Scenarios. A roommate has invited a member of the opposite sex back to his/her room. How would you handle the situation? • You have a couple of roommates who do not participate in any apartment-related activities. They separate themselves from the group and spend time in their room(s). What would you do to build unity in your apartment? • A certain roommate has poor personal hygiene practices and seldom showers or performs any self-care. Sometimes the roommate’s body odor is offensive to you and others in the apartment. How would you approach this roommate and what would you do to help? • One roommate is casual about keeping curfew and often comes in late. You’ve tried to teach this roommate in a lighthearted, casual way but he/she has not changed his/her behavior. What do you do now? • On Sundays you’ve noticed that a roommate or two violate dress and grooming standards for church meetings. For example, the skirt is shorter than it is on weekdays or the facial hair is more prominent on Sundays than on any other day of the week. What would you do? • You notice that a roommate has some edgy posters, DVDs, and reading material in his/her room. He/she is often up late on the computer and you suspect that he/she is involved in viewing pornography. What action would you take? • Your neighbors are planning a costume party that is reported to include a DJ, black lights, and “crazy” music. You’ve been invited but feel that the party is not going to reflect BYU-Idaho standards for dress and behavior. What would you do? • You are aware of a roommate who is engaging in activities of self-harm. He/she has had a rough home life and you know that he/she is struggling emotionally, psychologically, and spiritually. How would you address this situation? • A friend is planning a co-ed camping trip next weekend. You are invited to attend. This is not a campus- or xxxx-sponsored event and you know that it compromises a university standard. What would you do? • An engaged roommate has his/her fiancée over for several hours every day. They eat lunch and dinner together (often leaving a mess) and have taken up “residency” on the couch. There is seldom a time that the fiancée is not present. You’re beginning to feel uncomfortable in your own apartment. What would you do? • You have two roommates who seem to always be watching TV shows or movies that portray sexuality, intense violence, and/or use profanity including taking the Lord’s name in vain. You’re a bit scared to approach these roomm...
Scenarios. The Parties hereby agree that all Scenarios existing as of the Effective Date, and not subject to use or license restrictions in any agreement between VirTra and a third party, are accurately described in Exhibit H, and are considered part of the VirTra Software and the Integrated Software hereunder. Where VirTra develops or has developed additional Scenarios after the Effective Date, VirTra shall promptly notify Modern Round, and such additional Scenarios shall be deemed part of VirTra Software. Modern Round may from time to time develop its own Scenarios, which shall be owned solely by Modern Round, and Modern Round shall have no obligation to use any Scenarios provided by VirTra; provided, however, that any [****]. VirTra hereby agrees that it shall develop and deliver additional Scenarios as set forth in the Development Plan during the Term of this Agreement.
Scenarios. Three scenarioswere identified which are both scientifically challenging and com- mercially relevant. They represent comprehensive sets of challenges in an illus- trative way, so that robotics experts can easily relate their own research to them. The scenarios build on each other. – The first scenario of ECHORD is the human-robot co-worker. In this scenario, the traditional idea of pre-programmed robots was dropped, and the robot interacts with a human towards achieving a common goal. This scenario is especially relevant for future industrial applications, where the (physical or sensor-based) fences between robots and humans disappear. – The second scenario is the hyper-flexible cells scenario. This scenario envisages not only one or more highly dexterous and cooperative robots, but also the hardware and software integration of the robots with an automatic warehouse system and the other devices present in the cell. – The third scenario is the cognitive factory. This scenario aimed at taking the classical concept of the flexible manufacturing systems to a new level. The final goal is to create environments which configure themselves and are fault-tolerant, and which contain autonomous robots jointly participating in the production process with their human counterparts.
Scenarios. Here different scenarios can be designed. The scenarios are defined by their variations to the reference sce- xxxxx that has been defined in the Demands, Supply, Storages and Introduction and setup parts. You can choose how many scenarios you want to make, as well as how many variations should be made in each scenario. Figure 26 Screenshot of the “Scenarios” in Simulation interface • How many scenarios do you want to make?: Set how many scenarios you want to make. The matrix below will adjust accordingly. Note, changing either number of scenarios or variations resets the matrix below. • How many variations do you want to make?: Set how many variations you want to make on the refer- ence in each scenario. The matrix below will adjust accordingly. It is important to remember that some technologies are defined by more than one input, such as electricity storage, and it is important to include all relevant inputs of a technology that one wants to change. Note, changing either number of scenarios or variations resets the matrix below.
