Shared Mission Separate Governance
Shared Mission Separate Governance Sample Clauses
Related to Shared Mission Separate Governance
Shared Governance The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.
Project Governance (a) If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient will:
Corporate Governance Ultimus shall provide the following services to the Trust and its Funds:
Contract Governance Any contract made or entered into by the TIPS is subject to and is to be governed by Section 271.151 et seq, Tex Lo Code. Otherwise, TIPS does not waive its governmental immunities from suit or liability except to the extent expressly by other applicable laws in clear and unambiguous language. Yes, I Agree (Yes) 9
Allocation of Resources So that the mutually agreedupon objectives of the agreement can be adequately met, resources from the School Board and the DJJ will be allocated based on the previously identified roles and responsibilities of each agency. XXX agrees to the following:
Allocation of Responsibility 6.1 For the purposes of this Schedule 8 responsibility for each minute of delay included in Minutes Delay, each Third Party Train Cancellation, each Diversion, each Failure to Stop and each Planned Service Cancellation shall be allocated according to the responsibility for the incident which caused such Minutes Delay, Third Party Train Cancellation, Diversion, Failure to Stop or Planned Service Cancellation as established in accordance with the following provisions of this paragraph 6.
Cost Responsibility for Network Upgrades 9 5.1 Applicability 9 5.2 Network Upgrades 9
Standard Operating Procedures Over approximately the past eight years, the Parties have been supplying select Products to one another for use in the operation of their respective businesses within the United States of America, Canada and Mexico. The Parties developed and been following certain standard operating procedures in connecting with, among other topics, forecasting, production planning, ordering, delivering and resolving claims on the Products supplied to one another (the “Current SOPs”). The Parties will be updating their respective business systems over the next six months, and the updates to these business systems will require the Parties to modify the Current SOPs. Once the Parties have completed the updates to the business systems and agreed on the necessary modifications to the Current SOPs, the Parties will sign a written amendment to this Agreement appending the updated standard operating procedures (the “Updated SOPs”). Until the Parties have signed a written amendment appending the Updated SOPs, the parties will continue to follow the Current SOPs. The Parties will comply with the applicable SOPs in connection with the purchase and sale of products identified in a Purchase Schedule. The Parties may add terms and conditions to, and amend the terms and conditions of, the SOP in a Purchase Schedule, but any additional and amended terms and conditions in a Purchase Schedule supplementing and modifying the SOP will only apply the specific products identified in that Purchase Schedule for its duration.
IRO Independence and Objectivity The IRO must perform the Claims Review in a professionally independent and objective fashion, as defined in the most recent Government Auditing Standards issued by the United States Government Accountability Office.
Responsibilities and Restrictions Concerning Governing Body, Officers and Employees Grantee and its governing body will:
