{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"samples": [{"hash": "eONc5mDalvI", "uri": "/contracts/eONc5mDalvI#study-area", "label": "Special Protection System Engineering, Construction and Implementation Agreement", "score": 33.7314966153, "published": true}, {"hash": "2EqkR2Z7J9", "uri": "/contracts/2EqkR2Z7J9#study-area", "label": "Special Protection System Engineering, Construction and Implementation Agreement", "score": 33.7178097774, "published": true}, {"hash": "3seUUB1XQFY", "uri": "/contracts/3seUUB1XQFY#study-area", "label": "Special Protection System Engineering, Construction and Implementation Agreement", "score": 26.7535934292, "published": true}], "size": 7, "snippet": "The study area focused on the Bulk Power System in South-Eastern New York between Albany and New York City, and voltages underlying systems at 115 kV and above in the lower \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Valley (Zones G, H & I). In the PSS\u2122E power flow base case provided by NYISO, facilities rated at 115 kV and above in PSS\u2122E designated areas 6 through 11 are monitored in the study. These areas are: \u2022 Capital District \u2022 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2022 Millwood \u2022 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2022 Con Ed \u2022 Long Island", "snippet_links": [{"key": "bulk-power-system", "type": "definition", "offset": [30, 47]}, {"key": "new-york-city", "type": "clause", "offset": [93, 106]}, {"key": "underlying-systems", "type": "definition", "offset": [121, 139]}, {"key": "power-flow", "type": "clause", "offset": [218, 228]}, {"key": "base-case", "type": "clause", "offset": [229, 238]}, {"key": "designated-areas", "type": "definition", "offset": [304, 320]}, {"key": "in-the-study", "type": "clause", "offset": [348, 360]}, {"key": "con-ed", "type": "definition", "offset": [432, 438]}], "hash": "09435f1887bf20ad8e531e860010a2a5", "id": 1}, {"samples": [{"hash": "fFz4WxU1Fyb", "uri": "/contracts/fFz4WxU1Fyb#study-area", "label": "On Call Supplemental Agreement", "score": 20.2361396304, "published": true}, {"hash": "fl6TJZmPYdw", "uri": "/contracts/fl6TJZmPYdw#study-area", "label": "On Call Supplemental Agreement", "score": 20.2265571526, "published": true}, {"hash": "5pb4bdIWN7Q", "uri": "/contracts/5pb4bdIWN7Q#study-area", "label": "On Call Supplemental Agreement", "score": 20.2073921971, "published": true}], "size": 3, "snippet": "The project area for the Ninth Street parking study is as shown in the attached map.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-project-area", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 16]}, {"key": "as-shown", "type": "definition", "offset": [55, 63]}], "hash": "f844148a7d54433a2c65047058edee02", "id": 2}, {"samples": [{"hash": "8b7Zzg92VXs", "uri": "/contracts/8b7Zzg92VXs#study-area", "label": "Reclamation Agreement", "score": 19.8829568789, "published": true}, {"hash": "7NgynmuJn1l", "uri": "/contracts/7NgynmuJn1l#study-area", "label": "Reclamation Agreement", "score": 18.417522245, "published": true}, {"hash": "6zq2UBimahJ", "uri": "/contracts/6zq2UBimahJ#study-area", "label": "Reclamation Agreement", "score": 17.7987679671, "published": true}], "size": 3, "snippet": "The Upper Colorado River basin in Utah, including the Green River and its tributaries.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "upper-colorado-river-basin", "type": "definition", "offset": [4, 30]}, {"key": "in-utah", "type": "clause", "offset": [31, 38]}, {"key": "green-river", "type": "clause", "offset": [54, 65]}], "hash": "854ba1ac97f9d708d6562d69f0771056", "id": 3}, {"samples": [{"hash": "8qXZueZpO08", "uri": "/contracts/8qXZueZpO08#study-area", "label": "Project Cooperation Agreement (Pca)", "score": 19.0848733744, "published": true}, {"hash": "irCSwJo5p5P", "uri": "/contracts/irCSwJo5p5P#study-area", "label": "Project Cooperation Agreement (Pca)", "score": 18.6358658453, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet": "\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Bay is a 106-acre shallow estuarine embayment of the New River within the city of Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "new-river", "type": "definition", "offset": [60, 69]}, {"key": "city-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [81, 88]}, {"key": "north-carolina", "type": "definition", "offset": [118, 132]}], "hash": "49b618d07720070d8d9339e54527e9f4", "id": 4}, {"samples": [{"hash": "M6vw6yXBrE", "uri": "/contracts/M6vw6yXBrE#study-area", "label": "Professional Services Contract", "score": 29.5717135945, "published": true}, {"hash": "hirjIt1sj5u", "uri": "/contracts/hirjIt1sj5u#study-area", "label": "Professional Services Contract", "score": 29.0132906082, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet": "The study area is generally the portion of \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Street from UTA Boulevard on the north to \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Road on the south in Arlington, Texas.