Review Board. The Review Board shall be comprised of one (1) Association representative selected by the grievant, one (1) member designated by the Manager of Labor Relations, and an impartial third member. The impartial third member shall be determined as follows: either party may request the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service to furnish a list of five (5) persons from which the parties shall within five (5) working days of receipt of such list agree upon selection of the third member or determine by lot the order of elimination and thereafter each shall in that order alternately eliminate one (1) name until only one name remains. The remaining person on the list shall be the impartial third member. The expenses of the third impartial member shall be borne fully by the non- prevailing party. Both parties agree not to use outside consultants or legal counsel in preparing for and presenting the facts before the Review Board. Both parties to the grievance shall prepare an outline detailing the items or issues in dispute setting forth any relevant background, facts, data, or arguments in support of their position for presentation to the Review Board. The Review Board shall, by majority vote, render a final and binding bench decision to resolve the dispute upon conclusion of the review process. No decision of the Board shall be considered a precedent for the disposition of any other case submitted to the Board, or to formal arbitration, or to any other dispute resolution forum.
Review Board. The standing committee on reclassification shall serve as the “Seniority Review Board.” Should an employee believe that he/she meets the qualifications of a job, which the department head has advised to be contrary, he/she may appeal such dispute to the Seniority Review Board. The Board shall take testimony and evidence from the department head and the employee in the same manner as the Grievance Adjustment Panel. The Board shall determine, by majority vote, whether the employee has the ability to meet the qualifications of the job in question. The decision of the Seniority Review Board shall be binding on the parties.
Review Board. Wenatchee Valley College will have an institutional review board (IRB) to oversee research activities involving human subjects. This board will operate in compliance with federal law regarding such review boards (45 CFR Part 690: Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects). The board’s procedure will be posted in a publicly accessible site on the college website. The selection of members will comply with current requirements of 45 CFR Part 690 and will be updated to meet these standards as necessary. Initially the Institutional Review Board will have a minimum of 6 members with varying backgrounds: the administrator in charge of Institutional Effectiveness at WVC, a student services representative (multicultural affairs, counseling, or other), a member of the science division, a member of the social services division, a member of the allied health division, and a member of the community who has no other affiliation to WVC and no immediate family member affiliated with the Institution. Member will be selected in the following manner:
Review Board. The Board agrees to have a minimum of one (1) monthly meeting during the school year with the Buena Vista Education Association negotiating committee to discuss any and all problems which are proper subjects for collective bargaining. This meeting may be cancelled upon request of the Association.
Review Board. A Review Board is hereby created consisting of (a) an officer of Developer,
Review Board. Departmental Review Boards may be established to review workloads and/or discuss problems surrounding appointments. In each case, the Review Board will include a Management Representative and a Union Representative. One other Non-Partisan person, experienced in the area of work being reviewed, may be called upon for assistance. Should the two representatives not be able to reach agreement on the use of a Non-Partisan Person, the Union and the Board will appoint such a person. The employee concerned may be called on to provide information. The Review Board will respond within thirty (30) calendar days of the initial meeting.
Review Board. 1. If the aggrieved party is not satisfied with the disposition of its grievance in Step 1, the grievance and all information shall be submitted to a review board consisting of three Xxx County School District bargaining unit members and three Xxx County School District administrators. The review board shall make a final attempt to resolve the grievance.
Review Board. The review board shall consist of four (4) parties: the Chief Executive Officer of LEPFA or his designee, a representative of LSC, a representative of TMO, and a fourth representative (the “Neutral Representative”) to be agreed upon by both Parties. In the event the Parties are not able to mutually agree on the Neutral Representative within 30 days of written notice of a dispute, the Parties shall each select three (3) names from the Xxxxxx County Neutral Case Evaluators list (Commercial Panel) and select one of those six (6) names randomly. LEPFA and LSC may be assisted or represented by legal counsel at any stage of the proceeding.
Review Board. Development within Brickhope Plantation shall be subject to application to or review by the City of Goose Creek Architectural Review Board, and shall conform to the following procedure as well as to the general design principles of the City of Goose Creek Architectural Design Review Ordinance for approval of any construction within the development. Application Procedure for all Commercial, Office, or Industrial Development: Brickhope Plantation Architectural Review Board All applicants wishing to proceed with non-residential development within Brickhope Plantation shall first submit architectural, site and landscape plans for approval by the Brickhope Plantation Architectural Review Board (BPARB) as set forth in this Development Agreement. This submittal shall include the following: Site Plans □ The name of the project and name(s) of engineers, landscape architects, architects, etc.; □ The boundaries and dimensions of the proposed site or lot; □ Locations and dimensions of the principal and any accessory buildings with distances from property boundaries indicated;
