{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"snippet": "For purposes of this Agreement only, the following constitutes a summary of facts by the EPA and SCDHEC upon which this Agreement is based.\nA. The DOE owns and operates the SRS. The SRS produces plutonium, tritium, and other special nuclear materials for national defense, for other governmental uses, and for civilian uses. The SRS is the nation's primary source of reactor-produced nuclear defense materials. Construction of the SRS began in 1951. The SRS is located near Aiken, South Carolina, and is approximately twenty-five (25) miles southeast of Augusta, Georgia. The SRS encompasses approximately three hundred (300) square miles.\nB. In March 1979, the SRS discontinued operation of seven (7) chemical, metal, and pesticide disposal pits. In 1984, under the approval and supervision of the State of South Carolina, the SRS excavated these pits and removed contaminated material. Additional groundwater monitoring \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 were installed.\nC. On December 19, 1979, pursuant to the State of South Carolina's regulations, the SRS notified the SCDHEC of SRS's hazardous waste management activities. The SRS submitted a copy of its notification to the EPA.\nD. In August 1980, pursuant to Section 3010 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 6910, the SRS notified EPA of SRS's hazardous waste management activities and submitted a copy of the notification to the SCDHEC.\nE. On September 29, 1980, the SRS submitted \"Part A\" of its hazardous waste management permit application to the SCDHEC and EPA. Since that time, the SRS has modified its \"Part A\" to include new units or modifications to existing units. The SRS submitted \"Part B\" of its permit application on February 11, 1985.\nF. In February 1984, the SRS began groundwater corrective/remedial action by the use of an air stripper at the SRS M-Area.\nG. On May 8, 1984, the SRS prepared an assessment of its waste disposal sites and groundwater impacts (Technical Summary Groundwater Quality Protection Program at Savannah River Plant).\nH. On May 31, 1984, the DOE notified the EPA of potential CERCLA sites at DOE facilities, including the SRS.\nI. On January 7, 1987, the SRS submitted to EPA a document entitled, \"Waste Management Units - Savannah River Plant,\" which contained a listing of solid waste management units (SWMUs) on the SRS. The SWMUs list is revised annually and provided to EPA and SCDHEC.\nJ. On September 30, 1987, the SCDHEC and EPA issued a RCRA permit for the SRS. The Federal RCRA permit requires the SRS to initiate RFIs for listed SWMUs under the authority of RCRA Sections 3004(u) and (v). The State Hazardous Waste permit contains similar conditions under Section 44-56- 10, et seq., of the Hazardous Waste Management Act. The list of SWMUs was revised on May 30, 1990, to include a total of eighty-one (81) SWMUs.\nK. On October 16, 1987, the SRS submitted to EPA draft Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scores and supporting information for sixty-six (66) potential sites on the SRS. On April 28, 1988, the SRS submitted to EPA its Preliminary Assessments for these sites.\nL. In December 1987, the SRS published its final environmental impact statement (EIS), entitled, \"Waste Management Activities for Groundwater Protection: Savannah River Plant; Aiken, South Carolina.\" The purpose of the EIS was to identify and select a waste management strategy for the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous, radioactive, and mixed wastes.\nM. On May 2, 1988, the SRS submitted an RFI Program Plan to EPA and SCDHEC pursuant to its RCRA permit. On September 6, 1989, EPA conditionally approved the RFI Program Plan.\nN. On July 14, 1989, EPA proposed the SRS for inclusion on the NPL at 40 CFR Part 300 (54 Federal Register 29820).\nO. On November 21, 1989, EPA finalized the SRS on the NPL at 40 CFR Part 300 (54 Federal Register 48184), which became effective on December 21, 1989.\nP. The SRS is engaged in the generation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous wastes as defined in RCRA, 42 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 6901, et seq., and as defined in the HWMA, S.C. Code \u2587\u2587\u2587. \u00a7\u00a7 44-56-10, et seq. (Supp 1988).\nQ. The SRS releases, has released, and threatens to release hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants into the environment, as defined in CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 9601, et seq.\nR. Hazardous constituents, as defined by RCRA, and hazardous substances as defined by CERCLA, are present in the environment at the SRS.", "size": 13, "samples": [{"hash": "hcMnIKUsM1o", "uri": "/contracts/hcMnIKUsM1o#stipulated-facts", "label": "Federal Facility Agreement", "score": 26.1704311371, "published": true}, {"hash": "4cdjT8JANFJ", "uri": "/contracts/4cdjT8JANFJ#stipulated-facts", "label": "Federal Facility Agreement", "score": 26.1704311371, "published": true}, {"hash": "lmnaNaqiq0r", "uri": "/contracts/lmnaNaqiq0r#stipulated-facts", "label": "Federal Facility Agreement", "score": 25.6216926575, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "for-purposes-of-this-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 30]}, {"key": "summary-of-facts", "type": "clause", "offset": [65, 81]}, {"key": "national-defense", "type": "definition", "offset": [255, 271]}, {"key": "source-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [357, 366]}, {"key": "defense-materials", "type": "definition", "offset": [392, 409]}, {"key": "construction-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [411, 430]}, {"key": "operation-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [679, 691]}, {"key": "the-approval", "type": "clause", "offset": [763, 775]}, {"key": "state-of-south-carolina", "type": "definition", "offset": [799, 822]}, {"key": "contaminated-material", "type": "definition", "offset": [865, 886]}, {"key": "groundwater-monitoring", "type": "definition", "offset": [899, 921]}, {"key": "on-december", "type": "clause", "offset": [947, 958]}, {"key": "pursuant-to-the", "type": "definition", "offset": [969, 984]}, {"key": "management-activities", "type": "definition", "offset": [1077, 1098]}, {"key": "notification-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [1132, 1147]}, {"key": "pursuant-to-section", "type": "definition", "offset": [1176, 1195]}, {"key": "copy-of-the-notification", "type": "clause", "offset": [1312, 1336]}, {"key": "permit-application", "type": "definition", "offset": [1439, 1457]}, {"key": "new-units", "type": "clause", "offset": [1543, 1552]}, {"key": "modifications-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [1556, 1572]}, {"key": "existing-units", "type": "clause", "offset": [1573, 1587]}, {"key": "part-b", "type": "definition", "offset": [1608, 1614]}, {"key": "on-february", "type": "clause", "offset": [1642, 1653]}, {"key": "action-by-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [1731, 1744]}, {"key": "waste-disposal-sites", "type": "definition", "offset": [1844, 