Review and Assessment. Review previous survey results and conduct an inspection of the facilities in order to collect the required amount of samples of suspect material. Determine the extent, condition, and approximate quantities of lead and asbestos containing materials.
Review and Assessment. The Program and possible changes and / or variations of this Agreement will be assessed annually.
Review and Assessment. 4.1 The ITO shall have final review and assessment of all plans. If the ITO cannot approve a plan after regional coordination, then the ITO will return the plan to LG&E/KU for further development as appropriate. The process for final approval of any previously rejected plan will follow the same iterative process as outlined above.
Review and Assessment. 1. Following the receipt of each progress report submitted to them by the Air Quality Committee in accordance with Article VIII and the views presented to the International Joint Commission on that report in accordance with Article IX, the Parties shall consult on the contents of the progress report, including any recommendations therein.
Review and Assessment. The City and TransLink will work jointly and cooperatively to review and assess over time the structure of the Monitoring Committee and the overall monitoring process set out in this SPA. Any changes to be made to the Monitoring Committee or the overall monitoring process herein stated must have the agreement of both the representatives of TransLink and the City on the Monitoring Committee. For clarity, the opportunity for review set out in the preceding paragraph is based on the recognition of expected changes over time related to data availability, organizational structures, project planning and implementation, and other factors not necessarily known to the Parties at the outset of this SPA. In addition, it may be appropriate to reduce over time the frequency of the meetings of the Monitoring Committee or delivery of Performance Reports.
Review and Assessment. The Consultant shall review all current Federal, State and local requirements for landscaping, beginning with Rapid City Municipal Code Section 17.50.300, to determine existing landscaping requirements for the City of Rapid City. Considerable work has previously been done by the Beautification Committee toward revising the landscaping ordinances. This information will be made available to the Consultant and the Consultant shall consider this information as part of their review and assessment. The Consultant shall review and determine current practices, environmental and seasonal factors, and standards appropriate to the culture, context and custom of the community for both construction and maintenance of landscaping. The Consultant will involve the public, stakeholders and various community agencies and decision makers in the process. The Consultant will review and assess what can be learned from demonstration projects such as the Bureau of Reclamation’s Demonstration Garden, The Journey Museum’s landscaping, Canyon Lake Park Demonstration Garden as well as other existing public and private facilities in the community. The Consultant shall review the existing regulatory framework for landscaping, and evaluate the need and appropriateness to develop, change, amend, clarify, and otherwise create a new ordinance(s). The Consultant shall explore the need and appropriateness of minimum standards for landscaping in keeping with the purposes and objectives set forth in the Rapid City Municipal Code. The review and assessment of the landscaping ordinance shall include an analysis of water conservation measures, integration of storm water management techniques and the aesthetic impacts of the landscaping requirements. As part of its review and assessment, the Consultant shall gather information from communities of similar size and characteristics for comparison and informational purposes. The Consultant shall submit a summary of their findings at the end of this task (Technical Report 1).
Review and Assessment. By June 27, 2014, the District will complete a review and assessment of access to and enrollment in its AP, Honors, Running Start, and SNHU Dual Credit courses (collectively identified hereinafter as “higher level learning opportunities”) as part of its ongoing efforts to provide all students with equal access to and equal opportunity to participate in the District’s higher level learning opportunities. This review will carefully assess the underrepresentation of black, Hispanic and ELL students (collectively identified hereinafter as “underrepresented groups”) in higher level learning opportunities. The information gathered in this review will be used to identify the root cause(s) of the disparity in enrollment of underrepresented groups in higher level learning opportunities. Information gathered in the review will form the basis for a plan described in Item 3 below, to implement strategies described in Item 2 below, that will increase student participation in its higher level learning opportunities with a particular focus on students from the underrepresented groups. The District may form a committee or hire a consultant or engage another assessor(s) to conduct the review and assessment and make recommendations. The District will provide any committee, consultant, or other assessor(s) with all information identified by the assessor(s) as necessary to engage in the review and assessment. The District will additionally ensure that the committee or consultant or other assessor(s) have expertise in addressing the underrepresentation of students from the underrepresented groups in higher level learning opportunities. At a minimum, the District and/or the committee or consultant or other assessor(s) will:
Review and Assessment. IV.I A periodic review and assessment of the moratorium's impact and effectiveness shall be conducted by an independent body established by the participating parties.
Review and Assessment. 29. ADB and DFAT will conduct a joint assessment of the Framework in June 2025 to determine its value and impact prior to establishing a new Partnership Framework.
Review and Assessment. Professional firms will be evaluated on the following criteria. These criteria will be the basis for review and assessment of the written proposals and optional interview session. At the discretion of the City, interviews of the top rated firms may be conducted. The rating scale shall be from 1 to 5, with 1 being a poor rating, 3 being an average rating, and 5 being an outstanding rating.