Scenarios. This section presents an evolved description of the scenarios from D3.1 with a mapping to the presented FLAME architecture and the use cases above. Throughout all scenarios, we will represent each media component by a unique FQDN using the naming convention <COMPONENT_ACRONYM>.xxxxxxxx_xxxx.xxxxx.xx Furthermore, each relationship connector between two media components illustrates a direction representing the component that initiates and the component which serves. This information flow is reflected in the naming of the require service level agreement between two media components, i.e.: <SERVING_MEDIA_COMPONENT><INITIATING_MEDIA_COMPONENT>
Scenarios. All experiments will be run in four different scenarios. No RINA Network: This scenario uses triggers from the operators OSS/NMS (here simulated by a skeleton application) to benchmark the DMS strategy execution. All developed strategies will be tested for speed and scale. The DMS will be a stand-alone DMS as shown in Figure 11. Minimum RINA Network: This scenario uses the minimum RINA network (2 hosts, 2 border routers, 1 interior router, cf. Figure 13) with an associated strategy for the experiment. The DMS will be a full configuration as shown in Figure 12. Medium Size RINA Network: This scenario uses a medium size RINA network, for instance the European network used in experiment 3 as shown in Figure 21 and an associated strategy for the experiment. The DMS will be a full configuration as shown in Figure 12. Milestone Month Description MS1 M16 DMS Software with Strategy Executor, OSS/NMS trigger, MA/Demonstrator Integration MS2 M17 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS3 M18 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS4 M19 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS5 M20 Strategy for experiment defined and tested MS6 M21 reference experiment with measurements on LMI reference server MS7 M22 continuous experiments for scenario 1 (benchmarking) MS8 M24 continuous experiments for scenario 2 (minimal RINA network) MS9 M26 continuous experiments for scenario 3 (medium size RINA network) MS10 M28 continuous experiments for scenario 4 (large size RINA network) Table 1: Milestones for experiment 1 DRAFT Large Size RINA Network: This scenario uses a large size RINA network, for instance the US network used in experiment 3 as shown in Figure 22 and an associated strategy for the experiment. The DMS will be a full configuration as shown in Figure 12.
Scenarios. VirTra to list all licenses and obligations to third parties with respect to any Scenarios and VirTra Technology. For Sale Scenario Library Product TYPE Category Scenario Title 180 LE Disturbances Biker Bxxxx 180 LE Domestic Violence Residential Rxxxx Xxxx 180 LE Off Duty Movie Joker 300 LE Active Shooter Midnight Madness (multi-incident) 300 LE Disturbances Biker Bxxxx 300 LE Domestic Violence Residential Rxxxx Xxxx 300 LE High Risk Entries Teen Crush breach 300 LE High Risk Entries Youre Fired breach 300 MIL Hostage Situation Operation Industrial Rescue 300 LE Hostage Situation Teen Crush 300 LE Off Duty Movie Joker 300 LE Suicidal Subjects 227_Down & Out 300 LE Suspect Contact 229_Hide & Seek (Multi-Incident) 300 LE Suspect Contact No Way Out 300 LE Suspicious Subjects 234_AirGun Commandos 300 LE Traffic Stops 238_Coyote Run LE Base Scenario Library Product TYPE Category Scenario Title 100 LE Active Shooter 216_You’re Fired 100 LE Ambush Unknown Problem 100 LE Ambush Door Encounter 1 100 LE Ambush Dark Corner 100 LE Ambushes Nightmare Alley 100 100 LE Ambushes Front Yard Ambush 100 100 LE Ambushes No Show 100 LE Court/Jail 209_Mess Duty Hostage 100 100 LE Court/Jail 211_Self-Inflicted 100 100 LE Disturbance Biker Bxxxx 100 LE Disturbances 246_Hooker OD 100 100 LE Domestic Violence 223_Stalker 100 LE Domestic Violence Domestic Disturbance 100 100 LE Domestic Violence 213_Brotherly Love 100 100 LE Domestic Violence Bridge Baby Abduction 100 100 LE Domestic Violence Residential Rxxxx Xxxx 100 LE EDP 258_Silent Sxx 100 LE EDP’s 250_Bag Man 100 LE EDP’s EDP 100 100 LE High Risk Entries No Show Breach 100 LE High Risk Entries Lobby Rescue breach 100 LE High Risk Entries Wife Hostage Breach 