1864]}, {"key": "groundwater-quality", "type": "clause", "offset": [1908, 1927]}, {"key": "management-units", "type": "definition", "offset": [2158, 2174]}, {"key": "solid-waste-management", "type": "definition", "offset": [2229, 2251]}, {"key": "rcra-permit", "type": "definition", "offset": [2399, 2410]}, {"key": "the-authority", "type": "clause", "offset": [2505, 2518]}, {"key": "waste-management-act", "type": "definition", "offset": [2665, 2685]}, {"key": "hazard-ranking", "type": "definition", "offset": [2834, 2848]}, {"key": "supporting-information", "type": "definition", "offset": [2873, 2895]}, {"key": "on-april", "type": "clause", "offset": [2943, 2951]}, {"key": "final-environmental-impact-statement", "type": "definition", "offset": [3075, 3111]}, {"key": "purpose-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [3236, 3250]}, {"key": "management-strategy", "type": "definition", "offset": [3290, 3309]}, {"key": "disposal-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [3342, 3353]}, {"key": "program-plan", "type": "definition", "offset": [3440, 3452]}, {"key": "conditionally-approved", "type": "definition", "offset": [3526, 3548]}, {"key": "cfr-part", "type": "clause", "offset": [3644, 3652]}, {"key": "federal-register", "type": "clause", "offset": [3661, 3677]}, {"key": "on-november", "type": "clause", "offset": [3689, 3700]}, {"key": "engaged-in", "type": "definition", "offset": [3851, 3861]}, {"key": "hazardous-wastes", "type": "clause", "offset": [3914, 3930]}, {"key": "hazardous-substances", "type": "definition", "offset": [4116, 4136]}, {"key": "pollutants-or-contaminants", "type": "definition", "offset": [4138, 4164]}, {"key": "the-environment", "type": "clause", "offset": [4170, 4185]}, {"key": "hazardous-constituents", "type": "definition", "offset": [4239, 4261]}], "hash": "e76b6f7bdb650903e6cedd9e1639b080", "id": 1}, {"snippet": "Respondent's address on file with the Bureau is: \u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587., \u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587.", "size": 6, "samples": [{"hash": "gRsn37BPY5C", "uri": "/contracts/gRsn37BPY5C#stipulated-facts", "label": "Consent Agreement and Order", "score": 28.0204696655, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "on-file", "type": "definition", "offset": [21, 28]}, {"key": "the-bureau", "type": "clause", "offset": [34, 44]}], "hash": "86203337480cb0fcf5630cb39a1cd1aa", "id": 2}, {"snippet": "At all material times relevant to the allegations in this matter, the Commission and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 agree to the following facts:1\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 was the LVCVA President and Chief Executive Officer (\u201cCEO\u201d).\nb. The CEO is appointed by and responsible for carrying out all policy directives of the LVCVA Board, including marketing, operation of facilities, human resources, finance and public affairs.\nc. The LVCVA is a statutorily created public entity responsible as the destination marketing organization for Las Vegas to promote tourism, conventions, meetings and special events throughout Southern Nevada. It operates one of 1 Stipulated Facts do not constitute part of the \u201cInvestigative File\u201d as that term is defined by NRS 281A.755. All statutory and common law protections afforded to the Investigative File shall remain and are not affected by this Stipulated Agreement. the largest convention facilities in the world and competes for visitors with the largest visitor destinations in the world.\nd. The LVCVA is a governmental entity subject to Nevada\u2019s Open Meeting Law (NRS Chapter 241), Public Records Law (NRS Chapter 239) and Ethics Law.\ne. The LVCVA obtains its funding, in part, from a percentage of hotel taxes and fees in Southern Nevada. Its primary goal is to increase tourism in the region for economic development purposes.\nf. The LVCVA is governed by a 14-member Board comprised of 8 elected officials representing the municipalities and counties in Southern Nevada and 6 representatives from the private sector.\ng. The LVCVA maintained Board Policies, which included Policy 8.01 - Code of Conduct and Conflicts of Interest Policy (the \u201cPolicy\u201d). The Policy in effect during the relevant time period required compliance with the Ethics Law and states that LVCVA\u2019s directors, officers and employees shall work for the common good of the public that LVCVA serves and not for any private or personal interest. The Policy also prohibited LVCVA\u2019s directors, officers and employees from using their office or position for unlawful purposes or personal gain, including seeking or accepting gifts, services, favors, employments, engagements, emoluments or economic opportunities that would improperly influence their public duties; using their position in government to secure unwarranted privileges for themselves or persons to whom they have commitments in a private capacity; or using governmental property to benefit their personal or financial interests.\nh. Part of the LVCVA\u2019s mission is to develop and maintain relationships with airlines to expand and improve air service to Las Vegas and to increase visitation and hotel occupancy. To support that mission, the LVCVA purchased and received promotional gift cards and certificates annually to be used for business purposes from several airlines, including Southwest Airlines.\ni. The LVCVA had an in-house travel agency operated by LVCVA staff that booked all business travel for LVCVA employees and Board Members, and also booked personal travel for certain LVCVA executives and family members.\nj. In early 2017, the LVCVA\u2019s Finance Department became aware that the LVCVA was receiving and in possession of Southwest Airline gift cards.\nk. After the Southwest Airline gift cards were discovered, the Finance Department took possession of approximately $14,000 of Southwest Airline gift cards into its custody and thereafter maintained custody of the gift cards.\nl. When the Southwest Airline gift cards were discovered, the Finance Department learned there was no system for tracking and recording the distribution or usage of the Southwest Airline gift cards.\nm. In late 2017, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019s General \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 learned that certain personal travel for \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and his spouse had been purchased with the LVCVA\u2019s Southwest Airline gift cards.\nn. In February 2018, LVCVA\u2019s General Counsel informed the Chair of the Audit Committee of the LVCVA Board of the discovery of the personal travel purchases for Ralenkotter and his spouse with LVCVA-funded Southwest Airline gift cards.\no. The Audit Committee retained \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, Esq. (\u201c\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u201d) to investigate the matter and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 retained \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 to perform forensic accounting services regarding any personal use of LVCVA\u2019s Southwest Airline gift cards by LVCVA personnel. Ralenkotter fully cooperated with this forensic accounting investigation.