Suriname Sample Clauses

Suriname. Dr. Guillermo Troya, Burenstraat #33, (P.O. Box 1863), Paramaribo, Suriname, phone (597) 471–676 / 425–355, fax 471–568, e-mail: email@sur.paho.org.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Suriname. Nation, territory Witnessed
Suriname. Dr. Stephen Simon, Burenstraat #33 (PPS Building), P.O. Box 1863, Paramaribo, Suriname, phone (597) 471–676 / 425–355, fax 471–568, e-mail: email@sur.paho.org.
Suriname. See In the Matter of an Arbitration between Guyana and Suriname Philippines v. China. See South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v. China) provisional measures in. See provisional measures Arbitration Agreement between Croatia and Slovenia, 58–60 Arbitration between Barbados and Republic of Trinidad and Tobago baselines in, 323 conduct of parties in, 258 delimitation beyond 200 nautical miles in, 327, 352 equitable considerations in, 164 equitable solution in, 159, 166 equity in, 145 equity infra legem in, 156, 157–158 geographical circumstances in, 282, 287 jurisdiction ratione materiae of the ITLOS, 332 LOSC’s Article 281 and, 15–17 predictability of case law in, 384, 395 proportionality test in, 171, 302–303 provisional equidistance line in, 101 relevant circumstances, 169, 227, 245 relevant coasts/relevant area, 177, 181, 185 resource-related factors in, 253, 255–256 strict equidistance in, 390 archipelago, 208, 295–296 Xxxxxxxxxx, S., 275 Australia, 265 Bahrain, 6, 7, 35, 41–42, 43, 47, 48–49, 51–52, 57, 58, 65, 100, 207–208, 210, 216, 298–299, 384, 390 Bangladesh, 6, 11, 18, 46, 50–51, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 66, 67–68, 70, 81, 82, 83–84, 85, 86–87, 88, 104, 108, 111, 112, 159–160, 162, 163, 165, 170, 179, 185, 189–190, 205, 209, 210–211, 218, 219, 227, 228, 235, 238–242, 243, 244, 249, 251, 255, 263, 271, 280–281, 283, 286–287, 288, 309–312, 320–323, 324, 330–336, 341–343, 352–354, 358–361, 383, 386, 390, 394, 398–399
Suriname. See In the Matter of an Arbitration between Guyana and Suriname Hammourabi Code, 146 Hawar Islands, 298–299 historic title, 46 historic waters, 46–47 Honduras, 46–47, 49–50, 53, 54–55, 57, 58, 66, 80–81, 83–84, 100–102, 106, 128, 159, 161, 165, 167–168, 179–180, 193, 194, 196, 209, 237, 255, 265, 268, 269, 272, 273–274, 280, 281, 283, 300, 327–329, 387, 393 Honduras/Colombia Treaty (1986), 282 hydrocarbons, 395–396 Iceland, 132 Icelandic Fisheries case, 132 In the Matter of an Arbitration between Guyana and Suriname, 45, 118 compulsory dispute settlement in, 141–142 consistency of case law in, 385 enforcing requirements in future litigation, 124–127 entitlements in, recognition of, 267 equitable considerations in, 161, 163 equitable solution in, 166, 167 judicial interpretation in, 120–124 military activities in, 126 provisional arrangements in, 128 provisional measures in, 136, 140 relevant coastline in, 303 relevant coasts/relevant area, 179–180, 185, 191–192, 194 seabed activities in, 137 special circumstances in, 54 strict equidistance in, 390 In the Matter of the Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Netherlands v. Russia), 14 In the Matter of the Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration (Bangladesh v. India), 55, 57, 60, 108 applicable law, 104 award in, 398–399 basepoints, 000 xxx-xxx xxxxx xx, 000 delimitation beyond 200 nautical miles in, 341–343, 353–354 delimitation methodology in, 361–364, 367, 368, 369–370 422 index In the Matter of the Bay (cont.) delineation vs. delimitation in, 341–342 disproportionality test in, 311–312 entitlements in, 86–87, 88, 271, 342–343, 354 equidistance in, 54 equitable considerations in, 163 geographical relationship between coastlines in, 249 grey zones, 364, 366 jurisdiction ratione materiae in, 341 land dominates the sea principle in, 66 natural prolongation in, 251 provisional equidistance line in, 82, 205, 210–211, 219 relevant circumstances, 228, 238–241, 242, 243 relevant circumstances in, 170, 368–369 relevant coasts/relevant area, 179, 189–190 territorial sea delimitation in, 51 Xxxxx, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00–87, 88, 104, 108, 112, 163, 170, 179, 189–190, 205, 210–211, 219, 228, 238–241, 242, 243, 249, 251, 254, 271, 287, 288, 311–312, 341–343, 353–354, 398–399 Institut de droit international, 146 insular features, 84–86 inter fauces terrae doctrine, 63–64 Interhandl Case (Switzerland v. US), 130 internal waters, 35–36, 46–47, 000 Xxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx of Justice (ICJ), 2–3, 12–13, 18–19, 47, 128, 129, 263 ...
