SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION Sample Clauses

SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION. 5.1 The following is a list of substantive issues that the Parties intend to address during the negotiation of an Agreement-in-Principle. It is not intended to be exhaustive and other subject matters may be addressed at the table by agreement of the Chief Negotiators:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION. 5.1 The Parties are committed to negotiating the following substantive issues with the intention of concluding an Agreement-in-Principle. This list of issues is not intended to be exhaustive or restrictive and each of the Parties may raise a broad range of topics for negotiation under each issue.
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION. 5.1. The following is a list of the substantive issues that the Parties intend to address during Agreement- in-Principle negotiations. The list below is not intended to be exhaustive and each of the Parties may raise a broad range of components for negotiation under each substantive issue. Other substantive issues may be addressed at the table by agreement of the Chief Negotiators:
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION. 5.1 The Parties acknowledge, in accordance with Recommendation No. 2 of the Task Force Report that each of the Parties is at liberty to introduce any issue at the negotiation table.
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION. 5.1 The following is a list of the broad substantive issues that the Parties intend to address during Agreement-in-Principle negotiations. For the Nuu-chah-nulth, these issues find their origin in the Ha-hoolthe of the Nuu-chah-nulth Ha'wiih. The list is not intended to be exhaustive and issues may be added or amended by agreement in writing of the Chief Negotiators:
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION. 5.1 The Parties are committed to negotiate the following substantive issues with the intention of concluding an Agreement in Principle: - Airspace - Amendment Procedures - Approval and Ratification Procedures - Certainty - Culture and Language - Dispute Resolution Process - Economic Development - Eligibility and Enrolment - Environmental Issues - Fiscal arrangements, Royalty sharing and Taxation - Governance - Heritage, including: - Archaeological sites - Gravesites - Culturally and spiritually significant sites - Place names - Cultural property - Land Base of Haisla Nation, including: - Selection - Retention - Quantum - Tenure - Access - Land Use Planning and Land Management - Parks and Protected Areas - Natural Resources, including: - Ownership, use, and management of renewable and non- renewable resources - Fish and Wildlife harvesting and management - Forestry resources - Marine resources - Traplines - Subsurface ownership and management - Water rights and water management - Third Party and Public Interests
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION. 5.1 A list of the subjects which the Parties intend to address in the negotiations is set out below: ● Jurisdiction ● Governance ● Lands including parks, protected areas, and land use planningLand selection and TenureNatural Resources including water, forests, fish, sub-surface, and wildlife ● Environmental issuesResource revenuesEligibility and enrolmentApproval and RatificationEconomic developmentCulture and Heritage ● Access ● Taxation ● Financial component of the settlementFiscal ArrangementsDispute resolutionThird party and Public interests ● Certainty ● Implementation ● Amendment proceduresIntergovernmental relations
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION. 5.1 The following is a listing of substantive issues that the Parties intend to address during the negotiation of an Agreement-in-Principle The list is not intended to be restrictive and may be added to by agreement in writing of the Chief Negotiators. ● Access ● Amendment procedures ● Certainty and finality ● Culture and heritageDispute resolution ● Eligibility ● Environmental assessment, protection, management and review procedures ● Financial component of settlement ● Fish and wildlife harvesting- and management ● Institutions, authorities, financing and taxation powers of Sechelt government ● Implementation ● Land use planning and land management ● Expansion of land base of Sechelt ● Criteria for future land acquisition as Sechelt lands within the meaning of the Sechelt Indian Band Self-Government Act, B.C. 1986, c-27 ● Natural resources management and allocation ● Overlapping claimsParks and protected areas ● Ratification ● Relationship of the Sechelt government to provincial and federal government ● Resource revenue sharing ● Subsurface ownership ● Third party and public interests ● Water management

Related to SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR NEGOTIATION

  • Grantee’s Notification of Change of Contact Person or Key Personnel The Grantee shall notify in writing their contract manager assigned within ten days of any change to the Grantee's Contact Person or Key Personnel.

  • GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND SECTOR SPECIFIC ALLOWANCES, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant: Where the company does work which falls under the following headings, the company agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • Selection of Reviewing Party; Change in Control If there has not been a Change in Control, any Reviewing Party shall be selected by the Board of Directors, and if there has been such a Change in Control (other than a Change in Control which has been approved by a majority of the Company's Board of Directors who were directors immediately prior to such Change in Control), any Reviewing Party with respect to all matters thereafter arising concerning the rights of Indemnitee to indemnification of Expenses under this Agreement or any other agreement or under the Company's Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws as now or hereafter in effect, or under any other applicable law, if desired by Indemnitee, shall be Independent Legal Counsel selected by Indemnitee and approved by the Company (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld). Such counsel, among other things, shall render its written opinion to the Company and Indemnitee as to whether and to what extent Indemnitee would be entitled to be indemnified hereunder under applicable law and the Company agrees to abide by such opinion. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees of the Independent Legal Counsel referred to above and to indemnify fully such counsel against any and all expenses (including attorneys' fees), claims, liabilities and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its engagement pursuant hereto. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Company shall not be required to pay Expenses of more than one Independent Legal Counsel in connection with all matters concerning a single Indemnitee, and such Independent Legal Counsel shall be the Independent Legal Counsel for any or all other Indemnitees unless (i) the employment of separate counsel by one or more Indemnitees has been previously authorized by the Company in writing, or (ii) an Indemnitee shall have provided to the Company a written statement that such Indemnitee has reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between such Indemnitee and the other Indemnitees with respect to the matters arising under this Agreement.

  • Publicly Known Without Breach Such information becomes known to the general public without a breach of this Agreement or a similar confidential disclosure agreement regarding such information;

  • Counterparts; Severability; Section References This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Any provisions of this Agreement which are prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction. Unless otherwise expressly indicated, all references herein to “Article,” “Section,” “Schedule” or “Exhibit” shall mean articles and sections of, and schedules and exhibits to, this Agreement.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both parties to this agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Reportable Events Involving the Xxxxx Law Notwithstanding the reporting requirements outlined above, any Reportable Event that involves solely a probable violation of section 1877 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §1395nn (the Xxxxx Law) should be submitted by Practitioner to CMS through the self-referral disclosure protocol (SRDP), with a copy to the OIG. If Practitioner identifies a probable violation of the Xxxxx Law and repays the applicable Overpayment directly to the CMS contractor, then Practitioner is not required by this Section III.G to submit the Reportable Event to CMS through the SRDP.

  • Private Letter Ruling or Change or Clarification of Law At Interconnection Customer’s request and expense, Transmission Owner shall file with the IRS a request for a private letter ruling as to whether any property transferred or sums paid, or to be paid, by Interconnection Customer to Transmission Owner under this GIA are subject to federal income taxation. Interconnection Customer will prepare the initial draft of the request for a private letter ruling, and will certify under penalties of perjury that all facts represented in such request are true and accurate to the best of Interconnection Customer’s knowledge. Transmission Owner and Interconnection Customer shall cooperate in good faith with respect to the submission of such request. Transmission Owner shall keep Interconnection Customer fully informed of the status of such request for a private letter ruling and shall execute either a privacy act waiver or a limited power of attorney, in a form acceptable to the IRS, that authorizes Interconnection Customer to participate in all discussions with the IRS regarding such request for a private letter ruling. Transmission Owner shall allow Interconnection Customer to attend all meetings with IRS officials about the request and shall permit Interconnection Customer to prepare the initial drafts of any follow-up letters in connection with the request.

  • Indemnitee Rights on Unfavorable Determination; Binding Effect If any Reviewing Party determines that Indemnitee substantively is not entitled to be indemnified hereunder in whole or in part under applicable law, Indemnitee shall have the right to commence litigation seeking an initial determination by the court or challenging any such determination by such Reviewing Party or any aspect thereof, including the legal or factual bases therefor, and, subject to the provisions of Section 15, the Company hereby consents to service of process and to appear in any such proceeding. Absent such litigation, any determination by any Reviewing Party shall be conclusive and binding on the Company and Indemnitee.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.