Standing and Choice of Law. That each State Mortgage Regulator has standing to enforce this Agreement in the judicial or administrative process otherwise authorized under the laws and regulations of the corresponding Participating State. Upon entry, this Agreement shall be deemed a final order of each respective State Mortgage Regulator unless adoption of a subsequent order is necessary under the laws of the corresponding Participating State. In the event of any disagreement between any State Mortgage Regulator and Respondent regarding the enforceability or interpretation of this Agreement and compliance therewith, the courts or administrative agency authorized under the laws of the corresponding Participating State shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute, and the laws of the Participating State shall govern the interpretation, construction, and enforceability of this Agreement.
Standing and Choice of Law. That each State Mortgage Regulator has standing to enforce this Agreement in the judicial or administrative process otherwise authorized under the laws and regulations of the corresponding Participating State. Upon entry, this Agreement shall be deemed a final order of the respective State Mortgage Regulators unless adoption of a subsequent order is necessary under the laws of the Participating States. In the event of any disagreement between any State Mortgage Regulator and New Day regarding the enforceability or interpretation of this Agreement and compliance therewith, the courts or administrative agency authorized under the laws of the Participating State shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute, and the laws of the Participating State shall govern the interpretation, construction, and enforceability of this Agreement. Additionally, a State Mortgage Regulator may consider this Agreement and the facts set forth herein in connection with, and in deciding, any examination, action, or proceeding under the jurisdiction of that State Mortgage Regulator; and that this Agreement may, if relevant, be admitted into evidence in any matter before a State Mortgage Regulator.
Standing and Choice of Law. Each State Mortgage Regulator has standing to enforce this agreement in the courts or administrative hearing process of the State Mortgage Regulator's home state. In the event of any disagreement between any State Mortgage Regulator and Amerisave regarding the enforceability or interpretation of this agreement or any Party's compliance therewith, the courts or administrative hearing process of the state of the State Mortgage Regulator shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute, and the substantive and procedural laws of said State Mortgage Regulator's home state shall govern the interpretation, construction and enforceability of this agreement.
Standing and Choice of Law. That each Participating State has standing to enforce this Agreement in judicial or administrative processes otherwise authorized under the laws and regulations of the corresponding Participating State. Upon entry, this Agreement shall be deemed a final order of the respective Participating States unless adoption of a subsequent order is necessary under the laws of the Participating States. In the event of any disagreement between any Participating States and West Capital regarding the enforceability or interpretation of this Agreement and compliance therewith, the courts or administrative agency authorized under the laws of the Participating State shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute, and the laws of the Participating State shall govern the interpretation, construction, and enforceability of this Agreement. Venue is where the Participating State’s regulatory agency has its main office. Additionally, a Participating State may consider this Agreement and the facts set forth herein in connection with, and in deciding, any examination, action, or proceeding under the jurisdiction of that Participating State; and that this Agreement may be admitted into evidence in any matter before a Participating State.
Standing and Choice of Law. Each State Regulator has standing to enforce this Consent Order in the judicial or administrative process otherwise authorized under the laws and regulations of the corresponding Examining State. Upon entry, this Consent Order shall be deemed a final order of each respective State Regulator unless adoption of a subsequent agreement is necessary under the terms of the corresponding state. In the event of any disagreement between any State Regulator and Seterus regarding the enforceability or interpretation of this Consent Order and compliance therewith, the courts or administrative agency authorized under the laws of the respective state shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the disputes, and the laws of such state shall govern the interpretation, construction and enforceability of this Consent Order.
Standing and Choice of Law. That each State Money Transmission Regulator has standing to enforce this Agreement in the judicial or administrative process otherwise authorized under the laws and regulations of the corresponding Participating State. Upon entry, this Agreement shall be deemed a final order of each respective State Money Transmission Regulator unless adoption of a subsequent order is necessary under the laws of the corresponding Participating State. In the event of any disagreement between any State Money Transmission Regulator and Voyager regarding the enforceability or interpretation of this Agreement and compliance therewith, the courts or administrative agency authorized under the laws of the corresponding Participating State shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute, and the laws of the Participating State shall govern the interpretation, construction, and enforceability of this Agreement.
