Retrospective Reviews Sample Clauses

Retrospective Reviews. If We have all information necessary to make a determination regarding a retrospective claim, We will make a determination and notify You and Your Provider within 30 calendar days of the receipt of the request. If We need additional information, We will request it within 30 calendar days. You or Your Provider will then have 45 calendar days to provide the information. We will make a determination and provide notice to You and Your Provider in writing within 15 calendar days of the earlier of Our receipt of all or part of the requested information or the end of the 45-day period. Once We have all the information to make a decision, Our failure to make a Utilization Review determination within the applicable time frames set forth above will be deemed an adverse determination subject to an internal Appeal.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Retrospective Reviews. Necessary information includes the results of any patient examination, clinical evaluation or second opinion that may be required. For retrospective review determinations, an HMO shall make the determination within thirty (30) days after receiving all necessary information. For a certification, the HMO may give written notification to the Member’s Provider. For a noncertification, the HMO shall give written notification to the Member’s Provider within five (5) business days after making the noncertification.
Retrospective Reviews. Contractor agrees, on a quarterly basis, to conduct selective retrospective reviews of the following types of cases: i) cases where denials were issued upfront, but the Member did not appeal; and ii) cases where the original denial was appealed by the Member and the decision was upheld by the Contractor’s appeal reviewer, triggering an automatic referral to Maximus, CMS’ independent review organization. Additionally, Contractor will review cases where the original Prior Authorization request was denied that the Member appealed, which led the Contractor’s appeal reviewer to overturn the denial. Contractor will use this added quarterly review process to identify key learnings that it can use to improve its Prior Authorization processes.
Retrospective Reviews. If a pre-service or a care coordination review was not performed, a retrospective review will be done to review services that have already been provided to determine if they are Medically Necessary. Retrospective review is performed when Anthem Blue Cross has not been notified of the services the Member received and therefore is unable to perform the appropriate review. It is also performed when pre-service or care coordination review has been done, but services continue longer than originally certified. Retrospective review may also be performed for the evaluation and audit of medical documentation after services have been provided, whether or not pre-service or care coordination review was performed. Such services which have been retrospectively determined to not be Medically Necessary and appropriate will be retrospectively denied certification. The Medical Necessity Review Process‌ Anthem Blue Cross works with Members and Members’ health care providers to cover Medically Necessary and appropriate care and services. While the types of services requiring review and the timing of the reviews may vary, Anthem Blue Cross is committed to ensuring that reviews are performed in a timely and professional manner. The following information explains Anthem Blue Cross’ review process.

Related to Retrospective Reviews

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the LHIN or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the LHIN or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to:

  • Annual Reviews The Recipient shall:

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Quantitative Results i. Total number and percentage of instances in which the IRO determined that the Paid Claims submitted by CHSI (Claim Submitted) differed from what should have been the correct claim (Correct Claim), regardless of the effect on the payment.

  • Grievance Commissioner System This is to confirm the discussion of the parties during collective bargaining that they are committed to encouraging early discussion and resolution of labour relations issues at the local level and seek to resolve grievances in a timely and cost efficient manner. To that end, this is to confirm that pursuant to Article 8, the parties agree that the Employer and Union at individual nursing homes may agree to utilize the following process in order to resolve a particular grievance through the utilization of a joint mediation-arbitration procedure:

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.