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 prepared a June 8, 2018 Forensic Accounting Report (\u201cReport\u201d), which was presented to the LVCVA Board of Directors during a June 12, 2018 meeting.\nq. The Report revealed that the LVCVA purchased a total of 612 Southwest Airline gift cards totaling $90,000 with LVCVA funds between 2012 and 2017. The documentation and invoices regarding LVCVA\u2019s purchases of the Southwest Airline gift cards did not identify the purchases as gift cards and, instead, designated the purchases as related to promotional activities/events such as \u201cSummer Travel Programs,\u201d \u201cDeck Parties,\u201d and \u201cSponsorship and Planning Summits.\u201d\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 knew that the LVCVA possessed the Southwest Airline gift cards. Ralenkotter believed the gift cards were part of the negotiated package of assets the LVCVA received for providing sponsorship funds to Southwest Airlines.\ns. The Audit Report revealed that personal/non-business travel totaling approximately $17,000 was booked through the in house LVCVA travel office for \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and his family members and paid for with Southwest Airline gift cards.\nt. The Report also revealed that gift cards were redeemed for appropriate business-related travel totaling $19,979.81. The Report did not make any findings whether \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 knew about or directed the use of LVCVA funds to purchase the Southwest gift cards.\nu. The Report acknowledged that approximately 200 Southwest Airline gift cards (worth $50,000) could not be accounted, and the Report provided no explanation for how the missing gift cards might have been used. Pursuant to records provided by Southwest Airlines, the LVCVA purchased 480 Southwest gift cards between 2014 and 2017, totaling $68,000. Southwest did not retain records related to approximately 132 gift cards purchased by LVCVA between 2012 and 2014.\nv. The records provided by Southwest Airlines revealed that at least seven of the Southwest Airline gift cards purchased with LVCVA funds were used for personal travel by other LVCVA employees not identified in the Audit Report, including members of the LVCVA executive team. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 gave these gift cards (each valued at $200) to the employees as gifts.\nw. The LVCVA maintained an Employee Handbook that summarized the policies and programs of the agency applicable to its employees. The August 2012 and December 2015 versions of the Employee Handbook included a \u201cBusiness Ethics\u201d section that contained the following language, in relevant part: \u201cEmployees may not use, divert, or appropriate Authority property, equipment, services, or assets for personal use or benefit.\u201d\nx. The September 2016 version of the LVCVA Employee Handbook included an expanded \u201cBusiness Ethics\u201d section that contained the following language, in relevant part: Employees are prohibited from taking personal opportunities that are discovered through the use of corporate property, information or position without approval. Employees may not use corporate property, information or position for personal gain.\n1. Employees should protect the LVCVA\u2019s assets and ensure their efficient use. Theft, carelessness and waste have a direct impact on the LVCVA\u2019s profitability. All LVCVA assets should be used for legitimate business purposes.\n2. LVCVA resources may be used for minor personal uses, as long as such use is reasonable, does not interfere with duties, is not done for pecuniary gain, does not conflict with the LVCVA\u2019s business, and does not violate any LVCVA policy.\ny. The LVCVA maintained Board Policies, which included Policy 2.02 \u2013 Responsibilities of President and CEO. One responsibility of the President/CEO listed in Policy 2.02 was to \u201c[e]nsure that LVCVA policies are uniformly understood and administered by his/her subordinates.\u201d\nz. In response to the audit findings, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 reimbursed the LVCVA for the total value of the Southwest gift cards he used for his private use.\naa. Also, in response to the audit findings, the LVCVA implemented new policies to clarify the procedure for using travel gift cards provided to the LVCVA, and to prevent use of gift cards for personal travel in the future.\nbb. During an LVCVA Audit Committee Meeting on April 25, 2018, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 acknowledged his unintentional misuse of the Southwest gift cards, recognized that LVCVA lacked proper procedure regarding these assets, and assured the Audit Committee that policies had been implemented to ensure the proper use of such assets in the future.\ncc. Later, during a Board of Directors Meeting on June 12, 2018, Secretary \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 thanked the Audit Committee and independent counsel for their work, recognized \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 for accepting responsibility for his unintentional misuse of the gift cards, and noted that \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 lacked awareness regarding the purchase of the gift cards.\ndd. Between approximately April 2018 and August 31, 2018, LVCVA and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 publicly discussed \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019\u2587 intentions to resign from the LCVA after more than 45 years with the agency and develop a succession plan with a new CEO. LVCVA and Ralenkotter were publicly transparent about intentions to seek a separation agreement with Ralenkotter which would include an on-going consulting agreement with LVCVA to transition to the new CEO.\nee. Both the LVCVA and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 retained independent counsel to handle the consulting agreement negotiations.\nff. LVCVA posted a public meeting agenda with backup staff materials and recommendations for its anticipated August 14, 2018 Board Meeting, which included a purported separation agreement and future consulting agreement between LVCVA and Ralenkotter. The proposed separation agreement included his anticipated PERS pension.\ngg. During the August 14, 2018 Board Meeting, the LVCVA Board approved the recommended separation agreement and future consulting agreement with Ralenkotter, through his private limited liability company, GoGaels, LLC. As part of the consulting agreement, LVCVA agreed to pay Ralenkotter a flat rate of $15,000 per month for 18 months for Ralenkotter\u2019s services consulting on various projects and issues affecting LVCVA during the transition to the new CEO. The separation agreement and future consulting agreement were approved by the Board.\nhh. