Scoring Criteria Sample Clauses

Scoring Criteria. The first four benchmarks are weighted the same, so failure to substantially meet the four benchmarks will count as one failure and result in withholding of 10% of the fiscal year 2020 PHEP award. Failure to meet the pandemic influenza preparedness planning requirement may result in withholding of 10% of the fiscal year 2020 PHEP award. Evaluation and Performance Measurement CDC’s evaluation and performance measurement strategy will assess recipient progress made across the six domains, and the recipient's related strategies, activities, and outcomes. CDC will deploy several methods for assessing PHEP recipient performance throughout this five-year performance period, including, but not limited to: • CPG reports; • ORRs; • Additional process measures; • Outcome measures; and • Progress reports.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Scoring Criteria. Each entry will receive a score of 0-30, based on the following criteria:
Sample 1
Scoring Criteria. This section fully describes the selection criteria for applications received in response to this funding opportunity. In preparing applications, applicants are strongly encouraged to review the programmatic requirements. Applications will be scored on a scale of 0-100 according to the point distribution specified in the table below. For scoring purposes, more weight will be given based on quality than on quantity. Criterion Points Strength of Strategic Approach and Proposed Project Design 30 Strength of Evidence 15 Quality of Evaluation 15 Organizational Capacity 15 Budget and Budget Narrative 10 Monitoring and Reporting 15 Total 100 The following criteria will be used to assess applications received in response to this announcement:
Sample 1
Scoring Criteria. The four program benchmarks are weighted the same, so failure to substantially meet any one of the benchmarks during each fiscal year will count as one failure and result in withholding of 10% of the following fiscal year’s HPP award. Failure to submit the required program data outlined in the fifth benchmark regarding the annual pandemic influenza preparedness plan requirement will count as one failure and result in withholding of 10% of the following fiscal year’s HPP award. More information on enforcement actions and disputes is available in the withholding and repayment guidance available in the 2017-2022 HPP-PHEP Supplemental Guidelines. PHEP Evaluation and Performance Measurement Strategy CDC’s evaluation and performance monitoring strategy will assess progress made across the six domains, and their related strategies, activities, and outcomes described in this announcement. CDC will deploy several methods for assessing awardee performance throughout this five-year project period, including collection of process measures, reports, and program and performance measures. Process Measurement CDC will measure PHEP awardee progress using a variety of standard reports and systematic approaches. These include but are not be limited to the following elements.
Sample 1
Scoring Criteria. In order to qualify, the applicants are required to meet all the following minimum qualification criteria regarding applicants general and particular experience personnel and equipment (computer aids etc.) capabilities, software’s and financial position as demonstrated by the applicant’s response through the questionnaire attached at Appendix-I. Note: All the applicants submit the required information / documents with their bid / proposal with index details of documents and with clear locations of attachments. Soft copy of all documents duly signed to be provided with the proposal. Appendix-I Qualification questionnaire consultancy services: Technical Qualification Basis
Sample 1
Scoring Criteria. Applicant has written evidence that small business development will be supported by startup or expansion as a result of the grant. 5 points for each letter for separate businesses up to 25 points
Sample 1