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-study", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 9]}, {"key": "generally-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [18, 31]}, {"key": "on-the-north", "type": "definition", "offset": [76, 88]}, {"key": "on-the-south", "type": "clause", "offset": [104, 116]}], "hash": "e9b9cd8745cb8e165b628463970e9727", "id": 5}, {"samples": [{"hash": "j89uZ3PYKrh", "uri": "/contracts/j89uZ3PYKrh#study-area", "label": "Service Level Agreement", "score": 23.8158795346, "published": true}, {"hash": "bmMNrScQZs8", "uri": "/contracts/bmMNrScQZs8#study-area", "label": "Service Level Agreement", "score": 23.8158795346, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet": "The service provider will provide a quiet study area that is conducive for students to study away from their rooms.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "provide-a", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 35]}, {"key": "for-students", "type": "clause", "offset": [71, 83]}, {"key": "study-away", "type": "definition", "offset": [87, 97]}], "hash": "78ecf1ce50628d8a3c6209bc1356672a", "id": 6}, {"samples": [{"hash": "eXG25jTTqR4", "uri": "/contracts/eXG25jTTqR4#study-area", "label": "NCCP Local Assistance Grant", "score": 19.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "a5PaqYsREDI", "uri": "/contracts/a5PaqYsREDI#study-area", "label": "NCCP Local Assistance Grant", "score": 19.0, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet": "The lands in the total amended study area, from north to south are open space areas in Santa Fe Valley, County-owned portions of \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Creek, open space areas conveyed to the County of San Diego in 4S Ranch, San \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Open Space Preserve, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Mountain preserve lands, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Canyon Ecological Reserve and portions of Rancho Jamul, and lands north and south of the eastern arm of Otay Lakes. The following is a brief description of each study area. The Lake Hodges Segment surveyed included preserve lands in Santa Fe Valley, 4S Ranch, and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Creek. The County of San Diego and The Environmental Trust own the Santa Fe Valley preserve areas. The County of San Diego is also in ownership of the four parcels that comprise the approximately 200-acre \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Creek open space preserve. Lands in 4S Ranch that are identified as future open space according to the specific plan maps are being dedicated to the County of San Diego as final maps are recorded in the planning approval process. At the time of the field surveys the County of San Diego had access to the open space areas in the southern portion of 4S Ranch where \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Creek crosses through the preserve.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-lands", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 9]}, {"key": "the-total", "type": "clause", "offset": [13, 22]}, {"key": "open-space-areas", "type": "definition", "offset": [67, 83]}, {"key": "santa-fe", "type": "definition", "offset": [87, 95]}, {"key": "county-of-san-diego", "type": "clause", "offset": [177, 196]}, {"key": "description-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [428, 442]}, {"key": "environmental-trust", "type": "definition", "offset": [598, 617]}, {"key": "ownership-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [693, 709]}, {"key": "according-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [858, 870]}, {"key": "specific-plan", "type": "clause", "offset": [875, 888]}, {"key": "approval-process", "type": "clause", "offset": [984, 1000]}, {"key": "field-surveys", "type": "clause", "offset": [1021, 1034]}, {"key": "the-open", "type": "clause", "offset": [1073, 1081]}, {"key": "southern-portion", "type": "definition", "offset": [1101, 1117]}, {"key": "where-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [1130, 1137]}], "hash": "17db96e50bc8c164feed8f563966419d", "id": 7}, {"samples": [{"hash": "hLRELCjpHZK", "uri": "/contracts/hLRELCjpHZK#study-area", "label": "Recovery Program Agreement", "score": 24.0143737166, "published": true}, {"hash": "6mWGpe1QLFb", "uri": "/contracts/6mWGpe1QLFb#study-area", "label": "Recovery Program Agreement", "score": 24.0143737166, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet": "The study area for this project includes identified Colorado pikeminnow nursery habitat areas in the Green and Colorado rivers in Utah (\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 et al. 1982; \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 et al. 1985; \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 1991). Specifically, Split Mountain to Sand Wash (RM 319\u2013RM 215) on the middle Green River, Green River State Park to the confluence with the Colorado River (RM 120\u2013RM 0) on the lower Green River, and Cisco to the confluence with the Green River (RM 111\u2013RM 0) on the Colorado River.