SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS Sample Clauses

SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS. Detailed test data reviews shall be held during the conduct of the system level test program, with participation by System Test, System Engineering, and XM representatives. The purpose of these reviews shall be to assure test data validity in a near real-time manner. There shall be pre-test and post-test reviews for each of the following test phases: [***] XM PROPRIETARY EXHIBIT B REV B 25 OF 88 ***** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. [***] The pre-test reviews shall be held prior to each major test phase. These reviews shall verify test readiness. The post-test phase reviews shall be held immediately at the completion of each major test. These reviews, conducted by Systems Engineering and Systems Test, will include a brief data overview, an anomaly list including cause and corrective action status, and open issues, if appropriate. The test phase review shall serve to assure that the appropriate [***] has been completed and that spacecraft status is understood prior to leaving a test facility or major configuration.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS. 25 3.3.3 SHIPMENT READINESS REVIEW (SRR)...................................26 3.3.4 FLIGHT READINESS REVIEWS (FRR)....................................26 3.3.5 LAUNCH READINESS REVIEWS (LRR)....................................26 3.3.6 IN-ORBIT ACCEPTANCE TEST REVIEW (IOTR)............................27 3.3.7 MRR, TRR, AND TRB PARTICIPATION...................................27 3.4 ANALYSES.................................................................27 3.4.1 GENERAL DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSES REQUIREMENTS..............27 3.4.2 [****] ANALYSIS...................................................28 3.4.3 [****] ANALYSIS...................................................28 3.4.4 [****] ANALYSIS...................................................28 3.4.5 [****] ANALYSIS...................................................28 3.4.6 [****] ANALYSIS...................................................28 ***** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
Sample 1
SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS. Detailed test data reviews shall be held during the conduct of the system level test program, with participation by System Test, System Engineering, and XM representatives. The purpose of these reviews shall be to assure test data validity in a near real-time manner. There shall be pre-test and post-test reviews for each of the following test phases : [****]. ***** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. The pre-test reviews shall be held prior to each major test phase. These reviews shall verify test readiness. The post-test phase reviews shall be held immediately at the completion of each major test These reviews, conducted by Systems Engineering and Systems Test, will include a brief data overview, an anomaly list including cause and corrective action status, and open issues, if appropriate. The test phase review shall serve to assure that the appropriate [****] has been completed and that spacecraft status is understood prior to leaving a test facility or major configuration.
Sample 1
SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS. Detailed test data reviews shall be held during the conduct of the system level test program, with participation by System Test, System Engineering, and XM ***** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
Sample 1

Related to SYSTEM TEST REVIEWS

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Design Review Consumer shall provide Holy Cross an electrical one-line diagram and a relaying and metering one-line diagram prior to completion of detailed designs, unless the Consumer is installing a packaged system that is pre-certified to IEEE 1547.1 and UL 1741 standards. Packaged systems pre-certified under IEEE Standard 1547.1 and UL Standard 1741 will not require a relaying and metering one-line diagram. The submitted application and diagrams will be processed, reviewed, and acted upon in accordance with the Holy Cross Interconnection Policy.

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.