Related to Scoring Criteria

  • Servicing Criteria    Applicable Servicing Criteria Reference Criteria 1122(d)(2)(iv) The related accounts for the transaction, such as cash reserve accounts or accounts established as a form of overcollateralization, are separately maintained (e.g., with respect to commingling of cash) as set forth in the transaction agreements. X 1122(d)(2)(v) Each custodial account is maintained at a federally insured depository institution as set forth in the transaction agreements. For purposes of this criterion, “federally insured depository institution” with respect to a foreign financial institution means a foreign financial institution that meets the requirements of Rule 13k-1(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act. X 1122(d)(2)(vi) Unissued checks are safeguarded so as to prevent unauthorized access. 1122(d)(2)(vii) Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed securities related bank accounts, including custodial accounts and related bank clearing accounts. These reconciliations are (A) mathematically accurate; (B) prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements; (C) reviewed and approved by someone other than the person who prepared the reconciliation; and (D) contain explanations for reconciling items. These reconciling items are resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements. Investor Remittances and Reporting 1122(d)(3)(i) Reports to investors, including those to be filed with the Commission, are maintained in accordance with the transaction agreements and applicable Commission requirements. Specifically, such reports (A) are prepared in accordance with timeframes and other terms set forth in the transaction agreements; (B) provide information calculated in accordance with the terms specified in the transaction agreements; (C) are filed with the Commission as required by its rules and regulations; and (D) agree with investors’ or the trustee’s records as to the total unpaid principal balance and number of receivables serviced by the Servicer.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • General Criteria a) Approved varieties shall be those varieties recommended by the Department, the Corporation, or those listed in the Atlantic Provinces Field Crop Guide, Publication 100A;

  • Annual Reports on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria (a) On or before March 1 of each year commencing in March 2018, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Operating Advisor and, if it has made (or is required to make) an Advance during the applicable calendar year, the Trustee, each at its own expense, shall furnish (and each of the preceding parties, as applicable, (i) with respect to any Servicing Function Participant of such party that is a Mortgage Loan Seller Sub-Servicer, shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such Servicing Function Participant to furnish, and (ii) with respect to any other Servicing Function Participant of such party (other than any party to this Agreement), shall cause such Servicing Function Participant to furnish) (each Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Operating Advisor, any Servicing Function Participant and, if it has made (or is required to make) an Advance during the applicable calendar year, the Trustee, as the case may be, a “Reporting Servicer”) to the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, the Serviced Companion Loan Holders (or, in the case of a Serviced Companion Loan that is part of an Other Securitization Trust, the applicable Other Depositor and Other Exchange Act Reporting Party), the Operating Advisor (only in the case of a report furnished by the Special Servicer) and the Depositor, a report on an assessment of compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria (together with a copy thereof in XXXXX-Compatible Format, or in such other format as otherwise agreed upon by the Depositor, the Certificate Administrator, the applicable Other Depositor, the applicable Other Exchange Act Reporting Party and the applicable Certifying Servicer) that complies in all material respects with the requirements of Item 1122 of Regulation AB and contains (A) a statement by such Reporting Servicer of its responsibility for assessing compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, (B) a statement that such Reporting Servicer used the Servicing Criteria to assess compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, (C) such Reporting Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria as of the end of and for the preceding calendar year, including, if there has been any material instance of noncompliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, a discussion of each such failure and the nature and status thereof and (D) a statement that a registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on such Reporting Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria as of and for such period. Copies of all compliance reports delivered pursuant to this Section 10.09 shall be provided to any Certificateholder, upon the written request thereof, by the Certificate Administrator. Each such report shall be addressed to the Depositor and each Other Depositor (if addressed) and signed by an authorized officer of the applicable company, and shall address each of the Relevant Servicing Criteria specified on a certification substantially in the form of Exhibit O to this Agreement delivered to the Depositor on the Closing Date. Promptly after receipt of each such report, (i) the Depositor and each Other Depositor may review each such report and, if applicable, consult with the each Reporting Servicer as to the nature of any material instance of noncompliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, and (ii) the Certificate Administrator shall confirm that the assessments, taken individually address the Relevant Servicing Criteria for each party as set forth on Exhibit O to this Agreement and notify the Depositor of any exceptions. For the avoidance of doubt, the Trustee shall have no obligation or duty to determine whether any such report (other than any such report furnished by the Trustee or any Servicing Function Participant of the Trustee) is in form and substance in compliance with the requirements of Regulation AB.

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of:

  • SCHEDULE AND MILESTONES The planned major milestones for the activities for this Annex defined in the "Responsibilities" Article are as follows:

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Service Eligibility Criteria 4.3.4.1 High capacity EELs must comply with the following service eligibility requirements:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.