Suriname. Information/data collected and human capacity building during the successful implementation of the regional ACTO Project: "Forest cover monitoring in the Amazon region is being used to implement this Project."
Suriname. The objectives of this Project are complementary and supportive of national policies, such as: • Promote sustainable forest management, combat illegal forest use and combat illegal trade in forest products, including "CITES species". • Strengthening, albeit simplified, including automation, of export procedures and monitoring. Configuration of an Electronic Single Window System for Exports • Improved transparency, data collection and management, and data/information dissemination. Assumptions for the achievement of the Results
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Suriname. For the forestry sector, in particular for Sustainable Forest Management (regarding logging monitoring), the Suriname Sustainable Forestry Information System (SFISS), among others, has been developed to ensure traceability (origin of records) and minimize illegal logging and export. This project will strengthen/update the SFISS.
Suriname. On November 25, 1975 Suriname became an independent state. In a note dated November 29, 1975 to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the Prime Minister made a statement reading in part as follows: ‘‘The Government of the Republic of Surinam, conscious of the desirability of maintaining ex- isting legal relationship, and conscious of its obligation under International Law to honour its treaty commitments, acknowledges that treaty rights and obligations of the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in respect of Surinam were succeeded by the Republic of Surinam upon Independence by virtue of cus- tomary International Law. ‘‘Since, however, it is likely that by virtue of customary International Law certain treaties may have lapsed at the date of Independence of Surinam, it seems essential that each treaty should be subjected to legal examination. It is proposed after this examination has been com- pleted, to indicate which, if any, of the treaties which may have lapsed by customary Inter- national Law the Government of the Republic of Surinam wish to treat as having lapsed. ‘‘It is desired that it be presumed that each treaty has been legally succeeded to by the Re- public of Surinam and that action be based upon this presumption until a decision is reached that it should be regarded as having lapsed. Should the Government of the Republic of Surinam be of the opinion it has legally succeeded to a treaty but subsequently wish to terminate its operation, the Government will in due course give notice of termination in the terms thereof.’’ AVIATION Agreement between the United States and the Netherlands providing for nonassertion of sov- ereign immunity from suit of air transport en- terprises. Exchange of notes at Washington June 19, 1953; entered into force June 19,
Suriname. 19950203 Joint Communique on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations. Swaziland 19950810 Agreement in respect of cooperation and Mutual Assistance in the field of Crime Combating. 20040123 Entry into force:20050208 Agreement for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income. (GG 27637 dd 1.6.2005) 20041220 Entry into force:20041220 Agreement on the Establishment of a Joint Bilateral Commission for Cooperation. Sweden 19941128 Memorandum of Understanding on South African - Swedish Development cooperation. 19950524 Entry into force:19951225 Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income. (GG16890 dd 27.12.95) 19961001 Entry into force:19961001 Specific Agreement regarding the Establishment of a Rapid Response Fund (RRF). 19961016 Specific Agreement on Institutional Cooperation between the Central Statistical Service, and Statistics Sweden for the period May 1996 - December 1998. 19961017 Entry into force:19961017 Agreement on General Terms and Conditions for Development Co-operation. 19970218 Entry into force:19970218 Agreement on Development Co-operation from 1997 to1998. 19970218 Entry into force:19970218 Specific Agreement on the Women's Empowerment Unit for the National and Provincial Parliaments of South Africa. 19970519 Entry into force:19970519 Agreement concerning Development Co-operation in the Field of Urban Development and Housing. 19980525 Agreement on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments. 19981106 Entry into force:19981106 Specific Agreement on Support to the Office on the Status of Disabled Persons. 19981119 Entry into force:19981119 Specific Agreement regarding the Establishment of a Bridging Fund. 19981211 Entry into force:19981211 Specific Agreement on Education Sector Support to the National Department of Education. 19981211 Entry into force:19981211 Specific Agreement on Education Support to the Department of Education in the Northern Cape. 19990212 Entry into force:19990202 Agreement on Development Co-operation for the Period 1 January1999 - 31 December 2001. 19990224 Entry into force:19990224 Specific Agreement on Support to the Provincial Administration of the Eastern Cape for the period 1 July 1998 to 30 September 1999. 19990521 Entry into force:19990521 Specific Agreement regarding the Establishment of the Swedish South African Business Partnership Fund. 19990702 Entry into force:19990702 Sp...
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.