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-study", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 9]}, {"key": "in-utah", "type": "clause", "offset": [127, 134]}, {"key": "green-river", "type": "clause", "offset": [271, 282]}, {"key": "state-park", "type": "definition", "offset": [296, 306]}, {"key": "colorado-river", "type": "clause", "offset": [334, 348]}], "hash": "33a199155bc7f9b0b4fb096443d82092", "id": 8}, {"samples": [{"hash": "h9av56ack6O", "uri": "/contracts/h9av56ack6O#study-area", "label": "Recovery Program Agreement", "score": 28.6136349415, "published": true}, {"hash": "lA53GTgpCPZ", "uri": "/contracts/lA53GTgpCPZ#study-area", "label": "Recovery Program Agreement", "score": 23.8076659822, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet": "The Colorado River from Palisade, CO downstream to near Fruita, CO. Study Methods/Approach: FY 2020-2021", "snippet_links": [{"key": "colorado-river", "type": "clause", "offset": [4, 18]}, {"key": "study-methods", "type": "clause", "offset": [68, 81]}, {"key": "fy-2020", "type": "definition", "offset": [92, 99]}], "hash": "8081da9518817801f4422daf26625748", "id": 9}, {"samples": [{"hash": "cG3yxQHec72", "uri": "/contracts/cG3yxQHec72#study-area", "label": "Scope of Work", "score": 22.7467488022, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet": "The White River is a major tributary to the Green River, second only to the Yampa River in annual discharge under current conditions of development. It is more than 200 miles long and drains nearly 5,120 square miles in western Colorado and eastern Utah, merging with the Green River in northeastern Utah approximately 98 river miles downstream from the Yampa River confluence, and two miles downstream from the Duchesne River confluence. Most White River runoff derives from high elevation snow accumulation and melt. Under current conditions, average runoff in the White River is about 508,000 acre-feet annually, based on measurements at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gages near \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, Utah (#09306500) and near the Colorado State Line (#09306395) from 1975 to 2015. Median flows vary from around 350 cubic feet per second (cfs) in late summer to well over 3,000 cfs during the peak of spring snowmelt runoff. The White River, over the period identified above, contributed on average about 13% of the total annual flow in the lower Green River as measured at the USGS gage at Green River, Utah (#09315000). The hydrology of the White River is affected by various water diversions and uses within the river basin, and by one substantial mainstem impoundment, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Draw Dam, near Rangely, Colorado at river mile 103. However, compared to most other major rivers in the upper Colorado River system, the hydrology of the White River remains relatively unaltered. Agricultural water use is the single largest consumptive use in the basin. Recent estimates indicate approximately 28,100 irrigated acres in the basin in Colorado, with a corresponding average consumptive annual irrigation water requirement of approximately 46,400 acre-feet per year (CWCB 2019). Almost all of this irrigation is provided by surface water; groundwater pumping in the basin is relatively minor. As noted above, a White River Planning Team (Planning Team) is helping to guide this effort. The Team is comprised of a water user\u2019s representative, the Ute Indian Tribe, Rio \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Water Conservancy District, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Utah Water Resources, The Nature Conservancy, and the Program Director\u2019s Office (PDO). These representatives are assisting with the development of this Management Plan. ERO Resources was contracted in late 2019 to provide support for: a) modeling projected future water development scenarios to understand effects on White River hydrology and the Recovery Program\u2019s interim endangered fish flow recommendations; b) assisting with scheduling, facilitating, summarizing stakeholder and public outreach meetings; c) drafting and revising (as needed) a Management Plan; and d) assisting with NEPA compliance. Completed Hire consultant CWCB in consultation with PDO and Planning Team Completed Agree on current and future water demand scenarios to be incorporated into White River Management Plan PDO working with White River Planning Teamand other basin interests Completed Finalize provisional flow recommendations PDO and Recovery Programcommittees Completed Identify, evaluate, and recommend management actions to offset depletion impacts Consultant working with White River Planning Team and PDO Jul 2021 (one of two scenarios completed) Evaluate impacts of water demand scenario on interim recommended flows and endangered species Consultant working with White River Planning Team Sep 2021 Distribute draft Management Plan including a suite of recovery actions needed to offset depletion impacts Consultant Sep \u2013 Nov 2021 Conduct meetings with public, Yampa/White/Green Basin Roundtable, Utah, Ute Tribe, etc. to communicate content of the draft Management Plan; document results of public input. Consultant Nov 2021 Based on public input, revise draft Plan for review by CWCB, PDO, Planning Team, and White River Working Group; following review, finalize plan. Consultant Dec 2021 Develop a draft cooperative agreement framework. Initiate NEPA compliance. USFWS begins drafting