RFP Procedure and Evaluation Sample Clauses

RFP Procedure and Evaluation. Short-Listed Proposers are advised that the evaluation criteria and weightings for the evaluation of the Proposals will differ from the criteria set forth in this RFQ to evaluate SOQs. In addition, the scores and evaluation of the SOQs shall not carry over or be used in any way in the evaluation of the Proposals.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
RFP Procedure and Evaluation. Short-Listed Proposers are advised that the evaluation criteria and weightings for the evaluation of the Proposals will differ from the criteria set forth in this RFQ to evaluate SOQs. In addition, the scores and evaluation of the SOQs shall not carry over or be used in any way in the evaluation of the Proposals. Arizona Department of Transportation Phoenix Metropolitan Area Freeway Lighting Project Page 47 of 5858 Request for Qualifications Project #F014701C Addendum #3, September 14, 2017 7. COMMUNICATION, PUBLIC INFORMATION & ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Sample 1
RFP Procedure and Evaluation. The Commission has given its staff broad direction on the content and methodology for the solicitation of Proposals from short listed Proposers, the selection of a Proposer whose Proposal offers the apparent best value to TxDOT and the terms and conditions a CDA must contain to be deemed satisfactory. TxDOT staff and consultants intend to work with the Commission during the RFQ process to define the RFP and negotiation process with specificity, which may include, at an appropriate time, industry review of a draft RFP and contract documents, among other information. Proposers are advised that the evaluation criteria and weightings for the calculations of the Proposals may differ from the criteria set forth herein to evaluate PQSs.
Sample 1
RFP Procedure and Evaluation. The Commission has given TxDOT broad direction on the content and methodology for the solicitation of Proposals from shortlisted Proposers, the selection of a Proposer whose Proposal offers the apparent best value to TxDOT and the terms and conditions a P3A must contain to be deemed satisfactory. TxDOT staff and consultants intend to work with the Commission during the RFQ process to define the RFP and negotiation process with specificity, which may include, at an appropriate time, industry review of a draft RFP and contract documents, among other information. Proposers are advised that the evaluation criteria and weightings for the evaluations of the Proposals may differ from the criteria set forth herein to evaluate QSs. Award of the P3A by the Commission will be conditioned upon finalization of the P3A and subject to approvals from or reviews by FHWA, the Legislative Budget Board and the Attorney General in accordance with applicable law.
Sample 1
RFP Procedure and Evaluation. Respondents are advised that the evaluation criteria and weightings for the evaluation of the Proposals submitted in response to the RFP will differ from the criteria set forth in this RFQ to evaluate SOQs. In addition, the scores and evaluation of the SOQs, as well as any revised SOQ scores and evaluations resulting from changes in a Proposer’s organization or Key Personnel, shall not carry over or be used in any way in the evaluation of the Proposals.
Sample 1
RFP Procedure and Evaluation. The Commission has given TxDOT broad direction on the content and methodology for the solicitation of Proposals from shortlisted Proposers, the selection of a Proposer whose Proposal offers the apparent best value to TxDOT and the terms and conditions a P3A must contain to be deemed satisfactory. TxDOT staff and consultants intend to work with the Commission during the RFQ process to define the RFP and negotiation process with specificity, which may include, at an appropriate time, industry review of a draft RFP and contract documents, among other information. Proposers are advised that the evaluation criteria and weightings for the calculations of the Proposals may differ from the criteria set forth herein to evaluate QSs. If the RFP solicits Proposals for both the design-build and toll concession methods (rather than for a single delivery method), TxDOT anticipates a two-step evaluation process. The first step will be to evaluate all Proposals received for each delivery method separately against specified criteria to determine the Proposal for each delivery method that provides the best value. The second step will be to compare the best value design-build Proposal with the best value toll concession Proposal in accordance with an objective and transparent formula to be set forth in the RFP to determine which Proposal provides the best overall value to the State. Award of the P3A by the Commission will be conditioned upon finalization of the P3A and subject to approvals from or reviews by FHWA, the Legislative Budget Board and the Attorney General in accordance with applicable law.
Sample 1

Related to RFP Procedure and Evaluation

  • GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND ARBITRATION 8.01 For purposes of this Agreement, a grievance is defined as a difference arising between the parties relating to the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of the Agreement including any question as to whether a matter is arbitrable.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”.

  • Nature and Purpose of the Processing The purpose of the Processing of Company Personal Data by Service Provider is the performance of the Services pursuant to the Agreement.

  • Nature and Purpose of Processing The Parties will Process Shared Personal Data only as necessary to perform under and pursuant to the Applicable Agreements, and subject to this Data Processing Addendum, including as further instructed by Data Subjects.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!