Selection Tools Clause Samples
The 'Selection Tools' clause defines the methods and instruments available for choosing or highlighting specific items, data, or elements within a system or process. In practice, this clause may specify which software features, physical devices, or procedural steps are authorized for making selections, such as dropdown menus in an application or checklists in a workflow. Its core function is to ensure consistency and clarity in how selections are made, reducing errors and misunderstandings by standardizing the selection process.
Selection Tools. In filling a vacancy, the Employer will consider employability skills by assessing: Fundamental/competency skills as a base for further development Personal management skills that drive potential for growth (Demonstrate Positive Attributes & Behaviours, Responsible, Adaptable, Learn Continuously, Work Safely) Teamwork skills and attributes needed to contribute productively (Work with Others, Participate in Projects & Tasks) Preliminary Candidates will be graded on one or more selection tools which may include a work sample and an interview. When work samples are utilized and where there is more than one Preliminary Candidate being assessed, it will be graded without personal identifiers. When more than one selection tool is used, Preliminary Candidates can only proceed to the next selection tool if their result is mathematically possible to achieve the overall minimum threshold. All internal and external applicants will be assessed using the same selection tools.
Selection Tools. Preliminary Candidates will be graded on one or more selection tools which may include a work sample and an interview. When work samples are utilized and where there is more than one preliminary candidate being assessed, it will be graded without personal identifiers. When more than one selection tool is used, Preliminary Candidates can only proceed to the next selection tool if their result is mathematically possible to achieve the overall minimum threshold.
Selection Tools. Proposers shall describe provision of a website(s) or comparable resource to the Library with any of the following features: Multi-user “shopping carts” or similar “collections” which serve as a way for the Library staff to select titles and save those titles in lists on the contractor’s website or other resource. Shopping carts should be able to be created from scratch, by modifying contractor supplied lists, and by uploading a list of unique identifiers such as ISBN. Ideally the site will include the ability to add titles manually to the shopping cart that are not part of the contractor’s inventory. Unique logins and passwords allowing for individual personalization, with the ability for administrative oversight capabilities to aggregate lists and manage users. Extensive bibliographic and marketing information for titles, including release date and estimated print runs and demand, and inventory and in-stock information. Full text literary reviews from nationally recognized professional sources (such as Publisher’s Weekly, Library Journal, School Library journal and Booklist) and/or citations which cite the magazines in which literary reviews appear. The ability to grid each title with local distribution and funding information. Creation and maintenance of a location and fund table that can be customized for each cart through the use of grid templates. Flexible and robust searching capabilities including the ability to filter based on format, audience, publication date, and other such search criteria. The ability to batch import order shopping carts with brief MARC 21 (Machine Readable Cataloging) records in Sierra. Formal and informal training and support of the online tool provided at no additional cost. Proposers shall supply, as needed, printed catalogs and other collateral material to aid in the selection of material appropriate for the Library’s collection.