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 was still employed as the CEO of LVCVA during the time the consulting agreement was negotiated and executed, to be effective the day after his retirement on September 1, 2018.", "size": 2, "samples": [{"hash": "iuMMWxyZjlM", "uri": "/contracts/iuMMWxyZjlM#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 27.7250061035, "published": true}, {"hash": "kIMlicODSej", "uri": "/contracts/kIMlicODSej#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 27.6291980743, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-commission", "type": "clause", "offset": [66, 80]}, {"key": "agree-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [97, 105]}, {"key": "president-and-chief-executive-officer", "type": "clause", "offset": [157, 194]}, {"key": "the-ceo", "type": "clause", "offset": [207, 214]}, {"key": "responsible-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [235, 250]}, {"key": "policy-directives", "type": "clause", "offset": [268, 285]}, {"key": "operation-of-facilities", "type": "clause", "offset": [327, 350]}, {"key": "human-resources", "type": "clause", "offset": [352, 367]}, {"key": "public-affairs", "type": "definition", "offset": [381, 395]}, {"key": "public-entity", "type": "clause", "offset": [435, 448]}, {"key": "the-destination", "type": "clause", "offset": [464, 479]}, {"key": "marketing-organization", "type": "definition", "offset": [480, 502]}, {"key": "las-vegas", "type": "definition", "offset": [507, 516]}, {"key": "and-special-events", "type": "clause", "offset": [559, 577]}, {"key": "southern-nevada", "type": "definition", "offset": [589, 604]}, {"key": "investigative-file", "type": "definition", "offset": [675, 693]}, {"key": "common-law", "type": "clause", "offset": [754, 764]}, {"key": "affected-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [837, 848]}, {"key": "stipulated-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [854, 874]}, {"key": "convention-facilities", "type": "definition", "offset": [888, 909]}, {"key": "the-world", "type": "definition", "offset": [913, 922]}, {"key": "governmental-entity", "type": "definition", "offset": [1019, 1038]}, {"key": "subject-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [1039, 1049]}, {"key": "open-meeting-law", "type": "definition", "offset": [1059, 1075]}, {"key": "public-records-law", "type": "definition", "offset": [1095, 1113]}, {"key": "ethics-law", "type": "clause", "offset": [1136, 1146]}, {"key": "a-percentage", "type": "definition", "offset": [1196, 1208]}, {"key": "taxes-and-fees", "type": "definition", "offset": [1218, 1232]}, {"key": "in-the-region", "type": "definition", "offset": [1293, 1306]}, {"key": "economic-development-purposes", "type": "definition", "offset": [1311, 1340]}, {"key": "member-board", "type": "definition", "offset": [1375, 1387]}, {"key": "comprised-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [1388, 1400]}, {"key": "elected-officials", "type": "definition", "offset": [1403, 1420]}, {"key": "private-sector", "type": "clause", "offset": [1516, 1530]}, {"key": "board-policies", "type": "clause", "offset": [1556, 1570]}, {"key": "code-of-conduct", "type": "definition", "offset": [1601, 1616]}, {"key": "conflicts-of-interest-policy", "type": "definition", "offset": [1621, 1649]}, {"key": "the-policy", "type": "definition", "offset": [1666, 1676]}, {"key": "in-effect", "type": "clause", "offset": [1677, 1686]}, {"key": "relevant-time-period", "type": "definition", "offset": [1698, 1718]}, {"key": "compliance-with-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [1728, 1747]}, {"key": "employees-shall", "type": "clause", "offset": [1807, 1822]}, {"key": "work-for", "type": "definition", "offset": [1823, 1831]}, {"key": "the-public", "type": "clause", "offset": [1851, 1861]}, {"key": "personal-interest", "type": "clause", "offset": [1907, 1924]}, {"key": "unlawful-purposes", "type": "clause", "offset": [2035, 2052]}, {"key": "personal-gain", "type": "clause", "offset": [2056, 2069]}, {"key": "economic-opportunities", "type": "definition", "offset": [2167, 2189]}, {"key": "improperly-influence", "type": "definition", "offset": [2201, 2221]}, {"key": "public-duties", "type": "clause", "offset": [2228, 2241]}, {"key": "to-secure", "type": "clause", "offset": [2278, 2287]}, {"key": "persons-to-whom", "type": "clause", "offset": [2329, 2344]}, {"key": "governmental-property", "type": "definition", "offset": [2399, 2420]}, {"key": "financial-interests", "type": "clause", "offset": [2450, 2469]}, {"key": "to-develop", "type": "definition", "offset": [2505, 2515]}, {"key": "gift-cards", "type": "definition", "offset": [2722, 2732]}, {"key": "travel-agency", "type": "definition", "offset": [2874, 2887]}, {"key": "business-travel", "type": "clause", "offset": [2928, 2943]}, {"key": "board-members", "type": "definition", "offset": [2968, 2981]}, {"key": "personal-travel", "type": "clause", "offset": [2999, 3014]}, {"key": "family-members", "type": "definition", "offset": [3048, 3062]}, {"key": "finance-department", "type": "clause", "offset": [3094, 3112]}, {"key": "possession-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [3162, 3175]}, {"key": "the-gift", "type": "clause", "offset": [3415, 3423]}, {"key": "the-distribution", "type": "clause", "offset": [3567, 3583]}, {"key": "usage-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [3587, 3599]}, {"key": "general-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [3655, 3664]}, {"key": "for-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [3708, 3713]}, {"key": "february-2018", "type": "clause", "offset": [3811, 3824]}, {"key": "general-counsel", "type": "definition", "offset": [3834, 3849]}, {"key": "the-audit-committee", "type": "clause", "offset": [3872, 3891]}, {"key": "discovery-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [3918, 3930]}, {"key": "the-personal", "type": "clause", "offset": [3931, 3943]}, {"key": "travel-purchases", "type": "definition", "offset": [3944, 3960]}, {"key": "accounting-services", "type": "definition", "offset": [4173, 4192]}, {"key": "personal-use", "type": "clause", "offset": [4207, 4219]}, {"key": "accounting-report", "type": "definition", "offset": [4402, 4419]}, {"key": "presented-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [4442, 4454]}, {"key": "the-report", "type": "clause", "offset": [4519, 4529]}, {"key": "the-purchases", "type": "clause", "offset": [4777, 4790]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [4847, 4857]}, {"key": "promotional-activities", "type": "definition", "offset": [4858, 4880]}, {"key": "sponsorship-funds", "type": "clause", "offset": [5172, 5189]}, {"key": "audit-report", "type": "clause", "offset": [5220, 5232]}, {"key": "pursuant-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [5917, 5928]}, {"key": "retain-records", "type": "clause", "offset": [6073, 6087]}, {"key": "the-records", "type": "clause", "offset": [6173, 6184]}, {"key": "members-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [6409, 6423]}, {"key": "executive-team", "type": "definition", "offset": [6430, 6444]}, {"key": "the-employees", "type": "clause", "offset": [6505, 6518]}, {"key": "employee-handbook", "type": "definition", "offset": [6556, 