Sole Source Justification Sample Clauses

Sole Source Justification. Roche Diagnostics Corporation is the sole manufacturer of the Benchmark XT, and Roche Diagnostics Corporation requires their personnel to maintain their instruments for continued use as they are the manufacturer of this equipment. Market research was conducted, and vendors were contacted, however there are no other companies that are able to meet the requirement. Original manufacturer service is required to avoid nullifying the warranty. Any equipment failure would adversely affect NCI/NIH clinical center patients and their optimal care. Attached Documents: SF18 Statement of Work FAR Clause 52.213-4 Simplified Acquisitions Terms and Conditions (JAN 2014) is applicable and available in full text upon request.

Sole Source Justification. Project Description –

Sole Source Justification. Sole source justification should be thoroughly documented.

Sole Source Justification. The BOND Rxm staining module is manufactured and sold by Leica Microsystems. The repair requires personnel who are familiar with the instrument and have had training by Leica. Leica also does not sell their parts to third parties and if a vendor was able to be found, there would be a delay in repairing because the vendor would have to order the part from Leica. The service agreement also includes unlimited technical telephone and web support. To find other vendors who also repair Leica instruments, a Google search was performed. No vendors appeared on the search. The MIB has had Leica as the service vendor since the instrument was initially purchased in 2017. Attached Documents: SF18 Statement of Work FAR Clause 52.213-4 Simplified Acquisitions Terms and Conditions (AUG 2019) is applicable and available in full text upon request REQUEST FOR QUOTATION (THIS IS NOT AN ORDER) THIS RFQ IS IS NOT A SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE PAGE OF PAGES

Sole Source Justification. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ has 34 years of professional experience in the field of fisheries science (see appended resume) and was previously involved with the Eastern ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Joint Venture (EBTJV) having served on the partnership’s Steering Committee, its Science and Data Sub- Committee and he led the original range-wide ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ status assessment in the eastern portion of the U.S. ▇▇▇▇ is particularly well suited to perform the scope of work described in this agreement as he has provided valuable advice and support to the EBTJV and its partners for map making; methods documentation; and, development of databases (e.g. occupancy, GIS layers, catchment and patch databases). ▇▇▇▇ has established effective working relationships with many landscape-scale conservation organizations operating within the EBTJV’s geographic scope. This is demonstrated by the national award he received from the National Fish Habitat Partnership in recognition of the scientific support he provided towards implementing the National Fish Habitat Action Plan; the work he’s done for the Appalachian Land Conservation Cooperative in assisting with the development of a riparian restoration decision support tool; administrating the US Geological Survey’s Fisheries Research Program that included the development of a ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ research plan; and, developing a climate change model for ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ and catchment assessment methods/patch metrics being used by the Chesapeake Bay Program. ▇▇▇▇ was instrumental in leading the development of the EBTJV’s initial status assessment of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (2005) as well as the partnership’s most recent assessment at a finer scale. As a result of his efforts, ▇▇▇▇ has hands on experience working with all the EBTJV state agencies responsible for managing the ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ resources within their respective jurisdictions. ▇▇▇▇ participated as a member of the original work groups that established the EBTJV’s initial set of conservation priorities, as well as range-wide and regional metrics for success. Additionally, he has developed models and publications aimed at identifying priority focus areas for ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ restoration and enhancement activities. While serving as the project lead for a project to restore ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ habitat in ▇▇▇▇▇ Creek (VA), ▇▇▇▇ successfully established quantifiable metrics for measuring the success of this project. Moreover, he’s led the development of metrics for monitoring the outcomes of restoration projects at the national level for both the De...

Sole Source Justification. Sole Source Justifications are reviewed by Purchasing to ensure the vendor requested by the Department is the only reasonable source from which to procure the product or services required. Examples of when sole sourcing is used includes situations involving unique product or product/service features, replacement parts or continuity of existing equipment or service. Should there be other vendors available to provide the product or service, Purchasing will have the department quote or bid. Relief from taxes due to the tax/corporate status of an organization. The effective and expiration dates of an agreement. May be an automatic renewal agreement with a window for making changes (e.g. written notice 60 days prior to expiration). Also known as Terms of Service. Rules that must be followed in order to use the products and/or services in question. Term primarily used for construction related contracts, in which the contractor is paid based on an agreed upon hourly rate and actual cost of materials/equipment. A company or individual who provides goods and/or services to the University. WMU-issued blanket purchase order. This document is used in lieu of a purchase order when there is any level of variability in the purchase and/or receipt of the goods and/or services. These circumstances normally are numerous purchases of the same item or a combination of items on a repetitive basis during an annual period. Vendor contracts are also issued for construction and renovation projects where there is a project cost, projected timeline and multiple payments, or on a Time and Material basis where there are known service rates but unknown final costs, with a defined contract term.

Sole Source Justification. Sartorius is the sole provider of service for their Octet line of BLI instruments. Octet BLI instruments are complex lab research products that are only serviced by fully trained Sartorius Engineers who have received specialized factory training. Sartorius Octet BLI instruments are not serviced by any 3rd party provider. Sartorius does not sell parts to maintain or repair Octet BLI instruments to any 3rd party providers. Therefore, only Sartorius can meet original equipment manufacturer (OEM) specifications. Attached Documents: SF18 Statement of Work FAR Clause 52.213-4 Simplified Acquisitions Terms and Conditions (AUG 2019) is applicable and available in full text upon request Released 08/05/99. Submitted to but not yet approved by NIH Forms Officer.

Sole Source Justification. This purchase request is for the service maintenance contract of the GloMax Discover instrument which was purchased from Promega Corporation. As regular maintenance service is required from the manufacturer of the instrument, the maintenance service contract needs to be established with Promega Corporation only. We did a Google search and did not find any other vendor that can perform this service for the GloMax Discover instrument as the manufacturer of the instrument is Promega. Attached Documents: SF18 Statement of Work FAR Clause 52.213-4 Simplified Acquisitions Terms and Conditions (AUG 2019) is applicable and available in full text upon request d. STATE MD f. ZIP CODE e. STATE

Sole Source Justification. The Center for Immune-Oncology (CIO) is a large translational research program with the goal of designing, developing, and delivering innovative immunotherapies for various types of human cancers. Multiple projects in the CIO utilize data obtained from the Celigo imaging cytometer. The level of electronic and computer-based sophistication requires that the maintenance be overseen by highly trained instrument repair persons. In addition, at such times that this instrument requires replacement parts, those parts must be manufacturers’ replacement parts and accessories to ensure ongoing compatibility with existing equipment. In fact, Revvity Health Sciences, Inc. is the sole manufacturer of this equipment, and their technicians provide unique knowledge of hardware as well as other proprietary information that is required to maintain these machines in working order. Attached Documents: SF18 Statement of Work FAR Clause 52.213-4 Simplified Acquisitions Terms and Conditions (JAN 2014) is applicable and available in full text upon request U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health REQUEST FOR QUOTATION (THIS IS NOT AN ORDER) THIS RFQ IS IS NOT A SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE PAGE OF PAGES