Review Factors Sample Clauses

Review Factors. The Coordinating Committee shall be -------------- responsible for approving the construction of any proposed Future Segment. In addition to the design standards described in Article VII, the following factors shall be considered in making a decision to approve a proposed Future Segment:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review Factors. Factors that the Agency will consider in reviewing pay-
Review Factors. This Review Form is designed to enhance the productivity and skill development of interns from Baylor’s Department of Museum Studies. The review will be based on guidelines that will weigh the success of the internship. This evaluation will be a collaborative effort between the intern and the museum professional who serves as supervisor. The evaluation is used to: • Provide an assessment of the intern’s work at the internship Site • Provide an assessment of the site’s internship program • Improve teamwork and communication for the internship program • Develop the intern’s potential as a future museum professional INSTRUCTIONS

Related to Review Factors

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • POST-REVIEW DISCOVERIES If, during the implementation of an undertaking, a previously unidentified property that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register is encountered, or a known historic property may be affected in an unanticipated manner, the Agency Official shall follow 36 C.F.R. § 800.13(b).

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Tests 7.7.1 If the Contract Documents, laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or orders of any public authority having jurisdiction require any portion of the Work to be inspected, tested or approved, the Contractor shall give the Architect timely notice of its readiness so the Architect may observe such inspection, testing or approval. The Contractor shall bear all costs of such inspections, tests or approvals conducted by public authorities.

  • Evaluations Formal written performance evaluations of each employee shall be carried out during the probationary period and not less than annually thereafter.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.