PBO. Consultant Jan 2022 Complete compilation of information required for NEPA compliance. Consultant", "snippet_links": [{"key": "white-river", "type": "clause", "offset": [4, 15]}, {"key": "green-river", "type": "clause", "offset": [44, 55]}, {"key": "conditions-of-development", "type": "clause", "offset": [122, 147]}, {"key": "duchesne-river", "type": "clause", "offset": [412, 426]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [616, 624]}, {"key": "the-us", "type": "clause", "offset": [641, 648]}, {"key": "geological-survey", "type": "clause", "offset": [650, 667]}, {"key": "cubic-feet", "type": "definition", "offset": [809, 819]}, {"key": "the-period", "type": "clause", "offset": [940, 950]}, {"key": "the-total", "type": "clause", "offset": [1005, 1014]}, {"key": "affected-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [1151, 1162]}, {"key": "water-diversions", "type": "clause", "offset": [1171, 1187]}, {"key": "river-basin", "type": "definition", "offset": [1208, 1219]}, {"key": "river-mile", "type": "clause", "offset": [1309, 1319]}, {"key": "upper-colorado-river-system", "type": "definition", "offset": [1377, 1404]}, {"key": "agricultural-water-use", "type": "definition", "offset": [1469, 1491]}, {"key": "consumptive-use", "type": "definition", "offset": [1514, 1529]}, {"key": "in-colorado", "type": "clause", "offset": [1620, 1631]}, {"key": "water-requirement", "type": "definition", "offset": [1692, 1709]}, {"key": "per-year", "type": "definition", "offset": [1744, 1752]}, {"key": "surface-water", "type": "definition", "offset": [1811, 1824]}, {"key": "planning-team", "type": "clause", "offset": [1910, 1923]}, {"key": "the-team", "type": "definition", "offset": [1973, 1981]}, {"key": "comprised-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1985, 1997]}, {"key": "water-user", "type": "definition", "offset": [2000, 2010]}, {"key": "indian-tribe", "type": "clause", "offset": [2037, 2049]}, {"key": "water-conservancy-district", "type": "definition", "offset": [2062, 2088]}, {"key": "water-conservation", "type": "definition", "offset": [2103, 2121]}, {"key": "water-resources", "type": "clause", "offset": [2134, 2149]}, {"key": "the-nature-conservancy", "type": "clause", "offset": [2151, 2173]}, {"key": "program-director", "type": "definition", "offset": [2183, 2199]}, {"key": "development-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [2261, 2275]}, {"key": "management-plan", "type": "clause", "offset": [2281, 2296]}, {"key": "to-provide", "type": "definition", "offset": [2340, 2350]}, {"key": "water-development", "type": "definition", "offset": [2393, 2410]}, {"key": "recovery-program", "type": "definition", "offset": [2476, 2492]}, {"key": "public-outreach", "type": "clause", "offset": [2613, 2628]}, {"key": "as-needed", "type": "clause", "offset": [2665, 2674]}, {"key": "nepa-compliance", "type": "clause", "offset": [2717, 2732]}, {"key": "in-consultation-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [2765, 2785]}, {"key": "river-management", "type": "definition", "offset": [2899, 2915]}, {"key": "working-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [2925, 2937]}, {"key": "management-actions", "type": "definition", "offset": [3120, 3138]}, {"key": "endangered-species", "type": "clause", "offset": [3342, 3360]}, {"key": "recovery-actions", "type": "definition", "offset": [3474, 3490]}, {"key": "conduct-meetings", "type": "clause", "offset": [3552, 3568]}, {"key": "ute-tribe", "type": "definition", "offset": [3624, 3633]}, {"key": "content-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [3655, 3669]}, {"key": "public-input", "type": "definition", "offset": [3713, 3725]}, {"key": "draft-plan", "type": "definition", "offset": [3777, 3787]}, {"key": "for-review", "type": "clause", "offset": [3788, 3798]}, {"key": "working-group", "type": "definition", "offset": [3844, 3857]}, {"key": "agreement-framework", "type": "clause", "offset": [3940, 3959]}, {"key": "information-required", "type": "clause", "offset": [4058, 4078]}], "hash": "eab399be8666afc01fdd617acd0ee326", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClMSTWoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3Rzci8LEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2IhNzdHVkeS1hcmVhIzAwMDAwMDBhDKIBAmVuGAAgAA==", "clause": {"size": 117, "title": "Study Area", "children": [["", ""], ["develop-typical-cross-sections", "Develop Typical Cross Sections"], ["parking-evaluation", "\u2013 Parking Evaluation"], ["desktop-review-and-assessment", "Desktop Review and Assessment"], ["engineering-and-reporting", "Engineering and Reporting"]], "parents": [["dynamic-simulation-data", "Dynamic Simulation Data"], ["introduction", "Introduction"], ["miscellaneous", "Miscellaneous"], ["coordination-meetings", "Coordination Meetings"], ["structure-of-eia-report", "Structure of EIA Report"]], "id": "study-area", "related": [["study-population", "Study Population", "Study Population"], ["study", "Study", "Study"], ["project-site", "Project Site", "Project Site"], ["area", "Area", "Area"], ["school-improvement", "School Improvement", "School Improvement"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-07T16:38:45+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}