6573]}, {"key": "policies-and-programs", "type": "clause", "offset": [6594, 6615]}, {"key": "the-agency", "type": "clause", "offset": [6619, 6629]}, {"key": "applicable-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [6630, 6643]}, {"key": "august-2012", "type": "clause", "offset": [6663, 6674]}, {"key": "december-2015", "type": "clause", "offset": [6679, 6692]}, {"key": "business-ethics", "type": "clause", "offset": [6739, 6754]}, {"key": "relevant-part", "type": "definition", "offset": [6806, 6819]}, {"key": "employees-may", "type": "clause", "offset": [6822, 6835]}, {"key": "authority-property", "type": "clause", "offset": [6868, 6886]}, {"key": "september-2016", "type": "clause", "offset": [6956, 6970]}, {"key": "taking-personal", "type": "clause", "offset": [7144, 7159]}, {"key": "corporate-property", "type": "clause", "offset": [7213, 7231]}, {"key": "efficient-use", "type": "definition", "offset": [7424, 7437]}, {"key": "direct-impact", "type": "definition", "offset": [7476, 7489]}, {"key": "legitimate-business-purposes", "type": "definition", "offset": [7556, 7584]}, {"key": "pecuniary-gain", "type": "definition", "offset": [7725, 7739]}, {"key": "responsibilities-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [7894, 7913]}, {"key": "president-and-ceo", "type": "definition", "offset": [7914, 7931]}, {"key": "the-president", "type": "clause", "offset": [7955, 7968]}, {"key": "in-policy", "type": "clause", "offset": [7980, 7989]}, {"key": "audit-findings", "type": "clause", "offset": [8122, 8136]}, {"key": "total-value", "type": "definition", "offset": [8179, 8190]}, {"key": "private-use", "type": "clause", "offset": [8235, 8246]}, {"key": "new-policies", "type": "clause", "offset": [8315, 8327]}, {"key": "procedure-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [8343, 8356]}, {"key": "the-future", "type": "clause", "offset": [8460, 8470]}, {"key": "committee-meeting", "type": "definition", "offset": [8498, 8515]}, {"key": "april-25", "type": "definition", "offset": [8519, 8527]}, {"key": "proper-procedure", "type": "clause", "offset": [8643, 8659]}, {"key": "to-ensure", "type": "clause", "offset": [8751, 8760]}, {"key": "proper-use", "type": "definition", "offset": [8765, 8775]}, {"key": "board-of-directors-meeting", "type": "definition", "offset": [8826, 8852]}, {"key": "counsel-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [8937, 8948]}, {"key": "responsibility-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [8998, 9016]}, {"key": "that-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [9071, 9077]}, {"key": "purchase-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [9119, 9134]}, {"key": "april-2018", "type": "clause", "offset": [9173, 9183]}, {"key": "succession-plan", "type": "clause", "offset": [9350, 9365]}, {"key": "separation-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [9457, 9477]}, {"key": "consulting-agreement", "type": "definition", "offset": [9527, 9547]}, {"key": "to-handle", "type": "definition", "offset": [9653, 9662]}, {"key": "the-consulting", "type": "clause", "offset": [9663, 9677]}, {"key": "agreement-negotiations", "type": "clause", "offset": [9678, 9700]}, {"key": "meeting-agenda", "type": "clause", "offset": [9728, 9742]}, {"key": "recommendations-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [9775, 9794]}, {"key": "board-meeting", "type": "clause", "offset": [9827, 9840]}, {"key": "future-consulting", "type": "clause", "offset": [9894, 9911]}, {"key": "agreement-between", "type": "clause", "offset": [9912, 9929]}, {"key": "the-proposed", "type": "clause", "offset": [9953, 9965]}, {"key": "pers-pension", "type": "clause", "offset": [10012, 10024]}, {"key": "board-approved", "type": "clause", "offset": [10082, 10096]}, {"key": "limited-liability-company", "type": "definition", "offset": [10204, 10229]}, {"key": "to-pay", "type": "clause", "offset": [10295, 10301]}, {"key": "rate-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [10321, 10328]}, {"key": "per-month", "type": "clause", "offset": [10337, 10346]}, {"key": "the-separation", "type": "clause", "offset": [10484, 10498]}, {"key": "approved-by-the-board", "type": "definition", "offset": [10546, 10567]}, {"key": "the-day", "type": "definition", "offset": [10710, 10717]}], "hash": "1a51a1d82b5664416e9a48c43acd940e", "id": 10}, {"snippet": "For purposes of this Agreement only, the stipulated facts presented in Appendix D (Stipulated Facts) to this Agreement constitute a summary of facts upon which this Agreement is based.", "size": 3, "samples": [{"hash": "gxFD2kKifbw", "uri": "/contracts/gxFD2kKifbw#stipulated-facts", "label": "Federal Facility Agreement", "score": 19.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "euo9NZ24vLb", "uri": "/contracts/euo9NZ24vLb#stipulated-facts", "label": "Federal Facility Agreement", "score": 19.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "d7MLAtsUitp", "uri": "/contracts/d7MLAtsUitp#stipulated-facts", "label": "Federal Facility Agreement", "score": 19.0, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "for-purposes-of-this-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 30]}, {"key": "appendix-d", "type": "clause", "offset": [71, 81]}, {"key": "to-this-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [101, 118]}, {"key": "summary-of-facts", "type": "clause", "offset": [132, 148]}], "hash": "0fa194a35586b14001b065e09b5a0ed0", "id": 6}, {"snippet": "At all material times, the following stipulated facts were relevant to these matters:1\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 has served as a City Councilmember for the City of Mesquite since 2011. He is a public officer as defined in NRS 281A.160.\nb. The City of Mesquite is a political subdivision as defined in NRS 281A.145.\nc. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, Esq. is a lawyer licensed in Nevada and is the City Attorney for Mesquite.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 is a licensed real estate agent in Nevada.\ne. On October 20, 2011, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 entered into an Independent Contractor Agreement with Premier Properties of Mesquite Nevada, LLC (\u201cPremier Properties\u201d).\nf. Pursuant to his Agreement with Premier Properties, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 receives no salary but is entitled to 80% of the commission collected by Premier Properties from real estate sales transactions closed by \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 does not receive any commission or other compensation for transactions made by the other real estate agents of Premier Properties.\ng. Pursuant to an agreement between Premier Properties and Legacy Homes, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 works full-time as a sales representative selling new homes at three Legacy Homes (\u201cLegacy\u201d) developments in Mesquite. He is the sole real estate sales agent for Legacy in Mesquite.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 is permitted to list homes as a Premier Properties agent, and he has done so approximately 5 times since 2011 for Legacy homeowners who were listing their homes for resale.