Xxxx, Nandrino, Xxxxx, Xxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2008). In other self-reports of attachment style, people with ED were found to show an increase in dysfunctional attachment (d=.37) and separation anxiety (d=.58- d=.66) (Xxxx et al., 2000; Xxxxxx et al., 2005). Those with ED showed lower levels of general attachment (d=.46 – d=1.12) (Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2009; Xxxxx & Xxxx, 1992). Individuals with ED showed a greater ability to distinguish attachment figures from other types of figures (d=.11) and better understood the provisions of attachment figures (d=.35) (Xxxx et al., 2000). The NIMH RDoC states that social anhedonia is an area of ‘Affiliation and Attachment’. Research in this areas shows that individuals with ED had higher levels of social anhedonia (d=1.48- 1.95) (Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, et al., 2012).
Systematic review. Agency In support of the findings from the meta-analysis, results from two self-report questionnaires and experimental tasks show that people with ED have an altered sense of agency. They have more symptoms of somatoform dissociation (d=.486– d=.942) (Xxxxxxxx et al., 2005). Their sensory sensitivity (d=0.963-d=1.075) and pressure detection threshold (d=.334) differ from controls (Xxxxxx et al., 2013; Xxxxxx et al., 2012). Individuals with ED report anomalies in their sensory profile, they are more avoidant of sensation (d=1.007-d=1.086) and seek sensation less (d=0.254-d=0.317) (Xxxxxx et al., 2013). Two studies measured interpretations of dynamic body dimensions in experimental tasks. People with ED showed higher ‘actual’ (d=.54 - d=.16) and ‘felt’ BMI (d=.39 - d=.88). Also people with ED reported that an ‘ideal’ BMI would be approximately 20 (d=.04 - d=.74) (Legenbauer et al., 2011; Xxxxx, Legenbauer, Xxxxxx, & Xxxxx, 2007).
Systematic review. ISO/IEEE standards that have been published for four years since their last approval date will be reviewed in their entirety by the responsible IEEE subcommittee and the responsible ISO TC/SC and a decision shall be made by both parties whether to confirm, revise, or withdraw the standard. Such action shall be initiated within five years of the last approval date. Annex B Publication, copyright and commercial arrangements B1 Normative referencing of standards (Clause 2 of the Agreement)
Systematic review