100 LE High Risk Entries Youre Fired breach 100 LE High Risk Entries Teen Crush breach 100 LE High Risk Entries Silent Sxx Xxxxxx 100 LE Hostage Situation 251_Wife Hostage 100 100 LE Hostage Situation 232_Probationer 100 LE Hostage Situation 204_Officer Rescue 100 100 LE Hostage Situation Teen Crush 100 LE Hostage Situation Blind Date 100 LE Hostage Situation 200_Cop Hostage 100 100 LE Hostage Situation Human Shield 100 LE Hostage Situation Office Hostage 100 100 LE Hostage Situations Door Encounter 3 100 LE Off Duty ATM Hold Up 100 LE Off Duty Movie Joker 100 LE Off Duty Show Time 100 LE Skill Drills Random Pepper Poppers 1 100 100 LE Skill Drills Pepper Poppers 2 100 100 LE Skill Drills Pepper Poppers 1 100 100 LE Skill Drills Hxxxx’x Alley - Office 100 100 LE Skill Drill...
Scenarios. Consider the following scenarios pertaining to employees called to duty for military purposes who maintained an employee/employer relationship under USERRRA to determine how to handle your situation: If the 90 day advance notice of the referendum (Federal law does not prescribe the form of notice) is issued on January 1st and it is determined prior to 12:00 A.M. January 1st that an eligible member(s) of the coverage group is deployed and has maintained under USERRA intent to return to employment then the 90 day notice will be extended from March 31st to May 30th for all participants. Therefore, the referendum may be held any time on or after May 31st. Federal law allows states to conduct voting for purposes of holding a referendum by whatever means they prescribe as long as the conditions within 218(d)(3) and 218(d)(7) are met. Employees who are called to duty for military purposes are often unaware of the amount of time that they will be detailed. In many instances their departure could be days, weeks, months, or years. If the 90 day advance notice is sent at any point during the absence of any eligible employee of the retirement system due to being called to duty then the additional 60 days must be given to all eligible employees. The extension can not be retracted once issued. In certain infrequent situations reservist or guard members may be activated to participate in short duration events not related to the event of war or other national emergency, in which case it is left to the State’s discretion whether they choose to activate the 60 day extension. Divided vote referendum Called to duty employees who failed to respond to the notice of a divided vote referendum will be given the opportunity to vote upon their return to employment, if an employee/employer relationship was maintained under USERRA. This applies to any divided vote referendum in which the outcome by the other eligible members was either “yes” or “no” to coverage. Called to duty employees will be given a second chance procedure to obtain coverage, indicated in SL 30001.335, as in the case of a present member who votes “NO” in a divided vote referendum. Under these procedures, the individual must file written request for Social Security coverage with the State prior to the execution of the modification providing such coverage. Coverage can be extended under the procedure described in SL 30001.335(A) to these employees on the date designated in the modification to control who will b...
Scenarios. In Deliverable 4.1 we identified three major scenarios. They basically indicate var- ious degrees of change (churn) in the underlying network topologies. The first sce- xxxxx, entitled Global Facility Management (GFM), targets static networks such as the ones deployed for environmental monitoring over long periods of time. The sec- ond scenario, named Object Tracking at Borders (OTB), targets networks made up of static infrastructure in which a limited number of nodes can be mobile, while the third scenario, Sports Tracking (ST), targets fully mobile networks. Throughout the WISEBED project data sets for all three scenarios have been collected.
Scenarios. 5.5.5 The scenarios that were interrogated within the SATURN model, and from which turning flows for all junctions were obtained, include: Base Year 2016; Do Minimum 2021; Do Minimum 2036; Do Something 2021; and Do Something 2036.