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 works out of a sales office located in a Legacy model home, utilizing office supplies provided by Legacy and an assistant who is employed by Legacy.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019\u2587 listings of new Legacy properties appear on the Premier Properties website, where he is identified as one of twenty agents of Premier Properties. 1 Stipulated Facts do not constitute part of the \u201cInvestigative File\u201d as that term is defined by NRS 281A.440(17). All statutory and common law protections afforded to the Investigative File shall remain and are not affected by this Stipulated Agreement.\nk. At the City Council\u2019s April 14, 2015 meeting, the Council approved a resolution finding that it was in the best interests of the City to sell certain city-owned real property consisting of approximately 104 acres in the Mesquite Technology and Commerce Center (hereafter \u201cMTCC Property\u201d).\nl. Three entities approached the City to express interest in purchasing the MTCC Property:\n1) 333 Eagles Landing, LLC (\u201cEagles Landing\u201d);\n2) Mesquite Exit 118 Group, LLC; and\n3) Mr. Hae Un \u2587\u2587\u2587.", "size": 2, "samples": [{"hash": "kDeD8QpZxkM", "uri": "/contracts/kDeD8QpZxkM#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 26.3663330078, "published": true}, {"hash": "97HJ67BKoOw", "uri": "/contracts/97HJ67BKoOw#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 25.8790054321, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "city-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [140, 147]}, {"key": "political-subdivision", "type": "clause", "offset": [249, 270]}, {"key": "in-nevada", "type": "clause", "offset": [344, 353]}, {"key": "city-attorney", "type": "definition", "offset": [365, 378]}, {"key": "licensed-real-estate-agent", "type": "clause", "offset": [408, 434]}, {"key": "entered-into", "type": "clause", "offset": [477, 489]}, {"key": "independent-contractor-agreement", "type": "definition", "offset": [493, 525]}, {"key": "no-salary", "type": "clause", "offset": [668, 677]}, {"key": "the-commission", "type": "clause", "offset": [704, 718]}, {"key": "sales-transactions", "type": "definition", "offset": [768, 786]}, {"key": "for-transactions", "type": "clause", "offset": [866, 882]}, {"key": "other-real-estate", "type": "definition", "offset": [895, 912]}, {"key": "agreement-between", "type": "clause", "offset": [961, 978]}, {"key": "sales-representative", "type": "clause", "offset": [1044, 1064]}, {"key": "sales-agent", "type": "clause", "offset": [1169, 1180]}, {"key": "sales-office", "type": "clause", "offset": [1413, 1425]}, {"key": "located-in", "type": "definition", "offset": [1426, 1436]}, {"key": "model-home", "type": "clause", "offset": [1446, 1456]}, {"key": "supplies-provided", "type": "clause", "offset": [1475, 1492]}, {"key": "an-assistant-who", "type": "clause", "offset": [1507, 1523]}, {"key": "employed-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [1527, 1538]}, {"key": "legacy-properties", "type": "definition", "offset": [1575, 1592]}, {"key": "investigative-file", "type": "definition", "offset": [1755, 1773]}, {"key": "common-law", "type": "clause", "offset": [1838, 1848]}, {"key": "affected-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [1921, 1932]}, {"key": "stipulated-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [1938, 1958]}, {"key": "city-council", "type": "definition", "offset": [1970, 1982]}, {"key": "the-council", "type": "clause", "offset": [2009, 2020]}, {"key": "best-interests", "type": "clause", "offset": [2070, 2084]}, {"key": "to-sell", "type": "clause", "offset": [2097, 2104]}, {"key": "owned-real-property", "type": "clause", "offset": [2118, 2137]}], "hash": "a5d1cb1f284d3118c5c4d3177b78cf61", "id": 7}, {"snippet": "The following events are relevant to this matter:", "size": 4, "samples": [{"hash": "jvHfZo7uwtb", "uri": "/contracts/jvHfZo7uwtb#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 30.4093475342, "published": true}, {"hash": "c1CKdVVOzws", "uri": "/contracts/c1CKdVVOzws#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 23.1334247589, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [], "hash": "b14fcab079fe5d7821387ef704055694", "id": 5}, {"snippet": "The following events are relevant to the matter:\na. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, a CCSD Trustee, is a public officer as defined in NRS 281A.160.\nb. CCSD is a political subdivision as defined in NRS 281A.145.\nc. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, Esq., General Counsel for CCSD, is a licensed Nevada attorney, and serves as the legal adviser to the CCSD and its elected trustees.\nd. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 is employed as a CCSD Administrative Secretary II for the Board, serves as secretary to Trustee \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, and is a public employee as defined in NRS 281A.150.\ne. At a special meeting of the Board, the Board discussed the substance of a potential ballot question, and voted unanimously on Friday, June 8, 2012 to place a capital projects tax question on the Clark County ballot in the November 6, 2012 election.\nf. Nevada Revised Statutes state that a local school board of trustees \u201cmay build, purchase or rent schoolhouses and other school buildings,\u201d (NRS 393.080(1) (a)) and that it \u201cshall keep the public school buildings . . . in such repair as is necessary for the comfort and health of pupils and teachers.\u201d (NRS 393.100) The Board voted to approve the formation of a ballot question which sought voter support for additional taxes or the issuance of bonds to construct and maintain adequate school facilities.\ng. Later known as \u201cBallot Question 2\u201d the question proposed to permit the CCSD to levy an additional property tax rate not to exceed 21.2 cents (per $100 of assessed valuation) to finance capital projects for schools, including constructing and equipping school improvements and replacements and acquiring school sites.\nh. Various members of the Board reached out to community supporters to increase awareness and support for Ballot Question 2, and partnered with the School Improvement Committee, a political action committee (hereafter referred to as the \u201cPAC\u201d), to promote its passage.\ni. Throughout the campaign, the PAC, Trustees and CCSD made careful efforts to separate activities to ensure that any persuasive materials, activities, and communications related to Ballot Question 2 were paid for by the PAC rather than the school district.\nj. CCSD offered parents and employees objective information related to the needs of the schools and the impact that the successful passage of Ballot Question 2 would have on CCSD.\nk. On October 17, 2012, three days prior to the beginning of early voting in Clark County Nevada, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 caused an email to be sent to her constituent list which informed her constituents about how to get involved in supporting Ballot Question 2 if they chose to do so.