Split Decision Sample Clauses

Split Decision. If after a second vote, the selection committee does not have a majority decision, a second round of discussion and voting is in order. If the third ballot does not result in a majority decision, the chair shall draft a memo to the College President or appropriate Vice President, outlining the split decision and recommending a course of action. All selection committee delegates sign this memo, and the resumes and applications of all short- listed applicants are attached to it.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Split Decision. If after a second vote, the SC does not have a majority decision, a second round of discussion and voting is in order. If the third ballot does not result in a majority decision, the Chair shall draft a memo to the College President/Campus Principal, outlining the split decision, and recommending a course of action. All SC delegates sign this memo, and the resumes and applications of all short-listed applicants are attached to it. No Candidate Recommended. Procedure is the same as in above, but a recommendation from the SC for another posting (internal, external or both), or another course of action may be included in the memo. The memo is to be signed by all SC delegates, with the resumes and applications of all short-listed applicants attached.
Split Decision. If after a second vote, the SC does not have a majority decision, a second round of discussion and voting is in order. If the third ballot does not in a majority decision, the Chair shall draft a the College President/appropriate Vice President, outlining the split decision, and recommending a course of action. All SC delegates sign this memo, and the resumes and applications short-listed applicants are attached to it. No Candidate Recommended. Procedure is the same as in above, but a recommendation from the SC for another posting (internal, external, or another course of action may be included in the memo. The memo is to be signed by all SC delegates, with the resumes and applications of all short-listed applicants attached. Procedural Guidelines for Selection Committees Adjournment. In some instances, especially a lengthy discussion process, the SC may suggest an adjournment. SC determines that it is necessary, the Chair shall adjourn the proceedings for not longer than hours. If a weekend is involved, then it would be the next working day in the following week. One or More Candidates. As an alternative to rendering a “split decision” above) or “no candidate selected” decision above), the committee may determine that one or more of the candidates should be If the SC so determines, the Chair shall arrange for the in the same manner as in above. At the the Chair shall explain the reason(s) for the to the candidate(s) and the interview process shall continue as in Section 8 above. The outcome of the shall follow the guidelines described in through above. Position In cases where the SC cannot select any applicant, and the individual responsible for the appointment the position, it is suggested that the same SC continue its function for the second applicants as this committee has already gained experience relative to the posting. There are three conditions for the continuance of the same SC. The individual responsible for the appointment wishes to continuewith the same SC; and The lapse between the recommendationand the posting does not exceed three months; and The SC members or their alternates wish to continue for the second round of interviews.

Related to Split Decision

  • Investment Decision The Purchaser understands that nothing in the Agreement or any other materials presented to the Purchaser in connection with the purchase and sale of the Shares constitutes legal, tax or investment advice. The Purchaser has consulted such legal, tax and investment advisors as it, in its sole discretion, has deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with its purchase of the Shares.

  • The Decision If mediation fails or is not appropriate and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the arbitrator's decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case. With respect to grievances involving customer complaints, the following will apply:

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth:

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Credit Decision Each Bank acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Agent or any other Bank, and based on such documents and information as it has deemed appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement. Each Bank also acknowledges that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Agent or any other Bank, and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking any action under this Agreement.

  • Decision Making All decisions of each Committee shall be made by unanimous vote, with each Party’s representatives collectively having one (1) vote. If after reasonable discussion and good faith consideration of each Party’s view on a particular matter before a Committee, the representatives of the Parties cannot reach an agreement as to such matter within thirty (30) days after such matter was brought to such Committee for resolution or after such matter has been referred to such Committee, such disagreement shall be referred to the JSC (in the case of disagreement of the JRDC), the JEC (in the case of disagreement of the JSC), or the Chief Executive Officers of Miragen and the Chief Executive Officer of Servier or its designee (the “Executive Officers”) (in the case of disagreement of the JEC) for resolution. If the Executive Officers cannot resolve such matter within thirty (30) days after such matter has been referred to them, then [*] that is the subject of the dispute [*]. For clarity, if the Executive Officers cannot resolve such a matter that pertains to [*], [*] will not be obligated to [*] and [*]. For further clarity, if the Executive Officers cannot resolve such a matter that pertains to [*], neither Party shall be obligated to [*] and [*]. Notwithstanding the foregoing provision and any provision to the contrary, [*] shall have the final say with respect to any decision which involves [*] (including, by way of example, [*], whether [*], or whether [*]), and neither Party shall be obligated to [*] on account of [*] for which [*] has exercised such final say unless [*] agreed on by the JSC, JEC or Executive Officers and [*]. [*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Notification of Decision The Committee shall consider a Claimant’s claim pursuant to Section 9.1 within a reasonable time, but no later than ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Committee determines that special circumstances require an extension of time for processing the claim, written notice of the extension shall be furnished to the Claimant prior to the termination of the initial ninety (90) day period. In no event shall such extension exceed a period of ninety (90) days from the end of the initial period. The extension notice shall indicate the special circumstances requiring an extension of time and the date by which the Committee expects to render the benefit determination. The Committee shall notify the Claimant in writing:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.