\nl. The email in question, which had been prepared by \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 (a CCSD staff member), was distributed to the Trustees for dissemination to their contacts in the community.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 confirmed that CCSD General Counsel \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 had approved the email\u2019s content and that he had advised that forwarding it to her constituent list was permissible.\nn. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, a CCSD employee assigned to support \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and another Board member in their Trustee duties, maintains \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019\u2587 constituent list, and facilitates \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019\u2587 correspondence, in addition to providing other administrative support.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 asked \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 to forward the October 17 email to \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019\u2587 constituent list on her behalf.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 forwarded the October 17 email to \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019\u2587 constituent list as instructed.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 estimates that it took her approximately 30 seconds to forward the email.\nr. The cost CCSD incurred or expended for the use of the CCSD interact email system to send the October 17 email was negligible to the point that it is virtually unmeasurable.\ns. Using Nary to send the email did not cause CCSD to pay Nary any sum in excess of her full-time pay.\n\u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 understood that \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019s job description included helping \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 with communications to her email contact lists. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 also understood the advice of CCSD General Counsel to be reliable that asking \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 to send the email would not cause an additional expense to be incurred in violation of the Ethics Laws.", "size": 6, "samples": [{"hash": "lTK2LPjM9Sd", "uri": "/contracts/lTK2LPjM9Sd#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 21.1334247589, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "political-subdivision", "type": "clause", "offset": [144, 165]}, {"key": "counsel-for", "type": "clause", "offset": [229, 240]}, {"key": "legal-adviser", "type": "definition", "offset": [296, 309]}, {"key": "elected-trustees", "type": "definition", "offset": [330, 346]}, {"key": "secretary-ii", "type": "definition", "offset": [401, 413]}, {"key": "for-the-board", "type": "definition", "offset": [414, 427]}, {"key": "public-employee", "type": "definition", "offset": [484, 499]}, {"key": "meeting-of-the-board", "type": "definition", "offset": [544, 564]}, {"key": "substance-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [590, 602]}, {"key": "ballot-question", "type": "definition", "offset": [615, 630]}, {"key": "to-place", "type": "definition", "offset": [678, 686]}, {"key": "capital-projects", "type": "clause", "offset": [689, 705]}, {"key": "clark-county", "type": "definition", "offset": [726, 738]}, {"key": "nevada-revised-statutes", "type": "definition", "offset": [783, 806]}, {"key": "board-of-trustees", "type": "clause", "offset": [833, 850]}, {"key": "school-buildings", "type": "clause", "offset": [903, 919]}, {"key": "public-school", "type": "definition", "offset": [971, 984]}, {"key": "necessary-for", "type": "definition", "offset": [1022, 1035]}, {"key": "and-health", "type": "clause", "offset": [1048, 1058]}, {"key": "to-approve", "type": "clause", "offset": [1114, 1124]}, {"key": "formation-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1129, 1141]}, {"key": "additional-taxes", "type": "clause", "offset": [1191, 1207]}, {"key": "issuance-of-bonds", "type": "clause", "offset": [1215, 1232]}, {"key": "to-construct", "type": "definition", "offset": [1233, 1245]}, {"key": "school-facilities", "type": "definition", "offset": [1268, 1285]}, {"key": "question-2", "type": "clause", "offset": [1313, 1323]}, {"key": "tax-rate", "type": "clause", "offset": [1397, 1405]}, {"key": "not-to-exceed", "type": "definition", "offset": [1406, 1419]}, {"key": "assessed-valuation", "type": "definition", "offset": [1444, 1462]}, {"key": "for-schools", "type": "clause", "offset": [1492, 1503]}, {"key": "school-sites", "type": "definition", "offset": [1593, 1605]}, {"key": "members-of-the-board", "type": "clause", "offset": [1618, 1638]}, {"key": "and-support", "type": "clause", "offset": [1697, 1708]}, {"key": "school-improvement-committee", "type": "clause", "offset": [1755, 1783]}, {"key": "political-action-committee", "type": "definition", "offset": [1787, 1813]}, {"key": "the-campaign", "type": "clause", "offset": [1890, 1902]}, {"key": "to-ensure", "type": "clause", "offset": [1975, 1984]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [2047, 2057]}, {"key": "the-school-district", "type": "clause", "offset": [2113, 2132]}, {"key": "objective-information", "type": "definition", "offset": [2172, 2193]}, {"key": "the-schools", "type": "clause", "offset": [2218, 2229]}, {"key": "the-successful", "type": "clause", "offset": [2250, 2264]}, {"key": "prior-to-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [2349, 2361]}, {"key": "beginning-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [2362, 2374]}, {"key": "early-voting", "type": "clause", "offset": [2375, 2387]}, {"key": "prepared-by", "type": "clause", "offset": [2625, 2636]}, {"key": "staff-member", "type": "definition", "offset": [2660, 2672]}, {"key": "the-trustees", "type": "clause", "offset": [2694, 2706]}, {"key": "in-the-community", "type": "definition", "offset": [2743, 2759]}, {"key": "employee-assigned", "type": "clause", "offset": [2962, 2979]}, {"key": "board-member", "type": "definition", "offset": [3010, 3022]}, {"key": "trustee-duties", "type": "clause", "offset": [3032, 3046]}, {"key": "in-addition-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [3126, 3140]}, {"key": "other-administrative-support", "type": "clause", "offset": [3151, 3179]}, {"key": "the-cost", "type": "clause", "offset": [3446, 3454]}, {"key": "email-system", "type": "clause", "offset": [3514, 3526]}, {"key": "to-pay", "type": "clause", "offset": [3670, 3676]}, {"key": "that-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [3743, 3749]}, {"key": "job-description", "type": "clause", "offset": [3755, 3770]}, {"key": "contact-lists", "type": "clause", "offset": [3828, 3841]}, {"key": "counsel-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [3893, 3903]}, {"key": "additional-expense", "type": "definition", "offset": [3970, 3988]}, {"key": "violation-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [4007, 4023]}, {"key": "ethics-laws", "type": "clause", "offset": [4024, 4035]}], "hash": "ebb1804fba7f535c2058188542f4baa6", "id": 3}, {"snippet": "At all material times, the following stipulated facts were relevant to this matter:", "size": 4, "samples": [{"hash": "huTtjFEp8LF", "uri": "/contracts/huTtjFEp8LF#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 33.4314002991, "published": true}, {"hash": "aOi53jbk2om", "uri": "/contracts/aOi53jbk2om#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 25.2658348083, "published": true}, {"hash": "10FY5WDL50o", "uri": "/contracts/10FY5WDL50o#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulated Agreement", "score": 24.5650691986, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [], "hash": "ff054232938e82cc7aead5999e5fa0bc", "id": 4}, {"snippet": "The Settling Parties have stipulated to the facts set forth below for purposes of this Settlement Agreement.\n1. In 2020, PG&E initiated a total of seven PSPS events and submitted seven post event reports to the Commission.\n2. As authorized by the Commission, SED investigated PG&E\u2019s compliance with Resolution ESRB-8, Decision (D.) \u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587\u2587 and D.\u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587\u2587 in executing its 2020 PSPS events.\n3. On June 15, 2022, the SED issued a proposed Administrative Enforcement Order (AEO) to PG&E pursuant to the Commission Enforcement Policy adopted by Resolution M-4846.\n4. In the AEO, SED alleges that PG&E did not comply with provisions of Commission Resolution ESRB-8, D.\u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587\u2587, and D.\u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587\u2587, as identified in the AEO and detailed in attachment to the Administrative Enforcement Order \u201c2020 Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) Post Event Report Review\u201d (2020 Post Event Report).\n5. In the AEO, SED directs PG&E to take six corrective actions to address findings in the AEO. \u2587\u2587\u2587 also recommends that PG&E pay a monetary penalty of $12 million due to PG&E\u2019s failure to notify some customers during de-energization and re-energization.\n6. PG&E submitted a Request for Hearing of the proposed AEO on the grounds that the $12 million penalty was excessive. PG&E has implemented or will implement the corrective actions, including modifying procedures to provide notice to customers upon de-energization.", "size": 2, "samples": [{"hash": "diBlP5IfJBJ", "uri": "/contracts/diBlP5IfJBJ#stipulated-facts", "label": "Settlement Agreement", "score": 31.7752952576, "published": true}, {"hash": "j3LwdcnFD8", "uri": "/contracts/j3LwdcnFD8#stipulated-facts", "label": "Settlement Agreement", "score": 31.5204658508, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-settling-parties", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 20]}, {"key": "the-facts", "type": "clause", "offset": [40, 49]}, {"key": "for-purposes-of-this", "type": "clause", "offset": [66, 86]}, {"key": "settlement-agreement", "type": "definition", "offset": [87, 107]}, {"key": "reports-to-the-commission", "type": "clause", "offset": [196, 221]}, {"key": "by-the-commission", "type": "clause", "offset": [240, 257]}, {"key": "compliance-with-resolution", "type": "clause", "offset": [283, 309]}, {"key": "a-proposed", "type": "clause", "offset": [429, 439]}, {"key": "administrative-enforcement-order", "type": "definition", "offset": [440, 472]}, {"key": "to-pge", "type": "clause", "offset": [479, 486]}, {"key": "pursuant-to-the", "type": "definition", "offset": [487, 502]}, {"key": "enforcement-policy", "type": "definition", "offset": [514, 532]}, {"key": "comply-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [608, 619]}, {"key": "provisions-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [620, 633]}, {"key": "public-safety-power-shutoff", "type": "definition", "offset": [792, 819]}, {"key": "report-review", "type": "clause", "offset": [838, 851]}, {"key": "corrective-actions", "type": "definition", "offset": [923, 941]}, {"key": "monetary-penalty", "type": "definition", "offset": [1010, 1026]}, {"key": "failure-to-notify", "type": "definition", "offset": [1056, 1073]}, {"key": "request-for-hearing", "type": "clause", "offset": [1153, 1172]}, {"key": "the-proposed", "type": "clause", "offset": [1176, 1188]}, {"key": "notice-to-customers", "type": "clause", "offset": [1357, 1376]}], "hash": "acb0dd6535f696ffd8a747473c2e4d66", "id": 8}, {"snippet": "On September 9, 2011, Cintex Wireless, LLC (\u201cCintex\u201d) filed an application with the Missouri Public Service Commission seeking designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (\u201cETC\u201d) for the purpose of receiving federal universal service fund support for low income customers through the Lifeline program as a wireless carrier in the State of Missouri. On December 16, 2011, the Staff recommended that Cintex be granted ETC status.", "size": 2, "samples": [{"hash": "fjFMWBjf3ze", "uri": "/contracts/fjFMWBjf3ze#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulation and Agreement", "score": 19.8705596924, "published": true}, {"hash": "kcNUYkaOP3E", "uri": "/contracts/kcNUYkaOP3E#stipulated-facts", "label": "Stipulation and Agreement", "score": 16.6469764709, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "public-service-commission", "type": "definition", "offset": [93, 118]}, {"key": "eligible-telecommunications-carrier", "type": "definition", "offset": [145, 180]}, {"key": "for-the-purpose-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [189, 207]}, {"key": "federal-universal-service-fund", "type": "clause", "offset": [218, 248]}, {"key": "low-income-customers", "type": "clause", "offset": [261, 281]}, {"key": "lifeline-program", "type": "clause", "offset": [294, 310]}, {"key": "wireless-carrier", "type": "definition", "offset": [316, 332]}, {"key": "state-of-missouri", "type": "clause", "offset": [340, 357]}, {"key": "on-december", "type": "clause", "offset": [359, 370]}], "hash": "cc4a97588c9cb8e0ad27957a50dbab5f", "id": 9}], "next_curs": "ClkSU2oVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjULEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2IhlzdGlwdWxhdGVkLWZhY3RzIzAwMDAwMDBhDKIBAmVuGAAgAA==", "clause": {"parents": [["recitals", "Recitals"], ["parties", "PARTIES"], ["consistency-with-precedent", "Consistency with Precedent"], ["number-of-customers-affected-13", "Number of Customers Affected 13"]], "children": [["whereas", "WHEREAS"], ["background", "Background"], ["medical-care", "MEDICAL CARE"], ["", ""], ["flipping", "Flipping"]], "size": 378, "title": "Stipulated Facts", "id": "stipulated-facts", "related": [["court-appearance", "Court Appearance", "Court Appearance"], ["records-of-purchases", "Records of Purchases", "Records of Purchases"], ["leave-for-court-appearances", "Leave for Court Appearances", "Leave for Court Appearances"], ["court", "Court", "Court"], ["stipulation", "Stipulation", "Stipulation"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-10T04:27:38+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}